Nope.....


Sorry, but with people already hysterical about dogs being savage murderers, especially rescues (thanks to the media scaremongering), then a film that shows a supposedly loving dog turning into the canine version of Caesar* is never going to end well for the dogs in this country and around the world. The book was bad enough.

Some people are inherently gullible, as shown by the amount of huskies now dumped in rescues as the media have screamed about 'killer huskies attacking babies' and some owners have panicked or breeders cannot sell them and so dump them, they will believe this sort of movie is real. Stupid? Yes. But still going to happen? Absolutely.

After the movie 'The Grey' came out in the US, and ENTIRE pack was wiped out by the department of fish and wildlife in a 'knee-jerk' reaction to the movie. These are people who should KNOW that was a movie and that wolves do NOT behave in such a way. Instead these people panicked; wiped out a pack with no reason. The local senator demanded an explanation, but frankly that won't bring the dead wolves back.

I volunteered at a dog rescue; I saw sights and heard stories that still haunt me. Did I witness vicious dogs? Not a single one; not one. But I saw plenty of dogs, and cats, that had been abused to appalling standards by humans, yet who still loved a fuss and would be desperate for attention.

All my dogs are rescues - our current two are a siberian husky, one of the supposed 'killers' according to the media hysteria, and an akita cross (another of the alleged breeds that are baby eaters). Yet two more soppy dogs you couldn't meet. Yet rescues across the UK are full of staffordshire bull terriers, pitbulls, huskies, akitas, and a myriad of other alleged 'vicious killer breeds'. Can we now expect that these already swamped rescues will be flooded with retrievers? Oh yes, especially if the media get a hold of this storyline........

I do wonder why media don't make movies about killer cats; but then they're not as good at spreading hysteria as a 'killer dog' are they? Especially one that 'incites' others to murder every human they see...... Dogs, like cats, are wonderful animals - they are often more loyal and loving than humans. To see yet another breed demonised and condemned to living their lives in rescue kennels just makes me feel sick.

*Ceasar was the 'violent' ape from the 'Planet of the Apes' reboot movies.

----

If life gives you lemons; you crush them, throw them back and yell “is that all you got?!!”

reply

Your post is completely redundant and illustrates why people shouldn't post opinions on a film without seeing the film first.

A bird sings and the mountain's silence deepens.

reply

No actually it isn't - I've read the book the film is based on and it's exactly as I described it. Obviously you haven't read the book.

That was my original point - why the movie should not be made; the book was bad enough - put it in glorious technicolour with added gore and idiots will think it's real.

Sadly all that seems lost on you in you rush to appear superior. What a shame.
----

If life gives you lemons; you crush them, throw them back and yell “is that all you got?!!”

reply

I haven't read the book but I have seen the film but it's very 'light' on gore. A brutal experience nevertheless.

reply

It's the brutality that alarms me most; a lot of people will see the film, as they did with 'The Grey', and immediately assume it's real. That's that what the animals actually do become. Like an entire pack of wolves was wiped out by the wildlife department in a knee-jerk reaction to 'The Grey', you can bet this will lead to many more dogs being dumped because of 'Fehér Isten'.

Such blind idiocy does happen - when the bird flu hysteria was at its height, a parent at my daughter's primary school got rid of her entire flock of chickens, about eight in total, because she was convinced they would get infected and kill her family. It was nothing but nonsense, brought on by the scaremongering of the media; but she would not be dissuaded from doing it. No one else wanted them, so she had them killed.

It's that kind of mindless insanity that alarms me and, as I used to volunteer at an animal rescue until my health got too bad, I can tell you some owners are much, much worse than any dog could ever be. 

Some books should NEVER have movies made of them, '50 Shades......' is one and this is another.

