MovieChat Forums > Welcome to Me (2015) Discussion > Kristen Wiig fully nude in this?

Kristen Wiig fully nude in this?

posted 10 years ago by HARDCORExxxHARRY
52 replies | jump to latest

Saw this written in an E! article on Yahoo. Hmmmmm

Just another day at the office for old Harry.

reply

[–] DocZoidberg 10 years ago

I'll believe it when I see it.

--------------
Do you smell taters?

reply

[–] Quarantino_II 10 years ago

Exactly. When comedy actresses make a big deal about nudity in upcoming films I tend to smell a rat. Aniston, Bullock... just marketing BS. Not falling for that again only to see three milliseconds worth of of Wiig's naked elbow behind frosted glass in a dark room.

reply

[–] Quarantino_II 9 years ago

Aaaand surprise surprise (not), all references to that scene have disappeared from the trailer.

In the original trailer, which was pulled, there was a clip (with no nudity, obviously, just from the neck up) but you could tell it was the walking-through-the-casino scene. Now when the new official trailer resurfaced, everything is the same except the clip in question has been taken out.

This is gonna be just like Aniston in Wanderlust where they made a big deal about her topless scene and then it was removed.

reply

[–] ChipDouglas (1602) 3 years ago

Welp...

reply

[–] ecrisisny 10 years ago

Spoilers:

She does go fully nude in this after having a breakdown. She walks through a casino filled with people and they all stare in shock. Only the full front is shown though.

reply

[–] neven_l_2000 10 years ago

did you actually see the movie? Did it show her face in the scene so we know it's not a body double?

reply

[–] ecrisisny 10 years ago

Yes I saw it at TIFF and you see her face the entire time as she walks slowly through the casino. It's very obviously not a double or any sort.

reply

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

[–] mmilk-991-864075 10 years ago

how long is the nude scene?...do they really show full frontal nudity of her ??

reply

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Dejay 9 years ago

Just before y'all get your hopes up: Yes she's fully nude but she also has some second degree burn marks lol

reply

[–] Amishelvis1 9 years ago

I am sure there must be pics on the internet from the movie. As the previous poster said there is full frontal, head to toes. No body double.

reply

[–] Hopstimop 9 years ago

Are you all ducking 14 years old or what, being so eager to see her nude?
Just watch your mom showering. It's the same. Both have two tits and a bush between their legs.

reply

[–] facherz 10 years ago

What about Linda Cardellini? I've wanted to see her naked for years.

reply

[–] alek-hidell 10 years ago

Rent Dee Snider's Strangeland.

reply

[–] facherz 10 years ago

Thank you sir, thank you very much.

reply

[–] piperxf 9 years ago

All the other posts about this film, almost all of them far more important than this one (like when will the movie be released), add up to 15 and the Is Kristen going to get nude thread has 12. :)

reply

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] appleofmypie 9 years ago

Can you pretty please tell us what you mean by "low cut" bush? Very trimmed?

reply

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] appleofmypie 9 years ago

First of all, thank you for answering the question we've all been asking. So the bush is there, but not a big bush. Could I ask, is it more or less hair than Katherine Waterston in Inherent Vice? http://www.imagebam.com/image/e6478a380074166

I would consider this a pretty trimmed bush, basically a landingstrip. I hope Kristen is hairier than this....

reply

[–] j_e_f_f_r_ 9 years ago

Part of me wishes that the actual Kristen Wiig reads these posts because I'm sure she would get a huge laugh at how ridiculous some people are....but then a part of me would be worried that many of this "deep bush analysis" would just terrify the poor woman.

Dude, give it a rest. It's a bush. Might as well have your electron microscope with suction cups attached to your TV now just to prepare yourself for that all important bush-inspecting-day that immediately follows you bringing home the blu-ray copy. There could possibly be precious milliseconds lost between opening that blu-ray case and attaching/calibrating your microscope.

