THIS 'FILM' IS HORRIBLE!
Historically inaccurate throughout.
Writing could've come from a 7 year old with G.I. Joes
Acting was worse than every Uwe Boll movie combined
WHY CAN'T AMERICA HAVE ANOTHER GOOD WWII FILM!?
>Americans carrying British .303s and German G43 rifles (though they did have Thompsons and 1911's), Germans carrying Thompsons and vintage WWI Vickers machine guns.
Neal McDonough is seen (as a LINE OFFICER) with colored insignia on THE FRONT of his helmet without a commissioned officer's vertical bar on the back (don't worry, the non-coms don't have them either) and a 1990's ERA WEST POINT FOOTBALL PATCH ON HIS BLOUSE.
Every U.S. soldier has WWI era A.L.I.C.E. gear, and almost every German's wearing a WWI German helmet. Phrases like "boots on the ground" (Vietnam), "air force" (post-WWII) and my favorite...
Lt. Conti says, "Army beat Navy, 23-7..." on December 16th, 1944...The Game was over December 2nd, 1944, giving exactly two weeks for correspondence? Conti's an intel line officer, he would've known about that a day or two after it happened if he was a West Point grad...which he's wearing a damn 90's Army patch so he'd better be.
Tom Seizemore needed money.
The German sergeant Donny beats to death in Inglorious Basterds needed money too.
THE ENTIRE AMERICAN ARMY COULDN'T BREAK THROUGH THE GERMANS' "BULGE" IN THE LINE FOR MONTHS, BUT 7-15 AMERICANS WITH TOMMY GUNS AND BRITISH RIFLES CAN DO IT IN ABOUT A WEEK BY TRAIN!?
Hollywood...
They don't care about *beep*