The host is terrible


Has absolutely no charisma and just sits there with his stupid occasional chuckle. He adds nothing. His acting in the stories is fine but as a host he is a zero.

reply

He is a little bit charisma-deprived. But, you know, he's somebody's baby.

reply

Yeah.

I think the show would be better with less him and less of the "historians" hamming it up. Sometimes it seems like they're putting on a show. Just get drunk and be drunk. No need to exaggerate. It's stupid.

reply

Derek Waters looks at his guests like he is going to molest them as soon as they fall alseep.

reply

Asleep

reply

What would you like him to do while other people are telling the story? You want him to talk over them like some sports radio host?

reply

Well does he really even have to be there? That's the point, he adds nothing.

reply

He's there because they're telling him the story. He listens and occasionally he prompts them to keep the story on track.


I've been making fine jewelry for years, apparently.

reply

And then sometimes they take a bath together.

Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

reply

It's a lot more fun having another drunk person around. It would probably be a pretty boring show if it was just one drunk guy trying to be serious and tell a story.


I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to, too.

reply

Layoff man. Derek is awesome

reply

He created the show, organizes the re-enactments and chooses stories (usually) specifically catered to his fellow comedian friends with whom he gets drunk and films the narratives.

That is the point and premise of this show, which is clearly not suitable for your elegant standards.

reply

He's there to let the guest tell the stories. He tries not to intrude so much.

reply

You're wrong.


Derek, keep on keeping on

reply