Ending


I'm not even going to try to answer all questions that my interpretation brings up but given all the talking about hindsight and how nothing is as it seems I think that there is more to the pretty obvious endings that have been discussed here before. My version might not be fully conclusive yet but maybe we can expand the theory and plug the holes together. This is what I have come up with so far:

[Beware of spoilers!]

I think the Cop is responsible for pretty much every death aside from the flashbacks.

First observation: What kind of name is Jeter? It sounds like cheater and it is just one s short of Jester which does not only perfectly suit the theme of card games as a card that fits everywhere and nowhere but looking at the cover art it also describes a darkly twisted character with plenty of tricks up his sleeve.

Some things about this whole kidnapping made it feel way too set up. I was nearly convinced this was all meticulously staged so Jeter would seem like the one and only killer once this was over. He was kept for days but always healthy though we never saw him eat or drink, the time lapses due to the drugging seemed a bit too convenient, the camera felt so carefully placed as to not reveal something we should guess for ourselves, during his escapes Jeter always was kind of enabled by the supposedly oh so clever killer, then there were the tattoo, the photos and videos and some more things I don't remember just now.

The way the lines are delivered so heavy with meaning and also as the whole thing turns out as a story in a story in a story probably told many times before from hindsight made me think that the words in this movie were very dliberately chosen. So when the killer talks about a new apprentice I was always expecting someone to show up or reveal himself as said apprentice. I didn't believe this just to be a decoy to lure the detective out of the house. Since I couldn't think of any character we got introduced to that would fit being young, influenceable and a bit crazy from the get-go better than her I really much thought the girl (Amy) would turn out as the apprentice when Jeter goes to get her before fleeing the house or maybe afterwards so she can make sure he is going to jail for the kidnapping. Since none of this happened but there was still no apprentice revealed (though one might say the clown at the end might have been the apprentice) I didn't get rid entirely of the suspicion I had before about Amy. Thinking about it we first see her beating what she says was a peeping Tom with a murderous look while talking to her police daddy on the phone - not exactly how one imagines a sane person. Since she is never shown again after her testimony which actually freed Jeter despite evidence against him I thought maybe that was the whole point and she is his apprentice after all making sure he, the killer, gets away.

(Amy doesn't probably need to be the apprentice. There might be no apprentice after all or the clown might work as well as long as Jeter makes No-Apprentice-Amy believe there has been a man with a mask.)

And that's when I figured there might haver never been another murderer with a mask. It was always Jeter's alter ego. Since we barely get to know anything about his past it might as well have been him who had some miserable years right after high school/college at a *beep* job, then killed his wife when she cheated on him and educated himself in murdering. What better way to do so by joining the police force. He got his mentor, filled the container with bodies and then got there on purpose and not so much by chance to kill him and get promoted. After that he feels bad about what he has done to his mentor (maybe even to his other victims) and develops a split personality. (Though the split personality might have existed earlier.) He then elaborately stages the whole kidnapping for himself to realize again who he really is and to convince/brainwash Amy (wearing the mask probably) into joining him. Come to think of it the man in the mask keeps repeating how Jeter and him are not so different after all.

Now come the tricky parts:
Firstly the torture. As we well know from Fight Club beating oneself up is not a real issue, but tattoing oneself might well be. What is that tattoo for anyway? Glueing oneself to a wall might be even easier then doing it to another person and handcuffing is also easily done without help. Taking into account that Jeter is insane and has to be making up some things to be convincing only to himself maybe we don't even get to see the real truth here. Drugging might just be fading out when the other personality takes control, the handcuffs might have been open all along or are maybe even just a symbol for being chained and not free and so on. This gets reinforced by the poker stories wherin Jeter embodies the part of the detectives faithful to the advice: "If you can't think it you can't see it and i you can't see it you can't learn." In addition during the first story at the poker night the audience learns that it can't trust what it sees when the guys are making fun of the narrator and we see how it would have played out in the flashback.

The interaction with Lieutenant Calabrese (Ron Perlman) and Maxwell (Titus Welliver) during the kidnapping is even more difficult to explain and i din't crack that yet, just some thoughts:

Right at the start of the poker game Maxwell (Amy's father) said something very dubios to Jeter along the lines of: "If I had a say you wouldn't be getting this promotion. You knew my rules you broke my rules. If this goes wrong I will *beep* you up." This could well be related to Jeter having an affair with Maxwell's daughter and Maxwell blaming him for her disappearance but it would also fit to Maxwell being Jeter's mentor which would make the guy who was shot at the container full of bodies just a scapegoat (Maybe rabbit guy?) to further Jeter's promotion which Maxwell is not ok with him.
Lieutenant Calabrese was the only one who didn't tell a story. He spends his screentime in flashbacks rescueing Jeter, interrogating him and telling him he has potential. Is it coincidence that Jeter is (maybe not genuinely) handcuffed the moment he realizes that the masked murder might be able to escape handcuffs?
But there are parts where someone representing the interests of the killer interacts with those two police officers and since they would have recognized Jeter it could not have been him. So the now unmasked murderer is right: too many lose ends, he would have needed help (Amy's actual abduction as shown to us included). My guess is that this is where clown and rabbit step in. Everything that can't be explained by Jeter suffering from split personality or slight delusions is done by clown/rabbit.

