MovieChat Forums > Freier Fall (2013) Discussion > Fun and insightful interview with the ac...

Fun and insightful interview with the actors


Here are two enjoyable Interviews with Hanno Koffler (Marc) and Max Riemelt (Kay). I did my best to translate, but english isn't my first language, so bear with me.

The first interview can be found here (in German):
http://blog.interview.de/Max-Riemelt-Hanno-Koffler



INTERVIEW: Your movie 'Free Fall' was the opener of the section Perspektive Deutsches Kino. How was the premiere?

MAX RIEMELT: Was a great screening.

HANNO KOFFLER: Maybe they are all lying, but we got the impression that everyone was delighted. There was a lot of applause, kind questions and a nice atmosphere during the screening. The people were really into it.

INTERVIEW: I found it awesome, too.

KOFFLER: Cool.

INTERVIEW: I had reservations, though. When I read that 'Freier Fall' was about two policemen who tragically fall in love in the province of south Germany I thought: Oh boy, 'Brokeback Ludwigsburg'! But afterwards I was convinced. And that's mostly because of you.

RIEMELT: Thank you.

INTERVIEW: You are so convincing.

RIEMELT: We got this compliment a few times already. Credibility.

INTERVIEW: Because you are not really shy. In other gay love movies that are aimed at a larger audience usually the actors only kiss each other on the cheek.

KOFFLER: I agree, if you're doing it, do it right. But the cheek was also involved at one point, ha ha.

INTERVIEW: What made you decide to get involved with this movie?

RIEMELT: The script was a great basis of course. Then I liked the fact that the story is not about a seduction, but that two people are actually falling in love, with everything that comes with it. And when it was certain that I would make the movie with Hanno I could imagine myself doing it.

INTERVIEW: Why?

RIEMELT: Yes, because otherwise the idea to do such scenes with an other man would appear very abstract to me. But we got to know each other a year ago during a shooting in Marocco, and became friends, you could say...

KOFFLER: Yes, you could say that...

RIEMELT. ...and so I could imagine this quite well, or rather, I was really keen on playing that part.

KOFFLER: Yes, and the script dealt with the topic in a way like I haven't seen it before. That although it is about some kind of homophobia because of the police setting it becomes less and less what the movie is about.

INTERVIEW: And what is the movie about in your opinion?

KOFFLER: About someone with a very narrow conception of his life that he has to blast open because he falls in love with another man.

INTERVIEW: Incongruously he's just about to become a father. To me this seems to be the bigger conflict here. After all, the term gay is brought up rather late in the movie.

KOFFLER: Yes, but of course that's relevant. He's a cop, and I believe he's the last one who could have imagined to fall in love with another man. And that's of course very exciting for him. And you don't know what will happen to him later, the future is left open.

INTERVIEW: Even more vague than the developement of Hanno's character is the one that you play, Max. We don't really know anything about him.

RIEMELT: Exactly.

INTERVIEW: Or do you know more?

RIEMELT: You don't really know...we built a story, of course, that tells us where he's coming from and where he's going. But we wanted to retain the great mystery. Because that's what it's like when you get to know someone. You know little and you can project all your dreams and desires onto that person.

INTERVIEW: There's pleasantly little explanations in this movie in general. A lot is told through pictures. That's absolutely atypical for a german movie, where usually everything is explained ad nauseam.

RIEMELT: And unfortunately often through not so intelligent dialogue.

INTERVIEW: Most of the times movies such as 'Freier Fall' mean much more than the story they are telling, do you see that as a problem?

KOFFLER: What do you mean with 'such movies'?

INTERVIEW: Well, I mean gay love movies. My thought concerning 'Freier Fall' was for example: 'Why does a gay love story that wants to reach a mainstream audience always have to be tragic? It could have a happy ending just as well.' And yet I find the movie great and I know of course that one movie can't answer all questions.

RIEMELT: That's right, often these kind of stories are told along cliches because otherwise the viewer apparently isn't willing to go with it. But why not say: 'It doesn't matter if it's about a man and a woman or a man and a man, the main thing is how they're looking at each other and how they interact.'

KOFFLER: The drama in this story mainly comes from the fact that the movie is set in the province and that the two of them are policemen.

RIEMELT: If the movie was set in Berlin or an other big city it would naturally tell a different story.

INTERVIEW: Isn't it strange that the parts that you play are never played by gay actors? At least when the movie is aimed at a large audience?

KOFFLER: Is that so? I don't even know which colleagues are gay.

INTERVIEW: That's the problem.

KOFFLER: But is that even important?

INTERVIEW: Well, it shouldn't be, but unfortunately it is.

RIEMELT: And this also resonates in the movie, the fact that sexuality stands in between because you look at everything through these schemes.

INTERVIEW: Certainly you get asked a lot what it was like to shoot the love scenes.

