Please get real! They were a couple of ugly, uneducated thugs. How much are we willing to suspend the reality of a true story? I can understand a purely fiction story, on any subject. But this crap!? Come on people! Get real A&E!
Just Google the real Bonnie and Clyde. They were a couple of dogs. Not some hot couple making out and being rebels. More like rabid mental dogs that needed to be put down.
Narrator: Modern speech had degrated down to a mixture of slang, hillbilly, and grunts. - Idiocracy
My thoughts exactly. I'm astounded at how they and their crimes have been glamorized in these TV ads we're being hammered with. Nice role models for kids to look up to, huh?
they came up during the great depression when there was no jobs and very little hope. so there is something interesting about a bunch of people saying *beep* it. getting there hands on some tommmy guns and going out to start *beep*
i told you not to stop the boat. Now lets go. Apocaylpse Now
It was a freaking movie get over it ... It's not a documentary . Like any non- documentary , it's based on actual events and people . Without embellishments and glamorizing and some beautification , it would be boring . When you watch a western movie you really thinks that's how the West was ?? Lol
Yes, they were horrible human beings. They were thugs. They were criminals. But they were madly in love. You can't make a Bonnie and Clyde film or series without romanticizing their relationship.
Couple of dogs? Not exactly how I'd put it. Bonnie was 19 and for all intents and purposes little more than a scared kid, she was scared of everything, threatened to leave Clyde, tried to. And Clyde? Yeah it was low to shoot down cops, but fine upstanding citizens all of his victims were not, several of them were prisoners who brutalized the smaller prisoners. There's also to be taken into consideration the lengths he went to NOT to kill people when and if it could be helped, ALSO to consider that one of the killings of the gang was NOT his intention, in fact he'd given the order to let the man go, but the gunman didn't follow his orders.
It's all VERY easy to say NOW 80 years later what somebody we never met was, or what they should've done or what WE would've done if we lived 80 years ago in a different world and how we would've been the guys in the white hats dutifully doing whatever the right thing was and slowly wasting away doing so, but it's largely posturing and a lot of speculation. The truth is we really don't know how different of choices WE would've made if we were living in a time when most of the country was without jobs, money or food.
Your argument became irrelevant after you brought up the fact that they KILLED people. It is wrong. The only way it would be right, is in some extreme circumstances. Self defence of yourself or a loved one.
Narrator: Modern speech had degrated down to a mixture of slang, hillbilly, and grunts. - Idiocracy
Couple of dogs? Not exactly how I'd put it. Bonnie was 19 and for all intents and purposes little more than a scared kid, she was scared of everything, threatened to leave Clyde, tried to. And Clyde? Yeah it was low to shoot down cops, but fine upstanding citizens all of his victims were not, several of them were prisoners who brutalized the smaller prisoners. There's also to be taken into consideration the lengths he went to NOT to kill people when and if it could be helped, ALSO to consider that one of the killings of the gang was NOT his intention, in fact he'd given the order to let the man go, but the gunman didn't follow his orders.
It's all VERY easy to say NOW 80 years later what somebody we never met was, or what they should've done or what WE would've done if we lived 80 years ago in a different world and how we would've been the guys in the white hats dutifully doing whatever the right thing was and slowly wasting away doing so, but it's largely posturing and a lot of speculation. The truth is we really don't know how different of choices WE would've made if we were living in a time when most of the country was without jobs, money or food.
Exactly! I agree!
Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize! reply share
I'm not watching this movie. I'm sick of the romanticizing of these two as well. They are always portrayed as these hot, beautiful rebels who were going against the system because the system was wrong. Society supposedly made them criminals....please. My life hasn't been perfect either, I didn't turn into a criminal or killer. Were suppose to like them and look at them as heroes. They killed people and their families mourned. If there was a Bonnie and Clyde around today, you would hate them and want to see them in jail, especially if they wronged you or your relatives. You don't romanticize criminals today so why do it with past criminals?
well holiday grainger is adorable so it would be tough for the real life bonnie to match up, but come on, she wasn't that bad, it was the 30's, didn't everyone in the Midwest look like that (-:
All young criminal lovers on the run are going to get this treatment so that's kind of a given. And the true facts of the couple is that they were young, relatively attractive, had limited opportunity and by all accounts were truly devoted to one another.
But also by all accounts their time together was bleak and miserable. It was not a fun ride for them. Glamorizing their life is a complete fabrication.
In the last months of their lives Clyde literally had to carry Bonnie around because she'd never recovered from a battery acid leg injury from a shoot out. They should portray the grim reality of always being on the run. The driving for days with little sleep. The emptiness of never being able to settle down anywhere.
If you read the correspondence and writings of the pair you might be surprised that they seemed pretty well educated.
I read that too - about Bonnie's leg injury. I never knew that because it doesn't fit into the glamorization of their story. Many famous criminals were smart, Ted Bundy, craigslist killer, alot of white collar criminals... I thought Clyde was slow and they did show Bonnie with mental issues. There was a reason they ended up together in reality. But I think we can all agree their lives were miserable and any movie made about them has parts not based on fact.
well we haven't seen the second half so I think its early to judge how they portray them....so far I don't see how they've romanticized clyde....they've shown him raped in jail, chopped off a couple toes and hobbled for life to get out of jail when he was going to be released anyway...not exactly my idea of a good time
A good an historically accurate read on the pair is "Go Down Together" by Jeff Guinn, which graphically tells of Clyde having to carry Bonnie around, put her on and off the toilet,and tend to some very intimate needs after the leg burn incident. Her leg muscles atrophied due to the fire and she was never right again. A labor of love, maybe, but not very romantic in my book.
In the last months of their lives Clyde literally had to carry Bonnie around because she'd never recovered from a battery acid leg injury from a shoot out. They should portray the grim reality of always being on the run. The driving for days with little sleep. The emptiness of never being able to settle down anywhere.
They did portray that reality. But because it was a movie, they don't have time to dwell on it, but it was certainly there.
I, for one, didn't watch it and think that their life was glamorous. I can see how some might, but it seems a bit of a stretch...
Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize! reply share