In the end Jeter sets clown up to take the blame for the murders which doesn't make the murderer smarter than Jeter but makes now smug looking Jeter smarter than any senior police officer he is sitting at the table with, since he is the murderer himself.



Granted, some minor and major details don't fit in there yet but a twist ending like that seem to much better strike the general tone the movie sets, don't you think?




Oh and btw, I don't really have an explanation in any scenario for the masked murderer making "sex with girls" his number one priority and yet we never really see him going for that. Though it is alluded to three times (Amy might be too old for him, he and his friends stop and speak to a girld, the last victim is a girl). Also what about that tattoo?

reply

Very interesting explanation, thanks for sharing 

I was thinking it was the lead good guy who was the killer all along as well and what we saw of him being kidnapped was only what he told the cops, I could never go into such great detail as you tho with the clues and even Poker references so yeah excellent post

I was wondering about the beginning myself when he very quickly went in and found his girlfriend riding some other dude in their bed, what significance that had and when she was gonna appear in the story again but she never did...

Maybe that triggered him into becoming the killer he was? Cause the masked killer talked about how he once was a normal guy with a wife he loved just like him (that was around the parts where I started thinking he was the killer)

And her cheating turned his life upside down and made him snap, what do you think?

Oh and the last scene where he kills a guy with a gun glued to his hand, I think that mighta been a flashback from an old case or whatever and where he got the inspiration to glue the gun to his own hand to make it seem like he truly was the victim... Because what bad guy would glue a gun to their hand knowing the cops would have no other alternative but to shoot?

But it was a risk he was willing to take (hoping that they wouldn't go for a fatal shot) as that would make it easier for him if he was ever accused (which he was and charges dropped due to lack of evidence)

And HE was the apprentice of the guy we see as the kidnapper played by Michael Eklund (although he was never there because Amy's father had killed him), and the motive of it all was to avenge his mentor's death, maybe?

I don't think the clown or rabbit were real I think they were just some clever metaphor for something

It was FREE PIZZA! Free... *beep*... pizza!

reply

Very nice theory. I agree with it.

To complete it I think that the detective being the apprentice saw the opportunity of killing the master (the scene at the container). The mask guy said that he was ready to become the master and also it gave the detective (same person) a career boost (that story that he found it by luck didn't fly). It was the perfect Win-Win: promotion and getting rid of the master.

Now I have a question about something I just noticed:

When the father gets into the room and the detective starts shoothing him the girl immediately screams STOP IT! STOP IT!!! Like she knew the guy with the mask was her father. How can you explained this??? My theory: maybe the girl was the new apprentice but she didn't want the father to die?

I really enjoyed the movie...

reply

This is a little cover of a couple of posts, in no great detail.

Stan Jeter's reflection story of him capturing the man was a flashback of his "Solving" of the case. However in the voice over they state how some killers are just smarter, and the best thing to do is pretend they don't exist. Hence why he looked upset sitting in the chair as he reflected on taking the mask off and revealing the clown. (the eye makeup tells us this, and the duck tape and glue tells us he wasn't simply copying his mate).

Amy recognizes her father from his shoes. It is eluded to earlier, and by a panning of the camera to his feet as she makes the realization.

I also like the possible premise that Stan was the actual killer in a fight club styled twist. As mentioned they could have easily developed that, and possibly even did before a rewrite. Yet in the end I was pretty happy with the conclusion. Gave me a sense of conflicted closure.

reply

all your posts were too long. didn't read. so here's my problem with the ending:

Jeter kills the 'killer' with one shot and becomes captain. so he decides to erase the contrary evidence? like the superglue from the last guy's hand/gun and duct tape? otherwise, that would have easily determined he killed the wrong guy since it was the same evidence he himself was linked to. so that's what he learned from the poker night stories? if so, what a letdown. correct me if i'm wrong.

reply

No i think that's the lesson he learned as well, too pretend the serial killer doesn't exist because he's too smart to be caught. I see no other interpretation, and it fits with his characters back story of being a lucky cop rather than a good one.

I enjoyed the film but the ending soured me to it, i also have a problem with Ron perlmans character not double tapping that guy, there's no way he would have just shot that guy once, it would have been reflex to empty his gun into him once he began firing so i'm not buying it.

reply

I know this is 7 years late but the ending is actually more subtle than that and it took me three viewings to realize it. Jeter learned from Giancarlo Esposito's character's story to get inside the killer's head and also to pretend the smarter killers don't exist. When "James" tells Jeter why him he explains he was upset and sent into a catatonic depression because Jeter's actions caused Alby to get credit for James' crimes. At the end Jeter kills what he thinks is James but it turns out to be the Clown with the tattoos under his eyes.

The twist is that James probably expected Jeter to report his failure honestly to his superiors but instead Jeter used the opportunity to repeat the thing that depressed James last time- giving the clown the credit for James crimes. This will likely knock James out of commission and cause him to stop committing crimes unless he captures Jeter again. So Jeter has stopped James and all he has to do is watch his back and be ready for the time James comes back.

reply