RIEMELT: Yes, exactly. And that's entirely legitimate. People are interested in these things, that's how it is.

INTERVIEW: But such questions are daft. I would never ask a man and a woman a question like that. That's why I don't ask it now. Even though I'm extremely interested.

KOFFLER: Come on, ask it.

INTERVIEW: Okay: Is it more difficult to shoot a love scene with Hanno than with a female colleague?

RIEMELT: It's different. I didn't have this before in this form, and so it was extremely exciting, because my ambition is relatively high, especially regarding authenticity. Then I have to be convinced that I could fall in love with a man theoretically, even though I feel more drawn to women. But that was the challenge. I think it's awesome to be able to do these kind of things in your job. And there's only a little overcoming necessary in order to get physically close to someone. And then it affects the viewer already. That's the beauty of it.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


In the second one they are interviewed by fellow actress Henriette Mueller who did the movie 'Auslandseinsatz' with them. The German version is here:
http://blog.interview.de/Max-Riemelt-Hanno-Koffler-1



MUELLER: I have the feeling without 'Auslandseinsatz' it wouldn't have been possible to do such an intense and intimate movie.

RIEMELT: Absolutely. Especially as the idea to play a gay man appeared abstract to me at first, and when you don't know the director and what he will do with it, then it's important to have someone at your side that you can rely on. For me there wouldn't have been any other than Hanno.

MUELLER: Hanno, you were already set for the part?

KOFFLER: Yes, but when they said that Max would be invited for the part of Kay I thought: 'Oh, that would be great.' And then we were at the casting together, and that was more...

RIEMELT: ...a confirmation.

KOFFLER: Yes, a confirmation. When he entered the room it was clear that the movie has to happen with us.

RIEMELT: The movie is almost a sequel. Hanno, do you remember the scene in 'Auslandseinsatz' where we departed?

KOFFLER: The moment infront of the bus?

RIEMELT: Yes, we are standing face to face there, and all you're thinking is: 'Any moment they'll start kissing.'

KOFFLER: And we didn't even know that we would work together again.

MUELLER: I watched the movie again today, and I find it incredible how much you are actually yourself in 'Freier Fall. At least I haven't seen any other movie with you yet, where you are so much Hanno and Max.

KOFFLER: Really?

MUELLER: Yes, which is insane because you fall in love with each other in the movie - but you are so natural there. A thing I noticed that you have in common, by the way, is your ambition. In many things you are very different, but this ambition...phew!

RIEMELT: What zodiac sign are you?

KOFFLER: Aries. And you?

RIEMELT: Capricorn.

KOFFLER: Which ascendant?

RIEMELT: Lion, haha.

KOFFLER: I'm double-Aries. Well, yes we are both very ambitious, but ambition can turn into tension pretty quickly.

MUELLER: Good that you bring that up. Because sometimes you tend to go there. And then Max is is the one who gets you out of it. You complement each other really well.

KOFFLER: That's right. You could say that I approach things too much with my head and take them apart thoroughly with my mind.

RIEMELT: And I'm the intuitive lightheaded one, haha.

KOFFLER: It was so funny when we arrived at the hotel at the beginning of shooting the movie...

RIEMELT: ...Hanno had already plastered the whole wall of the room with memos of the scene sequences.

KOFFLER: Yes, in fact of every scene. So I was well up in what will happen when and where, the whole script, everything, bam, bam, bam! But then you have to let it go. Preparation is very, very important, but then you have to fly, fall, and into freedom.

MUELLER: And with Max you let yourself in for it. You wouldn't be able to do this with anyone.

KOFFLER: Yes, exactly. But I grab him by the hair as well, he won't escape me. He can't fool me, he has to pay in cash, too.


I'm very happy to see people interested in the movie and the interviews, so I translated the rest of this second interview (it was only available in a print magazine) and posted it below in this thread (it's apparently too long to put here).



reply

thank you for posting this

reply

I also wanted to thank you for translating and posting this. Really glad I got to read these interviews. Danke sehr!

"He shall be an adder on the path, to bite a horse's heel"

reply

Thanks for your great work.

reply

You're all very welcome. :-)



reply

Thank you for translating. Very interesting.

reply

Another thank you for the translation ; thoughtful of others on IMdB. Not usual on this board!
Forgive my schoolboy German of many years ago but, vielen dank!

reply

I'm with the others - thank you so much for the translation. I've been using Google to translate as many articles as I can find, but it doesn't do a very good job. This was a breath of fresh air - your English was terrific.

At the moment I am using Amazon Turk to get the audio commentary from the Blu-ray translated in to English. It's not going very well, but if I get anything like a result, I'll post it on the board.

reply

This is the rest of the second interview that was only available in a print magazine. I translated it because I'm happy that you are interested in the movie. I hope you enjoy it. :-)

MÃœLLER: Have you ever thought about where you are the most different from each other? Max, in what points have you trouble understanding Hanno at all?