----

If life gives you lemons; you crush them, throw them back and yell “is that all you got?!!”

reply

[deleted]

Just have to put this out there - White God was not based on a book. The filmmaker began writing it after visiting a dog pound in Budapest. He discusses the writing process/inspiration in a number of interviews (one example below). So, I'd advise against slandering the intentions of the film and "book" without actually having seen or "read" it.

http://collider.com/white-god-kornel-mundruczo-interview/





reply

I am also in animal rescue. I volunteer for a local shelter, and do a lot of free, at-home hospice care for sick/injured animals. My home has always been full of adopted animals, as I believe in "adopt, don't shop." In other words, I am a fellow soldier.

With that being said...what you suggest is akin to censorship of this movie. and that is something I would never support. Heck, I remember the hooplah when "The Passion of the Christ"came out, and all I thought was how that movie really brought out the crazy religious right. Still, I would never suggest burying it in order to avoid the insanity.

Please also consider that by your statements, you may also suggest that Alfred Hitchcock's "The Birds" or Steven Spielberg's "Jaws" were movies that should never have been made? The thought of that makes me cringe.

reply

@ opiekimba - When 'The Birds' came out, people were still sensible and didn't think it was real. Sadly when 'Jaws' came out and people believed all great whites were like the movie version it was the start of things to come. The great white has always been reviled since then.

I wouldn't have a problem if people who make the movies had a foreword and postscript reminding people this was just a film/book adaptation and FICTION; that these animals, etc are NOT like that and so please do not believe the real world animals, etc are going to do what those in the film/book did. But they don't; they just leave it and have people thinking it's legit.

As a christian I never had a problem with 'the passion of the christ'. I could speak for myself to those would use the film to naysay my religion; and I welcome anything that helps me question my faith. I am a (fairly) articulate human; I am able to speak for myself against anyone offering me nothing but hatred.

However, animals, etc do NOT have that luxury - which is why a whole pack of wolves were wiped out; why a lot of dogs are abandoned by idiotic owners and why 'good ole boys' go hunting 'dangerous' coyotes, etc. They DO believe the film/book and no one tells them it's NOT real.

Some books shouldn't be made into movies; '50 shades.....' was one (the film was NEVER going to live up to the fevered imagination of a frustrated woman) and this is another. For the heartbreaking outcome alone, nor should 'The Grey'.

Animals can't speak to defend themselves; by the time humans try to do so for them, it's always too late. So I just wish these animal, etc hating movies did NOT get made - or, if they have to, that someone had the decency to remind the idiots seeing it (at the beginning AND the end) that it's NOT real.

I'm not trying to censor anyone; just appealing for someone to start using commonsense - it's in too much of a short supply these days when it comes to movie making.

----

If life gives you lemons; you crush them, throw them back and yell “is that all you got?!!”

reply

Oh my, you and I have very different views indeed! And, that's absolutely fine. I was shocked to see you use the word "reviled" in describing sharks. Especially saying they are still looked upon in that manner. I see it so completely opposite, that it makes me smile to think how we can have completely opposing views? Perhaps part of it is a geographical difference?

I am from New England...not far from where the movie was actually shot. Great Whites have only recently come back to our waters on a more regular basis. Most of us believe that many conservation efforts came about as a result of the movie "Jaws". "Shark Week" is now a hugely popular series on the Discovery Network. People now pay good money in order to go out and see a shark, either from a boat, or during a scuba dive. And, each summer when a Great White is seen here...people come in droves in order to observe it, or get a pic if they're lucky. Reviled is not a word I would ever use to describe people's feelings of sharks around here. It actually makes me a little disappointed that you used that word. They are awesome creatures.

As far as placing warnings on films...they are there. Always. They must be there in order to avoid legal trouble. Sure, they are at the end of the credits, but the base is covered.

In the meantime, if anyone is crazy enough to mistake a fictional film as non-fiction, and abuse anyone as a result...there really isn't much that can be done to save them. They are forever lost down the rabbit hole. What we can't do is allow the mentally ill to direct what we can, or can not see/read/hear.

I admit I am ill-informed about the wolf incident you keep mentioning...but, I do know that wolves have been reintroduced in our country (US) and are doing exceptionally well. Here in the Northeast, we have a very healthy population of Coy-Wolves, that rarely see any trouble with us human-kind. I have yet to hear of a crazy person striking them down for existing, even after "The Grey".

