MovieChat Forums > Love Is Strange (2014) Discussion > R Rated? MPAA Fail (again)

R Rated? MPAA Fail (again)


Why would this movie, with no sexual situations, no violence get an R rating, thereby eliminating a good sized audience?

you say you'll change the Constitution well, you know, we all want to change your Head

reply

Maybe for strong language? Christ, people are condemning the MPAAfpr being "homophobic" when in actual fact, they're the ones assuming that it's just because the characters are gay. I'd actually be more concerned if they'd given it a PG-13, just trying not to look homophobic.

reply

Good points NP13, but that's the way it's going anymore with people like the OP leading the political correct battering ram. They intend to steamroll all that's imagined to be in their way.

I see Stupid People...

reply

I have never seen a movie given an R rating because of strong language.

Ever.

Historically people have tried to find rationalizations whenever people start seeing and pointing out signs of systematic prejudice in order to root it out and clean it up. For a long time many people will try to defend it, deny it, justify it, and mock those who recognize it. Eventually they quiet down when they see their side can't survive.

Don't be on the wrong side of history. You're playing out roles that have played out for centuries. It's never boded well for the justifiers.




Movies are IQ tests; the IMDB boards are how people broadcast their score.

reply

kay_rock: "I have never seen a movie given an R rating because of strong language."

There are MANY examples, and here is one dubious example: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116242/

reply

Went to a screening last night featuring a Q & A with the director & he stated it was entirely due to the use of the expletive "motherf*c#@r".

reply

It's a godamn shame that one word can limit the audience like that because it is a sexual expletive. I guess it's too late to edit out the "mother" part. I actually only just heard of this movie but now I would really like to watch it, sounds really good.

reply

Actually it 's the F____ part.

There are simple rules. You can Google them. It's all laid out in black and white.

There are sometimes exceptions made, when an appeal is made. But generally, them's the rules. And the movie makers know it going in. They may actually WANT the R or PG-13 rating.

reply

I find it funny that people are getting all upset at the MPAA for being "homophobic" for rating a movie with strong language for "Language". The producers/Directors should be aware of the way the rating system works and make the movie accordingly. It seems the director of the movie understands why his movie received an R rating.

reply

The beauty of being a niche film with a small budget is that it doesn't have to chase after box office. Anyone put off by an R rating wouldn't see this film anyway. The writers and director have the luxury of saying, "Screw the rating!" The last thing we need is directors kissing MPAA ass.

reply

They're not put off by the "R" rating.

They're simply trying to have this movies message of gay love reach as young an audience as possible. That's not so complicated is it?

The gay agenda knows you've gotta convert the young, because they are the future

I see Stupid People...

reply

God you're dumb...

reply

...and you're a dutiful drone.

Political Correctness Is Paralyzing Us From The Brain Down...🇺🇸

reply

But of course! All of us who are not driven by hate, fear and superstition must be drones...

Accepting and respecting difference has nothing to do with political correctness, it rather appeal to things called empathy and humility, concepts you must surely associate with weakness in your puerile little mind...

Anyway, there's no arguing with the likes of you, so godspeed raging little boy, keep your bible close and your gun closer, Jesus will come get you soon enough...

reply

"But of course! All of us who are not driven by hate, fear and superstition must be drones...

Accepting and respecting difference has nothing to do with political correctness, it rather appeal to things called empathy and humility, concepts you must surely associate with weakness in your puerile little mind...

Anyway, there's no arguing with the likes of you, so godspeed raging little boy, keep your bible close and your gun closer, Jesus will come get you soon enough..."


I love how you say "all of us," empowering yourself by imagining the majority stand behind you and hoping they'll step forward, in your defense. I don't hate or fear gays and as far as I'm concerned, they are free to live their lives as they choose. The only thing I oppose, is the PC movement to make homosexuality seem to be as natural and valid a choice as being heterosexual, which it's not! Part of that PC movement, is to legalize same sex marriage and adoption.

Now, since you feel free to make far-reaching assumptions about me, I'll do the same. Ironically, your attitude isn't devoid of hatred or rage... your comments to me have been hateful, insulting and angry. You appear to be an angry, closeted homosexual, that has chosen atheism to escape the guilt of your chosen path.

The last thing you said, sounds like a thinly veiled threat...

Political Correctness Is Paralyzing Us From The Brain Down...🇺🇸

reply

I love how you say "all of us," empowering yourself by imagining the majority stand behind you and hoping they'll step forward, in your defense.

Believe me, I don't need anyone stepping up in my defense, especially when facing an intellect of your "cough" stature...

The only thing I oppose, is the PC movement to make homosexuality seem to be as natural and valid a choice as being heterosexual, which it's not!

A choice, really, you're still stuck on that bs? I have an idea for you : why don't you go read a book (other than your precious bible I mean) instead of spewing your pitiful ignorance online?

