Plot holes retconned?


Was the different models of the red queen retconned or is there an actual in-universe explanation?

The paraplegic guy from Apocalypse had like no bearing on the company, the virus development or its outcome?

We never got explanation how things went bad between the end of 5 and beginning of 6 and what happened to all the other characters? Such as Chris?

How could chopping off Wesker's leg have had that effect on him if he was mutated/enhanced?

How much of the Story of resident evil was planned and how much was just made up as they went?

reply

Was the different models of the red queen retconned or is there an actual in-universe explanation?


Since you see flashbacks of her creation, the implication is she's supposed to have always looked and sounded as she does here.

The paraplegic guy from Apocalypse had like no bearing on the company, the virus development or its outcome?


It would seem to be the case. A fan theory to make sense of it, is that he merely developed the Anti-Virus shots used in the first movie and therefore was considered expendable (especially if Umbrella have always had a full blown cure).

We never got explanation how things went bad between the end of 5 and beginning of 6 and what happened to all the other characters?


It was heavily implied everyone in Washington died, with the exception of Wesker and Alice.

Such as Chris?


It's weird that his sister didn't have anything to say about that! It's almost like Anderson decided to ignore as much as possible from movies 4 and 5.

How could chopping off Wesker's leg have had that effect on him if he was mutated/enhanced?


Same here. This Wesker, seems to be the Wesker from part 3, meaning no powers; that part is ignored from RE4 and 5.

Curiously, while Alice agrees to go to Raccoon City because the Red Queen promises her revenge on Wesker, when she gets there she largely ignores him and only really cares to deal with Isaacs.

How much of the Story of resident evil was planned and how much was just made up as they went?


Very little planned, but that's not the problem.. You don't have to have planned in great deal to simply be able to account for past characters, at the very least by mentioning their status!

reply

Thank you for the responses.

Regarding the last question, I was more curious about how they were able to bring it full circle and made Isaacs the actual bad guy rather than Wesker, and made Alice a clone for her story and tied that back to the beginning of the company. I mean, they never really gave her a past, but how much of that was incidental and how much of it was planned or left so they had an opening they could use later.

reply

Don't search for reasoning... the director didn't care, he does not expect his target audience to care either. For some odd reasons there movies make money so they kept asking to write new ones so he probably just said yes to get another huge paycheck. Didn't tough 2 secs about what happened in the part movies. Used the laziest way possible to do action scenes (shaky cam and tons of stunt doubles) and probably realized the shaky cam didn't hide enough so he added 10 jump cuts per punches...

When a director clearly don't even care of delivering a good product visually, you can expect the story is last on its mind lol.

Alice is the worst character of all time, she need to die in the last movie. Chris/Jill are RE !!!

reply

Business decisions. Iain Glen, thanks to Game of Thrones primarily, but also other things like Jack Taylor, is now a huge actor compared to when Extinction was released.

He's a lot more bankable to a general audience then Shawn Roberts as Wesker. Ergo, we end up with this dumb storyline where he's the bad guy and Wesker does practically nothing in the film, despite being the antagonist in 3, 4 and plays a large part in 5.

"The Final Chapter" is also a good sales pitch; the movie is left entirely open ended for further films and the film does not really conclude any storyline definitively with the exception of Alice's backstory.

Don't try to find deep logic in it. I've tried, and I've brute forced a storyline in my own head that takes the past movies into account and still makes Final Chapter make sense.

As far as I'm concerned they all died at the White House, the end, because Paul WS Anderson went too far *beep* all over the fans with The Final Chapter.

It's a lazy cash grab that ignores half of the storyline built up between 1 and 5 for the sake of a convenient 'ending'.

reply

The paraplegic guy from Apocalypse had like no bearing on the company, the virus development or its outcome?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It would seem to be the case. A fan theory to make sense of it, is that he merely developed the Anti-Virus shots used in the first movie and therefore was considered expendable (especially if Umbrella have always had a full blown cure).


It's been a while since I've watched, but I remember Dr. Ashford sending Alice to rescue his daughter Angie from school in Raccoon City. I could have sworn he was given the same exact backstory about developing the T-virus to cure his daughter's disease as Dr. James Marcus and his daughter Alicia in this movie.

Up until this point, I thought the Red Queen was modeled after Angie Ashford.

reply

You are mostly correct regarding Ashford, and mostly incorrect regarding Angie.

Let me explain:

1) About Ashford being the T-Virus' creator or not:

In RE2 we finally learn why Ashford is important when the survivors find Angie. Alice discovers Angie carries with her several shots of the Anti-Virus and their conversation goes like this:

Alice: How did you get this?
Angie: My daddy. My daddy made it for me.
He's sick. And someday, I'll get sick too. He just wanted to stop that.
When I was little I had to walk on crutches. They said I'd never get better,
just worse. He found a way to make me stronger.

Alice: The T-virus.

(We are not shown Angie nodding or otherwise responding to Alice's above statement at all because we see images of the flashback of Ashford working on his computer etc.)

Angie: Then they took the invention away from him.

Flashback: Get out of my house!

Angie: He's not a bad man. He didn't mean for any of this.


As you can see Angie explicitly says that her father made her the Anti-Virus, and is only implicitly agreeing with Alice about the T-virus.

If you remove that line by Alice, you can read the whole exchange as referring to the Anti-Virus. The T-Virus on its own would be useless, if Angie didn't want to turn into a zombie, so if he invented the Anti-Virus so that she can safely take the T-virus, that is still "a way to make [her] stronger".

So you can pretend that Angie wasn't sure about who the inventor of the T-Virus was, and she thought she might had been her dad, that's why she didn't correct Alice. But what she knows 100% certain, is that he made the Anti-Virus.

Also consider that Major Cain shot dead Ashford to motivate Alice to fight Nemesis. Would he had shot the creator of the T-Virus, Umbrella's most prized possession? But what if Dr. Ashford merely created the Anti-Virus? Then perhaps he is expendable.

Now, of course, all that is nothing but fanwank. At the time RE2 came out Ashford was absolutely intended to be the T-Virus' creator. But if ones does decide to attempt to fanwank, the above theory works not that bad actually.

2) Regarding Red Queen's connection to Angie:

In the commentary of RE2 Anderson says that in an earlier draft of the script Angie was supposed to have been the model of Red Queen, and Ashford perhaps helped build Red Queen's supercomputer. They tried for a long time to make it work, but because they needed extensive flashbacks to the original movie, and because the people in the audience that never saw it wouldn't care, they decided to drop the idea. So in the film itself, Angie is no longer considered to be the basis of the Red Queen as she once was in earlier drafts.

reply