RIEMELT: I can't say at all. It's more that I admire how he's so structured and fights for things. I function differently. I like to view at things separately. Hanno on the other hand has his head full with every information and carries it with him everywhere.

MÃœLLER: You mean that he looks at his life as a whole whereas you live in the moment?

RIEMELT: It's definitely that in certain moments he always keeps a clarity while I like to cast it off sometimes.

MÃœLLER: Is this also about dicipline?

RIEMELT: I wouldn't mistake it for dicipline. I'm diciplined as well. I only look at the things separate from each other and want to keep the single moments as pure as possible. That's boon and bane.

KOFFLER: And I'd like to have more of that sometimes. Or more again, of the ability to let go and live for the day and not always question everything. Well, I had a wild time in my life, very early and very extreme, and someday I pulled myself out of that consequently. Since then I'm searching for a down-to-earthness inside me, because in work and also in life I always have the fear that things are slipping from my grasp. The fear of the groundless.

RIEMELT: Of the loss of control.

KOFFLER: Right. And to see that Max can do both, let go and still stay in control, that's nice to see. Then I gladly let myself be taken along with him.

MÃœLLER: Kidnapped.

KOFFLER: Yes, exactly. Kidnapped, seduced, and pulled into the free fall. But afterwards I have to get back to the shore quickly.

MÃœLLER: In the first love scene in the woods Kay, the character of Max, downright assaults Marc, the character of Hanno, and afterwards the dynamic between the two changes completely. Marc then downright claims what Kay offered him.

KOFFLER: Yes, when you don't live out something for a long time and then get a taste of what was forbidden, then it's like a liberation, then you need more of it. And Marc also doesn't know how long the offer will stand.

RIEMELT: There's a big clumsiness and naivete in this of course. It's like a kid in a candy store that's eating sweets until its stomach hurts.

KOFFLER: And Kay, Max's character, draws him over to him: Don't think about tomorrow! Live in the moment!

MÃœLLER: And now we're back to the topic...

KOFFLER: And then he's taking the moment and stumbles so hard with doing so. Because lo and behold: of course the moment always has an effect.

MÃœLLER: Absolutely! One of my favorite moments in the movie is when Max asks you if you ever thought about going away and make a fresh start somewhere. Have you two ever thought about doing this?

RIEMELT: In my case it's that my work gives me the certainty that I'll get out regularly, so that the longing for a place or a country doesn't even come up. There was once the idea to move to a friend in London to work on motor scooters. But this disappeared into thin air.

MÃœLLER: Awesome, to work on motor scooters...

RIEMELT: Yes, to do something different. Because since I was 13, 14 I've always done the same. Played many different roles, always jumping into something and then out again.

MÃœLLER: Which can be very schizophrenic.

RIEMELT: Oh well...

MÃœLLER: Well at that age...

RIEMELT: Yes, I conditioned myself early, that's why it isn't that hard for me anymore. I also don't fall into such a big hole after the shooting anymore. I can enjoy the time between shoots very well.

MÃœLLER: I didn't understand that sentence to be about some kind of move, but about the wish to change one's life and to get involved with something new.

KOFFLER: That's a heavy question. Because sometimes the art, the work and life are connected so much like you have never thought before. Well, I'm in my early thirties, and my life is changing radically at the moment. Do you experience this sometimes, that you play a character and suddenly you have this thought: 'Wait a moment, that's not possible that I of all people am playing this exact role right now!'.

MÃœLLER: Absolutely.

RIEMELT: That partly comes from taking your job seriously. When you deal with a certain topic acutely you start seeing it everywhere.

KOFFLER: Frightening. Then you can't tell if life adjusts to the role or the role to life... My character Marc for example loses his former life and family in the movie, and absurdly after the shoot the same thing happened to me. I didn't expect it, but I lost my established life after the movie. And all you're thinking then is: crass!

MÃœLLER: That's super extreme. I'm getting goosebumps.

KOFFLER: And regardless of the fact that the movie is about the love between two men, 'Freier Fall' is also about how a young man with family has to sort out his life completely anew. And that was a conflict that caught up with me so bad that it's totally absurd. And because of that 'Freier Fall' has another level for me privately.

MÃœLLER: This topic isn't totally new to you either, Max?

RIEMELT: Yes, absolutely. And to reconcile all this is getting harder and harder. That what you experience and who you get to know has so much influence on you, I simply underestimated that. You look at life designs and let yourself be inspired by them and at the same time you become unsure about what you live and what you think is right. I had it very easy, because at a certain point things just kept being offered to me. I just had to say yes or no. And I can't help but ask what would be if it wouldn't have worked out that well, when I would have come up myself with what I wanted to do.

MÃœLLER: What your life design would be?