Thanks for the discourse!

reply

Peter Benchley himself said, after going on to study sharks, that he wished he'd never written Jaws because of the effect it's had on people's perception. Just the other day a Fox News host suggested "cleansing" the ocean of sharks.

As for wolves it seems every time there is some progress reintroducing wolves, some hunter or organization wipes out a bunch of them. It's always one step forward, two steps back.

reply

Since there is NO BOOK and you haven't seen the movie, I have to say that you're completely full of s---. I mean, as in, it's coming out of your ears and piling up on your shoulders.

The filmmakers rescued 250 mixed-breed dogs from shelters for use in the movie, and, afterwards, found homes for all of them.

The dogs in this movie do not go after all humans; they specifically go after humans that mistreated them.

This movie has no more chance of making people anti-dog than Django Unchained did of making people anti-African-American. And that's leaving aside the fact that people adore dogs.

Prepare your minds for a new scale of physical, scientific values, gentlemen.

reply

There IS a book and it is called DISGRACE. Kornél Mundruczó even said as much in numerous interviews, including a 'roundtable' discussion at Cannes. So I suggest you take your trolling 'full of *beep* comments with you as you close the door on your way out.

I don't care what the film makers did - most people who have seen this film, of which I know three, all loathed it for the impression it gave of dogs. Do you know how hard it is to be a dog owner these days, especially in the UK, thanks to the scaremongering of the media and the government?

I used to volunteer at a dog rescue, my daughter does so now, and the stories we could tell of what those dogs suffer is horrendous. We've volunteered at what the Americans call 'no kill' shelters - but there's plenty of so-called charities (like the RSPCA) who DO kill the animals over the least excuse. Rescues are full to bursting because of imbeciles who panic at the stories on the news, in books and movies and rush their dogs to the rescue - that's the ones who don't choose to have them killed instead.

Some people are NOT reasonable; some people are NOT logical - they are completely guided by media hysteria and whatever they see on the movie screen, the tv screen or read in a book.

So pardon me for being angry at people who make dogs look vicious killers; we should be trying to convince the public they are the OPPOSITE.

----

"The chief obstacle to the progress of the human race is the human race.” – Don Marquis

reply

yeah well White Dog the film is based on Disgrace the book is saying everything is based on everything. it's like saying i won't watch Sons of Anarchy because i don't like Shakespeare

reply

You clearly didn't see the movie.

"Ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?"

reply

No, but I know three people who have and who think the same as I do. They also say it's obvious to see where it's based on the novel 'Disgrace'.

----

"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - Don Marquis

reply

I haven't read the book, but the movie is very blatantly and very clearly against animal abuse. I wouldn't like it if it was sending the opposite message, I'm very sensitive towards any type of violence against animals. My family's owned dogs for years, I grew up around dogs so I obviously know what they are like. I don't think it's (necessarily) the movie's job to educate people on dog's behavior, it's very much a fantasy, but it has many underlying themes about the current government in Hungary, about oppression, segregation and discrimination as well as animal rights. The dogs only get violent after being hunted and being put through lots of abuse, they don't start out violent and you very much root for them throughout. You should see the movie before you judge it 

"Ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?"

reply

Seriously? You NEVER saw the movie, but dare to offer up opinions here?!!!! You know what? Please come to New England. Like now. We have a few Great Whites who'd love to greet you.
Shame on you.

reply

I've got three friends who did see it and agreed with me; they've read the same book too. I didn't realise in a democratic country that the ability to have opinions had conditions......

----

“You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.” ― Friedrich Nietzsche

reply

"No, but I know three people who have and who think the same as I do. They also say it's obvious to see where it's based on the novel 'Disgrace'."

