What would've happened if they'd NOT found exact match in DNA database?
It seems like the major evidence that got him freed was the lawyers finding an exact match in the DNA database in 2010 for the real killer, and then being able to place the killer as having lived in Round Rock, TX in 1986 at the time of the killing and then the killer actually having killed another woman a block down the street in 1988. But what if they had NOT found an exact match in the DNA database? Do you think Michael would still be in prison? Why or why not?
share