RIEMELT: Yes. And I'm very unsure about that, more specifically, I just wouldn't know.

MÃœLLER: That's basically also the topic of our generation. I asked myself recently if I know anybody who's in a functioning relationship that's working towards something. Don't know any.

KOFFLER: Do you have any friends with a child who are still in that relationship?

MÃœLLER: Well I know no more than one.

KOFFLER: Recently I was at Max' and we're looking around and realize: 'Wait a moment, are we really five fathers here? And are we really five fathers who aren't together with the mother of their child?' It seems to be a total normality. And I haven't yet found out if that's good or what that means. If our society and our idea of family maybe is changing completely. And if the generation of children that are growing up right now will have a totally different concept of family than we have. Maybe everything will be more free.

MÃœLLER: Do you actually always have to hurt to be happy? I thought about if the life decision that you make...

KOFFLER: Who are you talking about? The roles, the characters?

MÃœLLER: No, in private life. But in the movie it's practically the same: To be happy he has to hurt her. He discovers the love to this man, and he has to go this way to find his happiness. And she stays behind, hurt.

KOFFLER: I don't know if for him it's primarily about finding happiness. It's more that Marc, because of his experiences with Kay, can't go back to his previous life. But he doesn't know what will happen then. First he has to free himself from his former life.

RIEMELT: To find happiness, I believe, you have to be relatively consequent. I, for instance, am a person much in need of harmony, and that's exactly what's very hard for me. Of course there are always more diplomatic ways to get your feelings across, but if you want to accomplish clarity, you can't avoid injury. But these aren't injuries that you do deliberately.

KOFFLER: And often there's not the courage to say that you simply don't know what's going on with you.

RIEMELT: Because you want to protect yourself.

KOFFLER: And I'm asking myself: 'What are we protecting ourselves from?' You can see it in the movie as well, when Marc is trying to say what's going on with him.

MÃœLLER: 'It's so tight inside.'

KOFFLER: 'It's so tight', he doesn't find the right words, the interpretion of his wife is there already, so he reacts strange again, he's got the feeling that he's being misunderstood, she has the feeling that he doesn't open up, bam, bam, bam. That is the way of human communication where I'm thinking: *beep* Don't say anything! Words gone!'

RIEMELT: Because everybody comes from their own reality, their own logic.

MÃœLLER: Because it's so diffcult to imagine that there's an other reality.

KOFFLER: Yes, unfortunately you always view the world only with your own eyes... It's so funny to me that we're talking ourselves into a rage here.

MÃœLLER: We're good at that, aren't we? And I think it's great that you have such long hair now, Hanno, and that it sticks out instead of lying sludge on the head.

RIEMELT: But then there's a lot of hairspray in it.

MÃœLLER: By the way, the kiss at the hospital, and then Marc's mother who comes around the corner, that's so crass. That's this moment where you wished the ground would open and swallow you up.

KOFFLER: And how the mother, Maren Kroymann, is looking out of the elevator, this expression. At that point there's always this murmur flowing through the theatre: 'Geez!'

MÃœLLER: But then the movie is also so incredibly funny. But Hanno thinks it's only me who finds it funny because I know you two...

KOFFLER: I don't think the movie is funny, not at all.

MÃœLLER: But Max, tell me, you had lots of fun, I can see it in the movie.

RIEMELT: Of course, but the atmosphere is quite heavy, which doesn't mean that we didn't have fun shooting.

MÃœLLER: Well, the scenes in which Max provokes you...

KOFFLER: Yes, Max' glances are quite... Well, I can laugh about it when I distance myself from the story, when I see how Max is playing it. But when I put myself into Marc's shoes, the laughter is sticking in my throat.

MÃœLLER: It's the little moments in between that are so much fun. And I believe I wasn't the only one in the audience who laughed. For example when Max comes around the corner with the joint and you say: 'You're not serious, are you?' And you mean it like that, because to you it's completely absurd to smoke a joint in the police academy. But Max doesn't even respond to that. He doesn't respond to you at all because he knows you'll take a pull anyway.

KOFFLER: You mean it's obvious for Max' character Kay.

MÃœLLER: Okay, it's obvious for Kay. He knows that he can wrap you round his finger and that you will cross this line with him, because you both have crossed it already. He knows this, and that's so exhilarating.

KOFFLER: What, he knows it already?

RIEMELT: You only think that because you know us and adjust us with our roles.

KOFFLER: Yes, you adjust it. You already start laughing because Max comes around the corner and flirts with Hanno. Jette, you don't have the required distance, haha. Look, there's Hanno! And there, Max! Aren't they hilarious?

MÃœLLER: Well I wouldn't have imagined that the interview would end this way. Hahaha!








Watch Blackfish (2013)

reply

PrivateBozz, you are too good to us. I really enjoyed this interview. It all got so deep for a moment, esp. when Hanno alluded to his own personal life falling apart after the film, but I did enjoy two of them scolding the interviewer for viewing the film featuring Max and Hanno instead of Kay and Marc!