I think you and your 3 friends are over reacting. It's pretty clear that the storyline sheds more light on the horrors of animal abuse and neglect then portraying dogs to be vicious killers as you say.

reply

While I appreciate your feelings on this film and actually agree with you in the instance of other films that seem similar, the message I took away from this film isn't "dogs are dangerous" but "we should treat dogs better."

reply

Wow, you certainly have an agenda and just will not be swayed by . This film was not based on the book Disgrace, there is a dog and a former professor and that's where the similarities end. This film has no connection to Disgrace, no matter how much you seem to believe it does. Disgrace was already made into a film in 2008. You have no right to condemn a film that you haven't seen and have mistaken ideas about its origins. Your opinion is based on misunderstanding and falsehood. Take the time to to read this interview with the director, if you can manage not to double down on your inaccurate impressions.
http://moveablefest.com/moveable_fest/2015/04/interview-kornel-mundruczo-on-the-dog-eat-dog-world-of-white-god.html

reply

I've actually seen the film myself now and stand by what I say. It DOES show dogs in a terrible light - something they don't need MORE of given recent scaremongering in the press. As I told you I volunteered in a dog rescue in the past, my daughter volunteers at one now and the amount of dogs being abandoned by idiot owners who fear them because of the scaremongering media and movies like this one is escalating.

I am sick and tired of people making films which idiots will believe to be true and act accordingly. Many marine biologists have said the film Jaws is one of the main reasons the Great Whites are nearly extinct because morons went out killing them wholesale because they thought they'd 'eat their babies'.

Wolves have been hunted because of the movie 'The Grey' and rednecks believing that wolves are actually some kind of sentient being out to hunt them down first; when actually wolves are terrified of humans.

There are so many instances of morons and fools believing movies and hunting and killing wildlife (and each other) because they think what they saw was true.

Having seen this film, it's no different. I'm very sad that these sorts of films are still being made. You imply people are not easily led; well, I live near Alton Towers and the media scaremongering over the accident that took place there has nearly driven the park out of business.

Even though the victims themselves have said it was a tragic accident and the park owners have bent over backwards to help them (unlike some owners would). But that NEVER got reported; ONLY the bad stuff and so no one's been going.

The knock on effect for surrounding businesses has also been catastrophic. We still don't know if the park itself, along with THOUSANDS of people who's livelihoods depend on it, will even survive; this is in a high unemployment area, so many people rely on the park for a job. The general populace CAN be easily led this incident is a prime example - that is the shame of it. Films like this are all very well for those who can tell the difference between fiction and reality - but there's always that ilk that go off the deep end; and that batch is growing in number. Our local rescues, stuffed to the rafters with unwanted dogs, proves it.

----

"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - Don Marquis

reply

With respect. You're a moron.

The trailer makes it look like the entirity of the film is hundreds of dogs on attack. That's roughly 15 minutes of the two hours. No sane person will see this movie and decide "all dogs are dangerous and must die".

It's not even about the dogs.

reply

This isn't based on a book. And the brutality, for the most part, comes from the humans. The dogs are seeking revenge against those that mistreated and tried to exterminate them. The main relationship is an unbreakable bond between a little girl and her dog. If anything, it "humanizes" the poor dogs awaiting death at the shelter.

Maybe try watching it before commenting? Your diatribe is pretty ridiculous (said as someone who cried her eyes out at the end of this movie, and is happily cohabitating with two dogs she found on the street in bad shape).

They're coming to get you, Barbara!

reply

I watched it on Netflix - I stand by what I said. I also named the book it's based on. However, your opinion; you're entitled to it - just like I am to mine.

----

"That you may retain your self-respect, it is better to displease the people by doing what you know is right, than to temporarily please them by doing what you know is wrong."– William J.H. Boetcker

reply

The film's director has stated over and over again that the movie was partially inspired by a section in the novel Disgrace by J.M Coetzee, he did not adapt the book for the screen. He was also "inspired" by other issues, perhaps if you took the time to read what he had to say about how he created the film, you might understand that saying White God is based on Disgrace is about the same as saying tha Pulp Fiction was based on the Bible. https://thefilmstage.com/features/white-god-director-kornel-mundruczo-talks-dog-training-self-criticism-mirroring-reality-and-more/

reply