These aren't tree houses, they are more like luxury guest houses nailed in a few places into a tree. High end furniture, big flat screen TVs, fancy bathrooms with showers, fully-equipped kitchens with running sinks and appliances, etc.
I guess I had a different idea of what this guy's team would be building on this show. Plus, what the hell is this show doing on Animal Planet?
First of all it's THEY'RE.... And second, he's right, they're guest houses that are sort of in trees...it's not that interesting, and the dude's making a ton of money, that's why they're keeping it going...it's not about adventure. Just the cash.
There we were, minding our own business, when kids started killing themselves all over my property.
Sorry, didnt realize i did that. But its not about adventure when it comes to this show. You want adventure? Go build your own. Your argument is ridiculous.
Apparently you don't get it. You have repeated the same definition over and over in an effort to suggest a tree house is a playhouse for kids.
Read your second definition again. A structure built among the branches of a tree. The (as a playhouse) is merely an example given, since most tree houses were built for kids to play in.
You went from cussing others out for not accepting your narrow definition, to now stating its always understood as a device for kids.
The fact is, regardless of what SOME understand it to be, the three resources I provided above define what it is for all, not some to understand. Any thing that's built using a tree as its main structural support is a tree house, whether it be a kids fort or an elaborate get a way for the rich to enjoy, contrary to what you have been saying here over and over again.
Come on. Is that all you have? Again my point was, you harassed others, called them names and insinuated they were ignorant, because they did not go along with your definition of a tree house. You even posted YOUR definition repeatedly to support your argument, then, proceeded to call them names.
You even challenged one poster to post their definition if it was different then yours. I accepted that challenge and posted 3 sources that disagree with your narrow definition.
Now you are reduced to counting how many say one thing compared to how many say another, to suggest you were 100 percent right and everyone else was wrong? I am sorry but the English language doesn't work that way. All definitions are appropriate to use, whether the majority of tree houses were built as play houses for children or not. The fact is most tree houses are built by kids, as out door escapes, with the help of their parents. Big deal. That does not disqualify the more elaborate ones built by contractors for the rich people as not being tree houses as you repeatedly claimed, and were proven wrong about.
Yes, in a tree. Not propped up by one tree with ten 6x6 posts and concrete footings. If it is connected to the ground by more precut than rooted supports, it is a house on stilts NOT a treehouse.
Not once did I forget my capitals. And the space after an ellipse is such a minor detail....it says more about your pickiness than anything else... Plus I find it way more esthetic.
The "they're, their" mistake is such an ugly, awful, inexcusable one, that I had to correct him, and I was obviously right to do so. It's a common theme and MEME on the internet to call out people who are stupid enough to keep making this dumb mistake.
And second, he's not right.
Wow...you wanna correct me and you f--k that up. Bahahaa what a moron.
And no, a treehouse is a thing that dads build for their kids. It's not a "house" in a "tree".
noun: treehouse
a structure built in the branches of a tree for children to play in.
a structure (as a playhouse) built among the branches of a tree
I already said this on this board SEVERAL TIMES....so pay attention you fvking moron....jesus christ the arrogance.....
Ignorant, hypocritical, unable to recognise your own mistakes and incapable of forming a coherent argument that isn't just a string of insults. Your mother must be proud.
I had a treehouse when l was a kid. Saying oh you're sad because your parents bla bla bla and suggesting that's the only reason we argue points on the internet. How original.
Well, the alternative is that you had no reason to make such a piss poor argument at all. I figured I'd be nice and assume you at least had some sort of excuse, no matter how bad.
But apparently I overestimated you. My apologies for that.
"A tree house or tree fort is a platform or building constructed around, next to or among the trunk or branches of one or more mature trees while above ground level. Tree houses can be used for recreation, work space, habitation, observation or as temporary retreats."
Don't worry. Daddy will build you that tree house one day.
a small building, structure, or shelter built among the branches of a tree
It would seem that the notion that a treehouse is only for children to play in is fading, much like the idea that "cartoons are for kids," an outdated idea which keeps many adults from appreciating the works of Hayao Miyazaki, or the idea that "surfers are bums," which ignore all the money being made by hard-working surfers. Catch up with the times, man!
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure you're not Hitler. - Jon Stewart
reply share
Did u see the definition l found? And there are many more, where they exclusively talk about treehouses as kiddie houses. That's the point l was making. But l myself am about to buy a house, late 30's, and l am gonna build a HUGE skatepark, with a terrasse, a treehouse for my cats, a climbing wall, and a pool. So l'm with you! I just fear that men in the community might bully me for being a child.
No, I didn't. It wasn't all that bad. It has to be really bad before I flag it. Personal threats, pornographic fantasies about child actors, that stuff I flag. I haven't seen you post anything that bad.
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure you're not Hitler. - Jon Stewart
For the sake of definition, I'd have to call these treehouses also. However, I think I know what you're saying because after watching a couple episodes, it just seems that they're grownup toys built from grownup money.
I thought the show was going to wow me, but there's something very disingenuous about these buildings, lost in what we - as kids - wanted from them in the first place. It's almost like going back in time and trying to right a wrong.. and it just doesn't feel right.
It would be nice if Mr. Tree Douchebag visited an daycare, orphanage, abused womens shelter, and built a Kids Treehouse for the kids in those places. Something simple, safe, and fun. Connect it to a jungle gym, etc.
That would be fun. Not some old millionare jerk cheerleading for rich people to build gigantic tree house mansions.
He's done things like that. The treehouse for the kids recovering from cancer, the treehouse for the kids who have lost a loved one. It's easy to fixate on rich jerks having things I can't afford and forget that he's done exactly the sort of thing you're saying he should do.
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure you're not Hitler. - Jon Stewart
Totally agree with OP. The show I just watched the "treehouse" was just a house on stilts built between some trees. NOT a tree house. What a freaking joke of a show.
On another note, what the heck does this show have to do with Animals? The freaking channel is called "ANIMAL Planet".