Thank you so much for a great translation.

reply

I can go along with your response Stephen.
Such consideration on IMdB is rare these times.
Danke schon!

reply

You're welcome! There's another interesting (and a tiny bit more intimate) interview I found, and I'll post it the next days, maybe tomorrow if I find the time.





Watch Blackfish (2013)

reply

This is terrific! Thank you so much PrivateBozz, something to look forward to.

reply

Awesome!

reply

So, as promised another interview with Hanno and Max, this time from the gay magazine 'Männer' and providing some information that I'm sure will entertain you. The german version can be found here: http://m-maenner.de/2013/05/wir-haben-uns-lieb/


Inaugural question, boys, are you fond of each other? (PrivateBozz note: actually the interviewer uses the german term 'sich liebhaben' which isn't easy to translate; it's kind of a childlike version of 'love each other' and often used by parents when they tell their children that they love them, then they say 'Ich hab dich lieb' instead of 'Ich liebe dich')
(both are laughing)
Koffler: If we are what?
Riemelt: If we are fond of each other/love each other.
Koffler: Well, yeah.
Riemelt: You can say that.

And you have known each other for ten years, right?
Riemelt: Yes, we were shooting 'Hallesche Kometen' together back then.

But you haven't been friends that long, have you?
Riemelt: No, we only became real friends when we shot 'Auslandseinsatz' in Morocco together two years ago, a movie about young soldiers. That was hard, not only physically, but the atmosphere on set was also a little like summer camp and it was a lot of fun to spend time with Hanno. During the shootings, but also generally, when you had free time together and got to know Marrakech. And that's how friends for life find each other.
Koffler: But we already knew each other, respected each others work and liked one another.

Was the fact that you are friends good or bad for the shooting of 'Freier Fall'?
Koffler: In retrospect it would almost have been a requirement even, because I can't imagine playing it with anybody else. It was ideal.
Riemelt: For me there wouldn't be an alternative to Hanno either. Of course you could play this with an other colleague as well, technically, but to convey being in love in a believable way requires a certain form of familiarity that you can't create at a moment's notice.

Do you find each other handsome?
Koffler: Well, Max is a very handsome colleague, a fine man.
Riemelt: And Hanno doesn't have bad breath.

Is that the requirement for believable gay love scenes: to not have bad breath?
Riemelt: You have to think practically there. (grins)

Hanno, were you scared to take another gay role after 'Sommersturm', where you played a confident gay man, because you might get typecast?
Koffler: Nonense. First, it's been a long time since 'Sommersturm', and second I start by looking how interesting the material and the role are, how good the script is, and how much I can apply myself to it. And with 'Freier Fall' I just found the story great. There is someone who questions himself, completely, discovers himself anew, also with a new, just awakening sexuality, makes first experiences in that department, and subsequently asks himself questions about his identity. What body parts he has to deal with specifically didn't matter to me. I found the script amazing, the story great, the developing triangle constellation extremely fascinating, but didn't worry about it maybe being a gay story again. It's not about that.

Max, while shooting the movie you said in another interview, I quote: 'I'm playing a gay cop currently, complete with *beep* totally awesome.' Was it awesome?
Riemelt: Things like that you also say to provoke. But it was actually awesome, yes. I've wanted to play a gay man for a while.

Why?
Riemelt: Not for 'having played a gay once', but to get into such a character and get it across in a believable way, from inside myself. Also to widen my range, and because as an actor it's about to be able to be at home in every character, that's obvious. You don't want to be typecast as the womanizer. But I didn't look for a gay role by hook or by crook, it took a while until something fit. Because I didn't want to play a character who's a poncey cliché (PrivateBozz note: I don't know if that's the right word, he uses 'tuckig', which is meant to describe the overly effeminate way some gays are acting) and has to show the audience every five minutes through some idiotic action that he's gay. I wanted a character who has this sexuality, but in whom I can nevertheless find myself. And when I read the script of 'Freier Fall' for the first time there were many points where I recognized myself in Kay.

Where exactly?
Riemelt: In his teasing of Marc, whom he winds up because he likes him. In Kay's character, that seems relatively quiet and laid back, but has turmoil inside. There's a lot of me inside of this.

The sex scenes in the movie are very well done and totally believable, which is rare in movies featuring gay characters. Why is that?
Koffler: Whe tried out a lot, even though we didn't have that much liberty regarding camera and light because of the almost Dogma-esque conditions. Everything was supposed to be natural.
Riemelt: But in the end a movie comes to life at the editing table as well, and there I think it's very important that someone like Monika Schindler edited the movie, who made it work for both genders, because it's not gay or hetero but simply beautiful and intimite.