I truly believe there was less intensive investigation concerning Bush's possible war crimes than Wiigs "Welcome to Me" bush.

reply

[–] zooymtoo 9 years ago

Part of me wishes that the actual Kristen Wiig reads these posts because I'm sure she would get a huge laugh at how ridiculous some people are....but then a part of me would be worried that many of this "deep bush analysis" would just terrify the poor woman.

Dude, give it a rest. It's a bush. Might as well have your electron microscope with suction cups attached to your TV now just to prepare yourself for that all important bush-inspecting-day that immediately follows you bringing home the blu-ray copy. There could possibly be precious milliseconds lost between opening that blu-ray case and attaching/calibrating your microscope.

I truly believe there was less intensive investigation concerning Bush's possible war crimes than Wiigs "Welcome to Me" bush.

You got that right..
Thanks for saying what needs to be said... and making me laugh in the process.

reply

[–] Duke-56 9 years ago

I would think in this day and age that was a merkin...it was bushy enough....it was a sad scene...she had been burned by a pot of chili...and was having a breakdown...she walked the who room until the EMT girl came and covered her in a blanket.

reply

[–] MrBullo 9 years ago

So, full bush, landing strip or Brazilian?

reply

[–] arod155-1 9 years ago

Cannot wait to see Kristen naked in this movie. She is so sexy. Heard an interview the other day where she was asked how much is shown and she replied "I went all out, you see my vagina in full view"

I'm going to guess a very neatly trimmed bush.

reply

[–] House_of_No 9 years ago

She is probably wearing a merkin, aka a pubic wig, so you don't actually see anything, just the fake hair. Most actresses wear them when they have to be nude. The only major exceptions I can think of are Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct and Julianne Moore in Short Cuts.

******
Nessarose:What's in the punch?
Boq:Lemons and melons and pears
Nessarose:Oh my!
******

reply

[–] plumlogan 9 years ago

Guess you missed this then:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x18z9s1_rosario-dawson-trance-01-1080_shortfilms

Oh, Tobias - you blow hard!

reply

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] appleofmypie 9 years ago

What do you mean exactly by "low cut" bush? Like that the hair is trimmed really short, almost shaved? Or that the bush area is really small? Or is the bush big like a 60s bush? Thanks!

reply

[–] mechajutaro 9 years ago

What about Linda Cardellini? I've wanted to see her naked for years.

Available in Strangeland, if you can stomach the movie in it's entirety.

reply

[–] appleofmypie 9 years ago

Please tell us what "low cut bush" means good sir. Very trimmed?

reply

[–] j_e_f_f_r_ 9 years ago

Jeez people.

The top of her pubic hair starts 154.83 mm below her naval with a width of 57.83 mm at the top and a 34.19 degree downward taper. On the right side she has 4 strands of hair outside of the zone with 7 hairs outside on the left. On the Hamilton-Norwood Hair Density scale she rates a L-3 with 86.45% thickness. The coloring is of a Brown-Hazlenut with a 4.6% tint of Cocoa....

reply

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] neil-476 8 years ago

You are my new hero for this post.

reply

[–] ducksoup (3933) 6 years ago

Huh! I always thought she'd have a funny bush. Well, live and learn.

reply

[–] Quarantino_II 9 years ago

Check the leaked snapshots making their way around the web.

They're meh. Not nice but not ugly either, not saggy but not firm either, they're just... average smallish natural mammaries of a skinny 40-something. They just... exist. It's a Sarah Silverman, Meg Ryan type situation.

reply

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] facherz 9 years ago

I got to say I'm pretty disappointed, I can't fap to this.

reply

[–] mechajutaro 9 years ago

I got to say I'm pretty disappointed, I can't fap to this.

With all deference to Miss Wigg, were you expecting a Botticelli recreation on celluloid?

reply

[–] facherz 9 years ago

Well at least it was not as disappointing as the Scarlet Johansen nudes. Not every nude scene can be a Rosario Dawson in Trance.

reply

[–] FridayOnElmStreet 9 years ago

Thats pretty cool.

reply

1
2