Why so much swearing?

me

I believe it is a sign of a lack of intelligence when someone needs the constant use of expletives to articulate.

In that case you're doing intellectual snobbery at a high level

An authority on swearing in cinema/theatre/the declaration of impudence/poems/songs etc? Me? Hardly. That wasn't the point. Your apparent belief in your mastery of obfuscation is ill founded. What I've maintained throughout is that I know more about how much Australians swear than you do. The rest of it was just responding to your inanities.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Well unless you provide me with evidence showing that you're right then you are absolutely wrong.

In your opinion. We've already covered this.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Prove to me the swearing wasn't excessive.

Prove to me that it was.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Even though I already have explained this to you, my dimwitted friend, several times over, I don't need to prove anything to you. I voiced my OPINION and you are trying, and failing, to prove me wrong. All you've put forth so far is Awstrayleeuns swear a lot, and seeing as they are facing zombies the script didn't indulge in excessive use of swearing. Hardly a convincing argument but you are hellbent on winning an unwinnable argument, yet you continue and continue, (your NEED to be right, fueled by low self esteem 😀) This fact has flown clear over your head several times.
And you question why I call you a retard?
This is really quite amusing.
So once again, give me more belly laughs and attempt to prove to me the swearing wasn't excessive.

Just completing what you started. You were the first one to ask for proof of something that is clearly subjective.

Prove to me the swearing wasn't excessive.

Same can be said of you BTW. You're right because of your opinion.
You do realize that swearing to that extent is abnormal don't you?
It is indicative, amongst other things, of deep seeded anger issues. Even for Awwwstrayla it is abnormal.
Have you considered yourself to be abnormal? Maybe you are. It would appear that you are.

I thought I'd already covered normal, and what isn't. Normality is what you perceive it to be. But it's only YOUR normality. The rest of the world will quite happily trundle on being their version of normal. You claim to have traveled, but are unaware of this? Constantly diagnosing mental illnesses from forum posts? You really should spend less time watching Dr. Phil. It's not doing you any favours.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

First of all, no matter how you try to twist, turn and squirm, you can't convince anyone other than yourself that swearing every second or third word is normal. There are certain subject matter that are exempt from the subjectivity of what one perceives as normal and abnormal. A two headed calf, for instance, would be abnormal. Someone who reacts with disgust at seeing a mob beating up a child would be considered normal and someone who swears constantly would be deemed abnormal. As you can see (or maybe not seeing as it's you we're talking about) there are different levels and scenarios where this can apply. But it's not always a matter of subjectivity as you seem to think. Next you'll be telling the world why you think a two headed calf is normal.
I really am enjoying exposing you for the complete twit you are. I stopped trying to reason with you a while back, as it is quite impossible to reason with a retard (there's that word again!) and started baiting you every now and then for this reason.
Secondly, if you are such a proponent of subjectivity, why did you get such a bug up your ass about my opinion? Remember that? Aren't people allowed to have opinions? Are people only allowed opinions if they fall in line with your own? I mean, I did explain sufficiently how I formed this opinion and you are the only one on here who doesn't "get it". Sure, others may disagree with my view but they understood it is an opinion and everyone has a right to one. Oops, I forgot who I was talking to. Waste of time isn't it? Lol.
Moving along, yes, it's very easy to armchair diagnose someone with such glaring symptoms as yours. You have an abnormal (oops, I said "abnormal") need to be right, as I've said before, even though you are quite clearly wrong.
Lastly, please do reiterate how you aren't suffering from self esteem issues (again, you took my opinion way too personal for it to be anything else) when you're hanging around the computer awaiting my retorts, trying desperately to win an unwinnable argument?
Or is that normal also?

First of all, no matter how you try to twist, turn and squirm, you can't convince anyone other than yourself that swearing every second or third word is normal.

You have an abnormal (oops, I said "abnormal") need to be right, as I've said before, even though you are quite clearly wrong.

Or is that normal also?

Not even sure why you've brought them up.

I think your opinion is wrong. Big deal. You're the one who seems to be all defensive

Not even sure why you've brought them up.

