"A person can be well dressed and articulate but that doesn't make them a food critic."
I never said it did make them a food critic. The point was that there was nothing about their appearance, language or demeanor that suggested that they
"obviously have never patronized fine dining restaurants""I based my opinion of the judges on the critiques they have given."
I've heard their critiques and heard them comment on texture, taste, how well flavors complimented each other, how they liked the heat or acidity of certain ingredients ect.. In other words the same critiques, criticisms, or opinions I've heard from every professional food critic or chef, certainly nothing out of the ordinary or that seemed off base or inappropriate.
"Aren't message boards about discussions and opinions?"
Yes obviously they are, I don't understand your point in making that statement, I discussed your post and gave my opinion. What's the problem?
"the contestants are preparing their best five dishes....Masterchef contestants are chosen for exceptional ability and adaptability,....Both shows have home cook contestants, but that's where the similarity ends."
I know the format of both shows. I never said anything about the shows being similar, I only brought up Masterchef and the quality of the dishes because you said,"These judges obviously have never patronized fine dining restaurants
and cook very basically at home." I brought up Masterchef to show that home cooks can cook more than very basically at home. I just didn't see how you could possibly in any way know anything about how these people cook at home based on what we've seen or heard from them.
Victory is Mine!!!
reply
share