MovieChat Forums > Darkest Day (2015) Discussion > Another Z flick? Is there a quota for th...

Another Z flick? Is there a quota for this crap or something?!


Somebody needs to tell these clowns that we've seen enough Z movies and shows to last a lifetime. Every "filmmaker" with 500 bucks, 10 gullible friends, a little sister with a makeup kit and a handycam thinks to themselves "I just gotta make me a found-footage flick or zombie movie -- I mean, like, how hard could it be, right?" WRONG! Don't fûckin' do it because no one outside your immediate family or a couple of accidental YouTube users wants to see it!!!

💀 The Faceless Men

reply

I can never get enough zombies, if they are good ones. Haven't seen this one yet. But found footage, I am beyond sick of it. That and the night vision shaky cam. I hate that stuff with the hatred of a thousand burning suns.

reply

I couldnt agree more, Z movies are a plague on the film industry when they are done wrong, Darkest Day is just one of these, but found footage films... those I really dislike, no plot and no skill needed...
It was a nice refreshing change to the genre when Found footage came to the screen, with Blair Witch, like it or hate it, it was wonderfully done on a shoes string budget, now we have all these wannabe's running around making trash movies.

Z movies however is still a strong genre, but they do need a few key factors to make them worth the effort, good actors/director/makeup/script and a plot, this film failed on most those factors, look at World war Z, complete waste of time, even with good actors it still flopped, and it had a huge budget, I liked the movie, but as a whole it failed also.

I think that Dan Rickard did use some interesting techniques while making this but not enough to make me sit through it again, oof scenes/shaky camera and poor dialogue and wth happened to the plot? its like watching 28 days later in a comic strip.

reply

Just finished watching this. What a waste. There wasn't much plot and they never really gave a good look at most of the Z's. Stupid ending, too. I've seen so much better. Just another forgettable waste of time. Could have been good with the right script. I would have liked to have seen the lead mutate and turn the whole group into mutated super Z's. That might have been something to watch. Blah, on to the next film.

reply

[deleted]

I can't recall seeing a zombie in recent years and I watch nearly everything that gets released in the US. I believe the last one I saw was World War Z in 2013, and I have high hopes for the sequel directed by David Fincher. There appears to be a big following anticipating it's release, so it's safe to conclude that people have not had enough of zombie movies.

reply

You watch "nearly everything that gets released in the US" and you haven't seen a Z flick in years?! Dude...dude...c'mon. We're plagued with them! I believe you mean you watch nearly ever major release, otherwise you wouldn't be talking nonsense. 99.9% of them are small-time indies.

It's safe to conclude that you don't know what you're talking about. Have a nice day!

💀 "That fückin' Flowers." - Lucas Davenport

reply

Well, what zombie movies have you been seeing? If there are so many, name some of them.

reply

http://www.imdb.com/search/title?at=0&keywords=zombie&sort=moviemeter,asc&title_type=feature&year=2015,2015

💀 "That fückin' Flowers." - Lucas Davenport

reply

Omitting the movies with 0-50 votes, almost none of those are zombie movies. Hotel Transylvania? Haha. The other ones I've seen are A Christmas Horror Story, which had nothing to do with zombies, and The Maze Runner, which has people infected by a virus but not zombies.

reply

There are hundreds released every year. You don't know anything about zombie films.

💀 "That fückin' Flowers." - Lucas Davenport

reply

Weird that you can't name any when there are supposedly hundreds of them. You are clearly wrong. There has likely been far more vampire films in recent years than zombie films.

reply

"There has likely been far more vampire films in recent years than zombie films." lol

Okay, once I clear what I'm doing I'll do this properly. Hopefully Thrillz-Killz beats me to it. He's the zombie movie expert. Man, you really don't know sh!t about films.

💀 "That fückin' Flowers." - Lucas Davenport

reply

http://www.imdb.com/list/ls009192864/

And another 100 titles in the last two or three years that I've rated that were too sh!tty to even add to that list(under a 4/10)and add another 100 titles that were so obviously bad looking that I couldn't be bothered wasting so much as a single KB of bandwidth attempting to watch.

You obviously don't watch much film and certainly don't keep up on horror flicks, zombie flicks are so prevalent they're impossible to ignore.

reply

That's quite an exhaustive list. It averages out to less than 10 zombie films each year, which is very far from supporting the claim that "there are hundreds released every year." Have you really seen all of those? Some of them haven't even been released, and a quarter of those on the list have less than 500 votes.
Considering you love zombie flicks so much, how do you feel about OP saying no one should ever make another zombie film? 😄

reply

That's quite an exhaustive list


Yeah, that's the point, the bulk of that list is from the last decade alone so your "math" is a tad off, it's a ridiculously oversaturated film genre that's beat to death.

reply

That amount of completely *beep* films is pretty amazing, though, lolz

reply

Not to be too much of a stickler but that list contains a lot of films that are not what people normally consider zombie films. For example, Underworld: The Awakening is not a zombie movie.


Sig, you want a sig, here's a SIG-sauer!

reply