MovieChat Forums > Indigenous (2016) Discussion > Chupacabra, I don't think so!!!!

Chupacabra, I don't think so!!!!


Those things were not chupacabra, if anything they pose a slight resemblence to the creatures from The Descent.

I'm sorry but chupacabra is an animal like creature not some dead looking naked dude that might be from a different planet than earth.

NUFF SAID!!!!

reply

The creatures portrayed in The Descent were a tribe of chupacabras.





reply

Sorry pal, but what Decent movie where you watching, those were not Chupacabras, would you like to see a pic of what the lore of the Chupacabra looks like

http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/1368507344_el-chupacabras.jpg

So again, sorry that was not a Chupacabra

reply

Nice drawing of an oversized hairy-legged vampire bat (Diphylla ecaudata)feeding on a Brazilian zebu. But the creatures in The Descent depict a rogue tribe of chupacabras, as its explained in the films dialogue between the characters of Juno and Sarah.




reply

your momma a chupacabra.Nah just kidding.

reply

http://www.segnidalcielo.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chupacabra.jpeg



We made a land where crap is king, and the good don't last too long.

reply

Right? The chupacabra is a vampire-like creature that feeds on livestock and unwary humans, not a demon. I'm American but only live an hour or so from the Mexican border and the lore is not necessarily believed but not uncommon to hear around here.

Whoever is saying the creatures in The Descent are chupacabra is nuts. They were a "missing link" humanoid type thing, as there are cave drawings showing them emerging from the ground and hunting (and I believe they were in Virginia, so nowhere near a place the chupacabra would be "found").

They're coming to get you, Barbara!

reply

I'm with you, I also live an hour north of the border, and never heard chupacabra described as anything like these things - including by one guy who swears he chased one away from his livestock. They do look a lot like the things in The Descent - and weren't *they* supposed to be humans who'd acclimated over many years?

reply

But the creature seen in Texas and Northern Mexico is some kind of weird canid. Probably a coyote/wolf(Mexican or Red) hybrid with a genetic defect. It doesn't fit the description of what a chupacabra is supposed to be, so calling it a chupacabra is a misnomer.

reply

Wendigo's are a closer match to the creatures in these films.

reply

There are different versions of what Chupacabra are supposed to look like. Sometimes they're humanoid reptile alien looking things. Sometimes they're hairless dogs.

reply

It was never flat out stated that they were chupacabras... Yes legend spoke of chupacabras in the jungle but that doesn't mean that that was what they were

Had no issue with the monsters, thought they looked sufficient for a horror but everything else sucked

Somedays you just can't dispose of a bomb.

reply