Do you find these scenes erotic yourselves, when you watch them?
Riemelt: I find them very aesthetic and on this level really beautiful, but not erotic. I'm not into the bodies of other guys, because I'm hetero after all, but I can see quite well if the interaction of the male bodies in front of me is working. And that it does.

Was it strange to play that, especially since you're good friends?
Koffler: On the contrary. Here it was important as well to know each other well. Because then it's much easier to let yourself go while you're playing, because you simply feel very safe. It's not only with the love scenes that we both don't like to make compromises in our work. And there it was good that we could trust each other, but also our director Stephan Lacant.

Max, did it bother you that your character is always the one that's passive during sex?
Riemelt: I don't see it like that at all. I talked about that with the director, and in our understanding I'm letting it happen, but at the same time I'm in control, because I am the experienced of the two. For Marc this is all new, it's not that he can just straight on... Kay introduces him to the things they do together...he calls the shots, because he is...

The word you are searching for is 'Powerbottom'?
Koffler: I always knew you are something like that. What was the word again?
Riemelt: Powerbutton.

Bottom.
Riemelt (laughs): Powerbottom. You learn something new every day. I didn't know that.

Would I be wrong if I said that Kay is the one who wants Marc first, but Marc is the one who falls in love with Kay first?
Riemelt: If you want to see it that way, yes of course it can be like that.

How did you play this emotional curve?
Riemelt: You don't know what will be decided at the editing table afterwards anyway, you can have the most beautiful thoughts, during editing there's reshuffle and you're out.
Koffler (laughs): I'd like to contradict colleague Riemelt there. You do set up the role in a certain way.
Riemelt: Yes, of course. But it's still decided during editing what glances are kept and what are not, and that can decide how the characters come across and if the focus in a certain scene is somewhere else suddenly than you've thought.
Koffler: That's right.

Does Kay seduce Marc?
Riemelt: Of course, he does. But not really in a conscious or platitudinous way. It's just a program that's running, paired with a very real interest in the person and an incredible sexual attraction. Love comes later, but it's a smooth transition...
Koffler: You can't separate sexuality and love anyway.

Many gay men would object here.
Koffler: I don't believe that you can separate that.

So you're only sleeping with women that you love?
Koffler: Well, in that moment.
Riemelt: Aha. (laughs).
Koffler: There are many variations and variants, in love as well as sexuality. I still wouldn't want to separate that.

If you want to separate is a different question.
Koffler: But I really don't believe that you can separate this.
Riemelt: I think it's important that there remains a secret. I can't rationalize it down like this, unriddle it. For me there are many factors involved that I don't want to disentangle because something might get lost...

Why doesn't the story of 'Freier Fall' have a Happy Ending?
Koffler: It does not?
Riemelt: It's a matter of opinion, I like it that the question isn't fully answered. This is what makes the movie so thrilling after all.
Koffler: That's simply how it is in life: the big crises hurt, but hidden inside of them also lies the significant personal development. Welcome and farewell. That's like it is in the movie as well. Marc has to say goodbye to some things, beliefs, habits, has to question things, but with doing so he widens his actually extremely narrow horizon enormously. After the story with Kay he'll never ever say: 'You belong into that category, and you in that one.'

Throughout the whole movie I was asking myself if the character is actually gay.
Koffler: Is that so important? I especially like the fact that it isn't clear.
Riemelt: That's the approach of the movie after all. Can and do you always want to say it so clearly, aren't there hundreds of grey scales, isn't it actually much more differing? Aren't feelings and sexuality much more complex than: 'You slept with this person, so that's your inclination, so now you are this and that.' These distinct deductions and labels are something I have problems with.
Koffler: I like it that the movie macerates this and deals with it differently.

Is this why it's important that only far into the second hour of the movie someone is asking Marc the question weather he's gay?
Koffler: The question is important, because of the consequence that arises from it. Hopefully the audience ask themselves the question: What if he would be? What would this mean for his life, his relationship, his fatherhood? Is only the one possible? Is everything else then not able to happen anymore? If they take some of these questions with them and answer them new for themselves, then that's something already.





Watch Blackfish (2013)

reply

Another great read - this one really does get to the nitty-gritty. lol power "button"!

I liked how the interviewer challenged them in places, though I thought there was a slight contradiction in Riemelt's assertion that " I'm not into the bodies of other guys, because I'm hetero after all" which doesn't quite fit with his later thought that "Can and do you always want to say it so clearly, aren't there hundreds of grey scales, isn't it actually much more differing? Aren't feelings and sexuality much more complex than: 'You slept with this person, so that's your inclination, so now you are this and that.' These distinct deductions and labels are something I have problems with."

I suspect that the latter is an honest expression when given some thought, but perhaps (like so many people) when it comes to one-self, the belief is that there is no grey-area.

