Too many penises



Did anybody else think there were too many penises in this film?

I don't mind one or even two in a movie but to show this many was just gratuitous and excessive. It was too much. There should be limits.





reply

i thought it was too much of the same penises. it could have diversified more.

reply

i thought it was too much of the same penises. it could have diversified more.
Amen!

And may I add, there is no such thing as too many penises. As the Brits say, this whole topic is "bollocks".

reply

Too many penises


What a goofy comment.
That's like saying, "too many actors." Or, "too many faces." Or, in a musical piece, "too many notes." (Remember that scene from Amadeus?)

You can never have too many penises in a film.

reply

I think you meant NOT ENOUGH PENISES.

reply

Ummmm you DID see the sign saying this film contains nudity right? And there were too many? PLEASE! As other posters have said there weren't enough.

reply

@Ms._Movie_Star

Oh, come on---how many times do you even see ONE penis outside of a porn flick in American films--mainstream or indie? NEVER! Having watched European films and knowing how they are (European filmmakers tend to have a very liberal,open, and mature attitude toward sex scenes) I figured they would show at least one, but I have to admit, I was a bit surprised at the rest of them being shown. And they're shown in such a natural, casual and refreshing way (i.e., not thrown all up in your face) I really didn't have a problem with it. That seems to be one of the last taboo in films today---the showing of an actual penis for a change. Since seeing women's naked bodies on film all the time is so normalized, why can't we see an actual penis every now and then?

What I also thought was refreshing about the film was that the as a viewer, you're not made to feel like a voyeur at all seeing either the penises or the sex scenes---it's done in such a casually/naturally/matter-of-fact way, that after awhile, you're just like, "Okay, I'm seeing buck naked dudes just chilling on the beach, lots of sex scenes, and some lovely beach scenes---and it's really no big damn deal--sweet!"

reply

Another thing I liked about the film (there were probably about 10 penises shown---just guessing, I really didn't count, lol) was how all the guys weren't these picture-perfect male supermodel looking types---there were fat dudes and not-so-big dudes---they all had real bodies, not these perfect ripped Hollywood-style abs. That was also refreshing to see. Loved the scenes of the lake---very beautiful and quiet. In fact this was probably the quietest mystery flick I've ever seen,period. Well-made and thoughtful,too.

reply

[deleted]

There should be limits.


Like one wang every 15 minutes? Something like that?

"Sorry, Mr. Director. You used two todgers in that scene so no more for half an hour."

reply

Like one wang every 15 minutes? Something like that?


Depends on the size. One big wang every 15, or two little ones every 15?

Also, are we talking erect or flaccid? One average size erect wang every 15. If you want to throw in a monster wang, then no more wangs, big, small, erect, or flaccid for 20. But a small erect wang, and the next 15 is open if regulations are obeyed.

What about circumcised or not? Most agree that uncircumcised wangs are way cooler. (Do I presume too much?). But they're also more titillating, so perhaps only one uncircumcised wang every 20 minutes. But wait, what if it's a small uncircumcised wang? Flaccid. Well, then you got your 15 back. A small, uncircumcised -erect- wang? Should we allow that in the standard 15? Thoughts?

Perhaps someone has additional thoughts and comments. I think maybe they should just have a Non-Porn Film Industry Wang Committee to set standards. NPFIWC would be composed of writers, directors, producers, actors, and even fans, members of congress, and of course the Catholic church, who are experts in wangs, especially the small ones. They meet and set out standards of wang.

Those violating SOW (Standards of Wang) will be fined depending on the transgression. For example, if an erect uncircumcised wang is more than a millimeter beyond 15.494 centimeters with the window of the 15 standard as laid out by NPFIWC, then you're looking at a fine. If charges are filed, then NPFIWC would have to examine said wang fully erect, and measure with a standard SOW/NPFIWC approved laser measure. NPFIWC would meet again every 3 years to revise the SOW.

NPFIWC will have to set standards of color of wang, (are we talking about a soul pole, or just your average cracker wang? (Would classifying color violate racial equality laws?) Then other things will have to be regulated of course, vein density, curvature, upward pointing, or downward. All producers and directors, studio heads, etc. will be given a standard NPFIWC wall chart for SOW, with photos, sketches, pie charts, graphs, statistical analysis, etc.

What about a wang ejaculating, such as occurred in Stranger By The Lake? Well that's a pretty big deal. I'm stumped on that one. Any thoughts as to how that should be regulated in non-porn movies? That, ladies and gentlemen, is why I think we need NPFIWC.

Obviously, this is just a broad-brush sketch of the concept of SOW. If you're so inclined, feel free to contribute ideas for SOW.

reply

Love it!! You're such an equal-opportunity wanger! You don't discriminate on the basis of size, shape, curve, texture, flaccidity or color of the wang! You're SO inclusive. Only wish Hollywood was so inclusive.

---------------------------------------
I don't love you enough to hate you!

reply

I think violators of SOW ought to bend over backwards to show compliance.

reply

That is so funny....the best post ever on IMDB 😝😝

reply

No such thing as too many!

reply