But there were only 8 people total in the theater. It wasn't terrible, had a few funny moments. The charm of the first one was greatly missing though.
shareOne of the guys in my theatre looked like he fell asleep.
Also, the girl two rows in front of us fell asleep as was snoring loud enough for us to hear.
It wasn't bad, but it definitely wasn't good. Its something you rent.
The first one was clever and funny. This one was just a potty-mouth mess. I want my hour and a half and ten bucks back...
I'd like ten thousand marbles please.
I thought it was enjoyable enough, not as consistently funny as the first but still worth watching. The jokes for me were hit or miss with admittedly more misses than hits. But the jokes that did make me laugh were memorable enough for me to occasionally think about them and chuckle to myself.
shareThat's terrible, but even I decided to pass on this film when it was originally in theaters.
This is one of those rare moments where I actually listened to the negative reviews from the critics, so much so that I just now got around to viewing it.
In my opinion, it wasn't bad, but it wasn't good. It was mediocre at best. It really lacked the charm of the first film which had the '80s nostalgia attached to it. That, and no John Cusack.
I'm surprised it took that long. It's awful.
share