That is not an apt comparison. I already noted in my initial post that my comment applies to "any film that is not primarily the story of a musician." The Pianist is about a pianist and composer. The playing has to look realistic because it is a huge focus of the film. The best example of this type of authenticity that I've ever seen occurred in Control, a biopic of the late Ian Curtis. The four actors portraying the members of the band Joy Division learned to sing and play their instruments so well that they recorded the songs for the movie's soundtrack. The actors looked like they were playing because they actually were playing. But Lucille's piano playing in Crimson Peak is just not that important. It's a decorative footnote to the character, nothing more. There was no need to attempt to master Chopin just for that role. You should be pleased that the music was used, rather than staring at the actor's hands and finding fault with the simulation.
There's several scenes where Lucille is portrayed as playing the piano in this movie. The way they neglected to drill the actress into shape for that aspect of the role is indicative of its laid back attitude when it comes to overall quality of the finished picture as a whole. If it doesn't put in effort in all aspects that it can address, then the overall quality of the movie will suffer. This movie will never be in the same league as far superior pictures, such as Interview with the Vampire. That movie doesn't have a focus on piano that can be considered to be as huge as for instance "The Pianist", but it went the extra mile in all aspects of its production.
Another aspect where it shines far more than Crimson Peak is how subtle its special effects were. They put maximum effort into the making of their effects, and a lot of their painstaking effects isn't consciously noticed by most, but even so they result in an uneasy realism that resonates perfectly with the overall movie, which is exactly what they were going for. Of course, they had the best in the business working to make those effects happen. Watch the making of Interview with the Vampire and you might just be blown away by their attention to detail.
I'm not saying that aspects of Crimson Peak didn't have a high attention to detail, I mean the mansion looked amazing. I just wish they'd have put in equal effort in all other aspects of that movie, and perhaps it had been far more than the easily forgotten mediocrity that it is. If you don't care enough to make the decorative footnotes of your characters convincing, then how can we as an audience be expected to accept the characters as convincing and three dimensional?
And as for being pleased that the music was used, yes. I would say I am rather pleased. I'm also rather pleased that she failed so hard at it as she did, because if not, I'd have already moved on from this movie with a "meh". That was one genuine bad quality of the movie that gave me something to rant about, and because of it I'll always have a strong reaction to the movie Crimson Peak. And that's more than I can say for most mediocre movies that only fill me with a disgust at how mediocre they are and how they absolutely fail at catching my interest. Crimson Peak is at the higher end of mediocrity, because I sat through it and found it well worth the watch in spite of considering it a mediocrity simply because it had a bunch of subjective content that I happen to enjoy as a viewer. But past that, it had very little to offer. It's been a joy to bash this movie for its lack of attention in a place where it really mattered.
reply
share