Really enjoyed this one. Thank you PrivateBozz.

reply

Many thanks to you, PrivateBozz. I'm really appreciated and enjoyed your interview translations, very insightful and funny at times. (I just found and fall in love with this film a week ago.)

reply

Wow awesome. I wish American men talked like this about films and sexuality.

reply

I don't know, man...I just get the feeling these two actors developed something off-screen, too. Just read between the lines of some of their responses to the interviewer. Just my intuition but there seems to be something going on. More than just friends.

reply

I know my best mate and I are much closer than most male friends, but he is straight and there is nothing sexual to it. I think it is possible to develop a deep brotherly-love without there being anything sexual to it. More than just friends, as you say, but nothing to suggest anything like we see in the film!

reply

They were completely on the same level with what they wanted to achieve and what they wanted to show (high authenticity), and this paired with the real familiarity that already existed between them as close friends seems to have aligned them on a deep level. Plus the bottle of vodka. :-) They both stripped themselves down in front of each other and us imo, and that's what moves us. This might sound nuts to some, but I believe in the end we are all spiritual beings with no real gender, and I have the feeling that a lot of the emotion that we see on screen comes from some sort of intimacy between souls who share an intense experience.





Watch Blackfish (2013)

reply

KC, bottle of vodka, my ***!!

They could never have been convincing if they hadn't some special feelings, no way.

I also got a feeling something was between them off-screen, 101%! Well done for posting your response, as I feel you have hit if not bulls eye not a mile off it!

reply

Stephen, PB and Ron,

Thanks for your responses and I agree with each of y'all's assessment. Their connection was extremely soulful and spiritual, transcending the sexual aspect of it - no doubt about it. I think that is why they touched so many of us on a very deep level. They brought me to my knees! I craved and yearned for them to be together.

Still, I can't help but think they had some sort of physical relationship in reality. Hanno said his role played out in real life at the same time with the breakup of his real-life mate/family. Wonder why. Could his life truly be imitating art in more ways than one...?

Ron - thanks for the kudos! I've broached this subject elsewhere on other FF discussion boards only to have it ignored or shot-down entirely.

reply

That was quite sad reading about Hanno's relationship failing (though he seems to still have a good relationship with his daughter, thankfully). But he didn't go in to any details on it. I suppose it's possible, but I just think not terribly likely.

I seem to remember Jake Gyllenhaal was subject to a great deal of speculation after Brokeback - it might come with the territory after films like this. Max certainly seemed to nail is orientation flag to the mast (only later to say that no-one can be pigeon-holed like that!).

reply

Still, I can't help but think they had some sort of physical relationship in reality. Hanno said his role played out in real life at the same time with the breakup of his real-life mate/family. Wonder why. Could his life truly be imitating art in more ways than one...?
I doubt it, but we don't know and I don't think it's important (though it would be an interesting thing to know..). They'll always be the two actors who had the courage, ambition and vision to do this challenge together with full dedication, completely with all it took - and totally knocked it out of the park. The question if they actually have or had a sexual relationship becomes a rather mundane thing in comparison, and maybe I'm wrong here, but I bet when they look back at their lives someday this experience will outshine many other.





Watch Blackfish (2013)

reply

Excellent points! My sentiments exactly. Truly courageous (and the others). You really nailed it with that assertion. It goes to show the excellence of both actors' abilities and talents in this craft.

reply

I'm wondering why exactly this is so addictive to some people including myself, this portrayal of raw emotion and passion, I don't want to let it go. When the movie came out last year I was living in Berlin and had the opportunity to watch it a few times in theatres (small arthouse types though). Eventually it got better, but now I'm back suddenly simply because I got a notification that someone posted in one of my threads, I came back to this forum to read it and got into the movie yet again - argh! I'm getting the DVD next week and can't wait to view it with the audio commentary.





Watch Blackfish (2013)

reply

Man, it's comforting to know I am not the only one who became immediately addicted to the narcotic-like shot to my veins this film had on me. I could say I "came back" to it like you did, but really it's never left me, even when I wanted it to. It's an unfathomable obsession to me, even though I do have a life.

Something about Max/Kay & Hanno/Marc...Timeless tragic love story so expertly brought to life. Just can't let/won't let go.

reply

Yeah, feels good not to be the only one.




Watch Blackfish (2013)

reply

Ditto that!

reply

I think it just recently came out on Netflix as a streaming option - that's how I came to watch it. What a find. As soon as I watched it once I ordered the Blue-ray from Amazon (a German import). It was so nice to get that, with the deleted scenes.

I was really looking forward to the audio commentary, but feared it wouldn't have a subtitle track on it - I was right. I paid some people on Amazon Mechanical Turk to transcribe the German commentary in to English text, but sadly they didn't do a perfect job (don't get me wrong, it is worth a read, but there appear to be large chunks of dialog missing from key scenes, and quite a few mistakes from what I can tell).