You appear to be an angry, closeted homosexual, that has chosen atheism to escape the guilt of your chosen path.

I think I can rest my case now...

reply

Yes, you should've conceded long ago 

Political Correctness Is Paralyzing Us From The Brain Down...🇺🇸

reply

^ Defeated.

reply

And a liberal whiner comes along, closes his eyes and wishfully says "defeated," as if wishing makes it so.

Political Correctness Is Paralyzing Us From The Brain Down...🇺🇸

reply

^Defeated again.

reply

The only thing I oppose, is the PC movement to make homosexuality seem to be as natural and valid a choice as being heterosexual, which it's not!

I'd just like to point out that if you feel you have a choice as to what sex you're attracted to, it means you're bisexual. You may feel you have a choice, but I guarantee that the vast majority do not.

reply

Good point, because I've definitely never been attracted to men. On the other hand, could it be that homosexuals are sexual beings, that chose the path of least resistance? Meaning they didn't get enough positive feedback from the opposite sex, so they moved on?

It seems apparent now that the attraction to the back-end of animals isn't voluntary either or to little kids.

I now understand how homosexuality could be seen as a mental health issue.


Yea, Tho I Walk Thru The Valley Of The Shadow Of Political Correctness...🇺🇸

reply

Some may be gay because they got no response from women; hard to say. But, given the large percentage of gays who are attractive, it couldn't be the main reason. It's a much simpler explanation that they're attracted to men the way women are because of physiological issues.

Something is a mental health issue when it interferes with living a reasonably comfortable life. In general, homosexuality doesn't interfere except when other people make it a problem.

reply

...you are stupid people. This is not a movie that would appeal to many very young folks, language or not, and regardless of sexual orientations of characters. Do you honestly think that watching a story about two men who love each other will 'turn someone gay'? How, then, have there been any gay people all these centuries, when it was quite rare to see any story having to do with gay people? Wouldn't all those straight characters turn all those potentially gay kids straight?

You have weird ideas. "The gay agenda." Oy.





Multiplex: 100+ shows a day, NONE worth watching. John Sayles' latest: NO distribution. SAD.

reply

"This is not a movie that would appeal to many very young folks, language or not, and regardless of sexual orientations of characters. Do you honestly think that watching a story about two men who love each other will 'turn someone gay'?"

It's not a movie that should appeal to anyone, but yes, only someone with flawed reasoning skills would have trouble hypothesizing that exposing kids to homosexuality will(over time) brainwash them into believing it's perfectly natural. And the more accepted and normal society makes it appear, the more popular homosexuality will become. Why do you act like that's a radical concept, when many people think exposing kids to violence will make them prone to that? Try using your brain!

Here are some statistics from a gallup poll of 120,000 American's. "But what’s notable is the huge increase in homosexuality among the under-30 crowd. The results show 1.9 percent LGBT in those 65 and older, 2.6 percent among 50 to 64 year olds, 3.2 percent among 30 to 49 year olds. Under 30, however, the rate of homosexuality suddenly doubles, to 6.4 percent.

Moving on, I see you're a theater fellow. I always heard fairies love that stuff. Alternatively, you're bio screams, you're a woman, and for you're sake, I hope you are.

"You have weird ideas. "The gay agenda."

I have weird ideas? "The gay agenda" is a weird idea, as if I made it up? It's been said "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled, was convincing the world he didn't exist" and then you scoff at the mention of "the gay agenda," as if I made it up.

"You have weird ideas.

Well You speak weird! "Oy," WTF is that?

If you're not American, you shouldn't even be arguing with me, because I speak of the situation in the USA. I have very little knowledge of homosexuality worldwide, as a foreigner would have very little (to no) knowledge of our situation.

Yea, Tho I Walk Thru The Valley Of The Shadow Of Political Correctness...🇺🇸

reply

Well if its for the language than its just silly, theres hardly any profound language in there and secondly why are you americans so extremely sensitive when it goes to language and have this silly rating systems.

reply

This isn't the first time the MPAA has given a film an R-rated just for language. As ridiculous as it might be, it's nothing new. Not sure why everyone is getting all wound up.

reply

Why would this movie, with no sexual situations, no violence get an R rating


The film contains at least one use of the word "motherf@cker", which automatically leads to an R-rating.

reply

They said MF in "Draft Day" which was PG-13.

reply

It was R originally, and re-rated on appeal. And apparently that was the only use of strong language in the entire film, whereas this movie is a little more liberal in terms of profanity.

reply

Have to have at least 2 f-bombs to get Rated R, and even then there have been movies with 2 f-bombs that got Rated PG-13.

reply

Maybe because it is a move about perverts. Oh you say I'm 'homophobic'?? Really? In order to be 'phobic' about something wouldn't I have to FEAR that thing? The only thing I FEAR about homosexuality is that is will be considered 'normal behavior' when in point of fact it is a mental disease of the deviant kind.
Yes, I know, I'm a 'troll', from some perspectives, but I see myself as a lonely voice in the wilderness crying out for Absolute Truth whilst surrounded by 'p.c.' sheeple' who are owned by the devil.