You are clearly wrong, AGAIN, concerning your little philosophy on what is normal and how it can only be subjective.

The first one (2 headed calf) is a genetic anomaly (no doubt your family album contains pictures of more examples) and the second was in no way relevant to how much Australians swear when attacked by zombies, which was what the original post was about. Hence their lack of relevance

Normality is what you perceive it to be. But it's only YOUR normality. The rest of the world will quite happily trundle on being their version of normal

There are certain subject matter that are exempt from the subjectivity of what one perceives as normal and abnormal. A two headed calf, for instance, would be abnormal. Someone who reacts with disgust at seeing a mob beating up a child would be considered normal and someone who swears constantly would be deemed abnormal. As you can see (or maybe not seeing as it's you we're talking about) there are different levels and scenarios where this can apply. But it's not always a matter of subjectivity as you seem to think. Next you'll be telling the world why you think a two headed calf is normal.

If you were brought up in a household where you were strung up by your heels every night and flogged with an egg whisk, and you had no outside references, the first time you met somebody who didn't get strung up and flogged you'd think they were very odd. Your normality would be far different to theirs. You only have to read anything about any number of religious cults, where kids have been indoctrinated from birth, to realise that reality and normality are fleeting concepts. If you were born into a culture where child abuse was commonly practiced then you'd see nothing abnormal in it. Your normality would be completely different to other cultures. Normality is whatever creed the culture you live in lives by. If you think anything other than that you shouldn't be allowed out unsupervised.
Your reference to a 2 headed cow was just idiotic. A 2 headed cow would be abnormal because it's a genetic anomaly and would be unusual because of it's rarity. Human behavioural normality is whatever humans do in their own tribal groups.



If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Getting attacked by zombies isn't normal either, so I'm not sure if this point is actually valid.

I said

Getting attacked by zombies isn't normal either, so I'm not sure if this point is actually valid.

Did you forget what we were talking about? It was whether swearing to excess, in the real world, was abnormal.

What do zombies have to do with this?

You really are quite a confused specimen aren't you?

Actually it was if swearing to excess, in the real world, while being attacked by zombies, was normal.

You do realize that swearing to that extent is abnormal don't you?
It is indicative, among other things, of deep seeded anger issues. Even for Awwwstrayla it is abnormal.
Have you considered yourself to be abnormal? Maybe you are. It would appear that you are.

First post

Practically every 30 seconds somebody was dropping the F bomb or some other swear word. Annoying and pathetic!

As I clearly stated, my gripe was with the OVERUSE of foul language.

You do realize that swearing to that extent is abnormal don't you?
It is indicative, among other things, of deep seeded anger issues. Even for Awwwstrayla it is abnormal.
Have you considered yourself to be abnormal? Maybe you are. It would appear that you are.

Omg, you're just a full on retard aren't you?
What planet do you live on to think a post from almost a month back has any bearing on a new line of discussion (which was swearing in the real world, which was blatantly obvious). You clearly have quite an acute problem with reading and comprehension. Seriously, I challenge you to point out where I refer to the movie or zombies or the apocalypse. Forget about what was said a MONTH ago and concentrate, if that is at all possible, on the following statement and point out what I challenged you to.

You do realize that swearing to that extent is abnormal don't you?
It is indicative, among other things, of deep seeded anger issues. Even for Awwwstrayla it is abnormal.
Have you considered yourself to be abnormal? Maybe you are. It would appear that you are.

It is indicative, among other things, of deep seeded anger issues.

I stopped trying to reason with you a while back

I must have missed where you started.

I’ll give you this, you’re a whiz with a witty comeback.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Can't say I can give you anything.

Can't say I can give you anything.

Wow. Such wit!

Now you’re just copying me.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

LMFAO!!!!!!!!
Yep, that's what I'm doing.....
LOL!!!

Well you're certainly not presenting a cogent argument for your position.
"It's my opinion so I'm right and you're not" is all you've been saying.
"I've lived in Australia so I know more about their culture than you do, even though you grew up there" Is another of your failed gambits.
Throw in a few comments about how the proletariat are known for swearing more because they're stupid, confuse the issue by talking about 2 headed cows and then call anybody who disagrees with you names. Hardly debating society finals material are you?