If anyone wants to have a go at filling in the blanks, let me know. I can upload the text for others to read.

reply

Here's a rather lame effort of an English transcript of the commentary.

http://freetexthost.com/5by35a34cu

[EDIT: You can ignore the FF01 etc. section breaks in it - originally I took the first half and split it in to 10 parts and requested a translation, then I picked the best translator of those that did it and asked them to do the last half (FF11).]

reply

I'm currently visiting a friend for a few days, but when I get the DVD and am back home I'll look into it. Maybe Thursday or Friday I'll have some time to check it out. Looking forward to it. :-)






Watch Blackfish (2013)

reply

It struck me the commentary track seemed to lag the scenes on the screen, at least on the Blu-ray, but it may just have them talking so much they couldn't keep up. Still, I'm so pleased they did a commentary.

reply

Says a lot for their acting that you think Max & Hanno have something going on sexually off-screen. I respectfully disagree.

That they are close friends, that they have an extraordinary on-screen chemistry in this movie, definitely. But romantically involved in RL? IMO, no. And thank God the German press isn't as interested in them as the vultures in the US media would be. Their speculation about Jake's sex life was revolting.

reply

Some of us think perhaps the 2 leads had a relationship of sorts, nothing more definite than that very maybe/possibly/could be/are they or aren't they/did they/didn't they
Speaking personally, if I weren't gay, I could never imagine even acting the part of a gay man and doing sex scenes with another man, however sexy or handsome he was. Just could not for my Life do it. Hence the speculation. It would be like me being expected to act as a passionate male lover with an actress on-screen, rolling around with her in the buff! Pay me big bucks and couldn't do it. Some closeted actors do of course and convincingly, and maybe HK and MR are just consummate in their chosen professions, but we can still be open to possibilities.
I wouldn't say US Press speculation about JG was "revolting" - don't think Jake saw it that way either. Alas, it comes with the territory, so to speak.
Ok, at times it gets salacious, but as actors, they can't court the press and paps, and gossip mags one day, and then yell and complain about invasion of privacy the next. Life ain't like that!

reply

[deleted]

JG admitted many had remarked they thought him bisexual, but he said he didn't find that idea at all offensive and would not therefore reply further. (Matt Damon once said something similar).
Rumours started at a major awards ceremony in USA with Jake, when a very close male friend of his had been heard to call him in warm terms "babes" as he left their table for the stage, and other Celebs at nearby tables, had looked at one another and said something like, did he just call Jake, babes, O.M.G.!
Could have been in jest, and/or because his mate was tipsy, but that was part of the reason rumours started, and as far as I know, JG has not done anything to dispel these rumours, again mainly because he said if he did, it would infer there was something wrong with being gay or bi.
Look at the rumours surrounding Travolta and Cruise which won't go away - that's Hollywood. Who knows where the Cruise rumours started.
The crowd on here aren't so tough with you, KC. Quite a friendly board actually. Try other boards and you risk a real tongue-lashing! I once went on Henry Cavill's board well over 1 year ago, and his girlie fans lashed out in all directions at me, as they did back then with any male commenters. Poor guy, with fans like these, as they say..............
So, you're still fine on here, no worries.

reply

you're right about the US press about JG not being revolting - I actually think it was fan sites that did the most egregious speculation.

As for you not being able to do sex scenes with a woman: that's why they are actors. They can do that...I know Max said he has no formal training, that he doesn't trust that type of prep for acting, and obviously his work doesn't suffer for the lack of it. Hanno studied acting at the Max-Reinhard-Seminar in Vienna until 2007.

reply

No genuine 100% straight men can do what they did in FF love scenes regardless of how top caliber actors they are! Truly Straight men by nature are just not wired to engage in anything like that... not even the 'it's just acting argument' can justify it for them.

reply

Speculation,and insinuation, again.
I can look back to "Sunday Bloody Sunday", filmed around 1970. The 2 leads were Peter Finch and Murray Head. One played a gay doctor and the other was a bisexual student, and aspiring designer. Both actors were openly heterosexual and they played gay scenes (not as intimately as in FF)very effectively. (The film is still available on dvd, great acting by the way).
I know this will disappoint, but some actors can and do take on gay roles, "in the name of art". Ok, you couldn't do it if you weren't gay and neither could I, but we are not professional thespians.
No amount of wishful thinking can change that fact of life!
We just can not start insinuating actors are possibly gay(or bi) because they once, even twice, acted in gay roles, for goodness sake, especially when those actors have stated publicly that they are run-of-the mill heterosexuals.
Colin Farrell as Alexander? Brad Pitt as Achilles? Heath Ledger or Jake Gyllenhaal in Brokeback? Matt Damon or Michael Douglas in Behind the Candelabra? Get my point now or are you still saying they are all really latent gays or bisexuals? Dangerous ground my friend!

reply