MovieChat Forums > The Fault in Our Stars (2014) Discussion > How beautiful is Shailene Woodley on a s...

How beautiful is Shailene Woodley on a scale of 1-10?


On looks alone and at her best.

Make mine Marvel!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

With long hair, she's a 10. Short hair...pretty but not a ten.

============================================

Have you read THE BOOK OF LIES? Read the latest story for free! RISING -- an Easter Island mystery and a tale about an ancient god that rises out of a volcano... READ IT HERE --> http://bookofliescomic.webcomic.ws/comics/144

reply

5

reply

A very solid 8. And I actually like her better with the short hair!

reply


8 with long hair, 6 with short.
_________________________________
"I'm sorry, but.." is a self-contained lie.

reply

7.5

reply

Nailed it.

reply

7.5

Derek's 19 personalities eat you alive while raving about art house cinema.
-Movie_Buff_Brad

reply

she pretty much defines the concept of "average" which makes her a solid 5.

Some people have very low expectations and rate average girls as 10s.

Youll find that people who would rate her a 10, probably rate more than half the women they see as 10s, which means their scale is wrong. If everyones a 10, than 10s the new average and you need a higher number to define the few at the top.

reply

Opinions are subjective. If people are a 10 to them, then so be it.

I think your scale is wrong with a 5 after all.

See how that works?

reply

she pretty much defines the concept of "average" which makes her a solid 5.

Some people have very low expectations and rate average girls as 10s.

Youll find that people who would rate her a 10, probably rate more than half the women they see as 10s, which means their scale is wrong. If everyones a 10, than 10s the new average and you need a higher number to define the few at the top.

Bad math my friend.

I guarantee if you took a random sampling of 250 woman across the country, had men vote on all 250 woman + Shailene Woodley, and look how Woodley scored relative to the other 250 woman, she'd be in upper 25-percentile. This testing method negates improper usage of a scale.

Proof I am right? Consider 60%+ of American woman are medically classified as overweight, you're 5 looks foolishly out of touch with reality of American woman.


_______
When logic and science aren't on your side, you always lose.

reply

Ok that might be your opinion but I would more agree with that poster than you.

If you had men vote for 250+ woman she maybe would fall closer to 250 than 1 or even ten.

She is a solid 4. She isn't ugly but she isn't drop dead gorgeous either. She is just average.

Their are slightly overweight or "healthy American" (Note that most healthy American woman wouldn't be healthy outside of the US) woman who are rather attractive. Their are also rather ugly thin people. So I don't even know what you are getting at with that.



Barbara Stanwyck and I used to ride the trolley! ~Andrea Zuckerman

reply

So I don't even know what you are getting at with that.

That people are using a 1-10 scale, with five being a mean of expectation, not a median (percentile) scale.

Most people's 1-10 scale would have majority of the population under three or four: a lopsided graph, when it should look like a bell curve.

If Woodley is a four, that means that six-in-ten other woman are more attractive; and that if you walked around and picked out the first ten woman you saw, six would be more attractive than Woodley.

_______
When logic and science aren't on your side, you always lose.

reply