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

"I've lived in Australia so I know more about their culture than you do, even though you grew up there"

Where the hell did I say, or even remotely suggest that I know more about Australian culture than you? Talk about grasping desperately for straws!

I lived there for a few years and although I accepted this for what it was, I still found it to be somewhat off putting. The language itself wasn't offensive, it was the way in which some people incorporated it into their verbal communication. "Just going to the f#@*ing pub", "we bought this f@#*ing dartboard the other day and I f#@*ing love it!". Now, "I f#!@ing love it", I have no problem at all with, I would probably express myself exactly the same way.

To answer your question concerning an apocalypse, zombie or otherwise, I would swear, sure. Maybe more than in everyday life, given the circumstances, but in context I wouldn't be swearing anymore than normal.
The characters in the movie were using F*%k as if it was necessary as opposed to using it as an adjective. I can't quote exact lines, I'd have to rewatch some of it but here's a general idea of what I'm talking about...... "I had to go to the f#*%ING store!", when "I had to rush to the store!", would be the preferable option for my mind, whether delivering it or listening to it from someone else. I don't know about you but I would always prefer the latter option regardless if it was an apocalypse or not.

Then you go on to say because Barry is a mechanic he will naturally swear like an a@&hole.
You sure do assume and stereotype a lot. You know what they say about assumptions right?

So I'm guilty of stereotyping Australian mechanics as being profanity producing machines based on me being Australian and knowing quite a few mechanics who all swear enough to make sailors embarrassed

It's my opinion so I'm right and you're not

Yes, unlike you, I am able to comprehend what I read. I get the concept of subjectivity. You just don't get it. You never will get it.
You even agreed with me after your ludicrous foray into another failed attempt at a witty(?) analogy. You accept that a two headed calf is abnormal (after declaring my example idiotic, what a hypocrite!) then agree that human behavior is deemed normal or abnormal by how one acts in their own tribal groups. So you still think swearing every 2nd or 3rd word is normal behavior in Western society?
You have just successfully argued against yourself. Well done champ! A new level of dumb for ya!

You say you get it,

I get the concept of subjectivity.

You accept that a two headed calf is abnormal (after declaring my example idiotic, what a hypocrite!) then agree that human behavior is deemed normal or abnormal by how one acts in their own tribal groups.

So you still think swearing every 2nd or 3rd word is normal behavior in Western society?

5 hours ago the discussion was still about a film.

Again, prove the swearing wasn't excessive.

I really am convinced you have some kind of brain malfunction, maybe head trauma, I don't know. You are just all kinds of messed up. Can't even comprehend simple statements.
You have tried manipulating my words, and failed, you have exposed yourself as a hypocrite and a liar. What's next? Will you now try saying you were just trolling all along seeing as you're being ridiculed so readily on here?
Wouldn't surprise me one bit!
I doubt you are employable. Nobody as thick as you are can hold down a job, surely!
You just keep outdoing yourself. LOL

It's worth me pointing out that there is nothing in that statement to show you changing gears re:- the discussion topic (well not so much a discussion, idiocy and obfuscation from your side and then me trying to make sense of your ramblings), which is the post I believe you're referring to about the topic being about real life. Undoubtedly you'll declare this to be wrong, and then choose to not enlighten me, as you've done throughout this.

You do realize that swearing to that extent is abnormal don't you?
It is indicative, among other things, of deep seeded anger issues. Even for Awwwstrayla it is abnormal.
Have you considered yourself to be abnormal? Maybe you are. It would appear that you are.

You're lying again. You posted

Undoubtedly you'll declare this to be wrong, and then choose to not enlighten me, as you've done throughout this.

Quite clear this was removed from any referral to the movie, or zombies, or an apocalypse. One clue is where I say
It is indicative, among other things, of deep seeded anger issues..