Life is a journey not a destination. Fear nothing.

reply

but I see myself as a lonely voice in the wilderness crying out for Absolute Truth whilst surrounded by 'p.c.' sheeple' who are owned by the devil.


What you are is a living proof that God either simply doesn't exist or that he's a hack...

reply

Something's messed up when you have a movie like The Hunger Games where children kill children gets a PG-13 rating and the use of the word "MF" gets an auto-R rating.

reply

Almost every scene in Hunger Games with kids getting killed is shown in shaky cam. You can't tell what the hell is going on, let alone see any impact. The only two you can see properly are from bow and arrows, and they're bloodless.

................
"Fine. You want to eat? Let's see if you can eat... PIZZA!!!"

reply

[deleted]

It's quite clear that the film got the rating due to language. I doubt this has anything to do with challenging the MPAA's homophobia. It's less likely the case given how close we are of approaching Egalitarianism bit by bit. Those who think otherwise are simply seeking for the attention.

reply

Because there are essentially only three ratings. PG, PG-13 and R. Almost nothing gets a G or NC-17 rating anymore and really only children's movies get a PG. So yeah, movies with highly disparate levels of offensiveness are going to get the same rating.

The MPAA's rules may be stupid but they are the rules and according to the rules that's the rating it had to get. All they had to do was cut the language and re-submit it, happens all the time. But that wouldn't get them in the news.

reply

The MPAA's rules may be stupid but they are the rules and according to the rules that's the rating it had to get. All they had to do was cut the language and re-submit it, happens all the time.


So far the only reason given for the "R" rating is for profanity. They could've appealed the rating. Indeed, if the MPAA rejected the appeal, there could be a substantial reason to use this film as evidence for the organization's blatant feelings towards gay content when it comes to rating films.

reply

"It's quite clear that the film got the rating due to language."

But that's just what isn't clear, despite the director's belief. Many movies have not been given an R rating even though one, sometimes two, MF expletives were used. Some have been mentioned in earlier posts. I think it's quite valid to ask why this particular movie was rated R. I strongly suspect it was the combination of epithet and subject matter, in which case, yes, it's an MPAA fail.

reply

MPAA fail indeed. I really wonder what the hell is wrong with them. One utterance of MF gets an automatic R whereas so many garbage PG-13 movies contain plenty of violence and yet they don't get a R.

Every one who works for the MPAA deserves to be stripped naked, tied to poles and have rotten fruit thrown at them for a full day. Maybe then they would get their heads out of the dream world they live in and wake up.

John Lithgow and Alfred Molina are two of the best actors I've seen and I've enjoyed every movie they appear in. I'm sure this movie is no exception.

Everyone needs to see This Film Is Not Yet Rated (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0493459/). It shows the MPAA for what they are: a bunch of idiots. Oh wait, everyone can't see it. It's rated NC-17.

Okay my rant is over. Time to crawl back under my rock until the next idiotic news pops up.

Have a nice day.

Long live the 70's!

reply

Fine but it has nothing to do with it being about gays. Like I said, all they had to do was cut the profanity and resubmit but they're trying to turn this into some anti-gay nonsense.

reply

The MF is used at least 6 times - that's why.

reply


Ratings matter to me. An R rating tells me this movie has a more serious "grown up" theme to it that does not appeal to noisy teenagers who want to take screen shots with their smart phones.

A PG or PG-13 rating will tell me this is a silly feel good b.s. romantic comedy type trash that I run from.

reply

I don't think kids would enjoy this movie anyway so I don't care what it was rated. There are movies like Billy Elliot rated R that have excellent messages for teens as well asThe King's Speech. Can't say the same for LIS.

reply

That's the problem

One use is alright, kids can hear it.
3 or even 6 is evil and kids are not allowed to hear the same word they already have heard in a PG-13 movie.
So parents beware, don't play two PG-13 movies in a row. Your kids might hear the word MF twice. Oh no! It goes against MPAA regulations.

Same goes for sexuality, nudity or violence
Nipple is evil, multiple nipples is graphic
A head shot with brain splatter is evil, shooting 3 people in the head is graphic.





This page will make you a smarter member --> http://www.imdb.com/help/boards/markup

reply

So parents beware, don't play two PG-13 movies in a row. Your kids might hear the word MF twice. Oh no! It goes against MPAA regulations.


😊

reply

Every one who works for the MPAA deserves to be stripped naked, tied to poles and have rotten fruit thrown at them for a full day

Hear, hear !

reply