There are certain subject matter that are exempt from the subjectivity of what one perceives as normal and abnormal. A two headed calf, for instance, would be abnormal. Someone who reacts with disgust at seeing a mob beating up a child would be considered normal and someone who swears constantly would be deemed abnormal. As you can see (or maybe not seeing as it's you we're talking about) there are different levels and scenarios where this can apply. But it's not always a matter of subjectivity as you seem to think.

Did you forget what we were talking about? It was whether swearing to excess, in the real world, was abnormal. What do zombies have to do with this?

Funnily enough it's the Americans who generally have the most difficulties realising that the whole world isn't exactly the same as where they come from.

and then your own words deny that you get it.
So you still think swearing every 2nd or 3rd word is normal behavior in Western society?

There is no western society as a cohesive group. Americans, Australians and Brits share a common language but beyond that their cultures are all completely different.

This is a bit like having a discussion with a thesaurus. There's a lot of words going on, but not actually strung together in any sort of meaningful way.

It is indicative, among other things, of deep seeded anger issues

There are certain subject matter that are exempt from the subjectivity of what one perceives as normal and abnormal. A two headed calf, for instance, would be abnormal. Someone who reacts with disgust at seeing a mob beating up a child would be considered normal and someone who swears constantly would be deemed abnormal. As you can see (or maybe not seeing as it's you we're talking about) there are different levels and scenarios where this can apply. But it's not always a matter of subjectivity as you seem to think.

Did you forget what we were talking about? It was whether swearing to excess, in the real world, was abnormal. What do zombies have to do with this?

Funnily enough it's the Americans who generally have the most difficulties realising that the whole world isn't exactly the same as where they come from.

and then your own words deny that you get it.
So you still think swearing every 2nd or 3rd word is normal behavior in Western society?

There is no western society as a cohesive group. Americans, Australians and Brits share a common language but beyond that their cultures are all completely different.

Say what??? Our cultures are "completely different"?? So, we don't all celebrate Christmas, Easter, New Years at the same time? We don't celebrate the 21st birthday as a milestone? We don't generally have the same diet (you know, it's called the WESTERN diet)? We don't have similar drinking culture (being alcohol is acceptable in all 3 cultures)? Need I say more?? Sounds pretty similar to me!
Wait, you're not going to try to mix this up with zombies and the apocalypse are you?

I am done with you. You keep losing more and more credibility and I have no desire to keep this pointless debate up. Cannot argue with the mentally challenged after-all. You are one very misinformed, very stupid and very illogical being. You can have the last word. I'm sure you will think it means you won. Think what you like but you will always be a complete and utter twit as long as you stay as arrogant and ignorant as you currently are.

I have to interject here. I am an Australian and we absolutely do celebrate the 21st as a milestone, as do the UK! What you posted is complete hogwash. I wasn't even sure they celebrated this in the US like we did here.
Another thing, he was pointing out why the "commonalities" refute your claim our cultures are completely different. They are far more similar than different. Anyone can see this. He wasn't trying to prove they are exactly the same as you suggest. You seem to get confused over what someone is actually trying to point out to you.
Another thing is alcohol. I believe his point was that we deem it socially acceptable whereas in some middle eastern cultures, for example, frown upon its use with some countries actually outlawing it. It's typically viewed as more a Western past time rather than an eastern or middle eastern one.
I'm sorry but your views on American sitcoms are completely subjective and therefore hold no weight, as are your views on their beer. I for one don't mind American beer. They have been making it for a long time so it comes as no surprise they are fairly good at it by now. My personal favourite is Coors but I am partial to Bud also.
As for your claim concerning Americans not being aware that the rest of the world isn't exactly like America? Rubbish! I for one am not so obnoxious or dimwitted to entertain such a ridiculous idea. There are ignorant people the world over, but you seem to target Americans for some reason? It really sounds to me like you have issues concerning America and its citizens. Maybe you should take a trip there and see how nice they really are. Might change your attitude somewhat.
I'm sorry but you really do come across as quite ignorant here.

Most of it is subjective? Perhaps. US, British and Australian culture being the same? Not likely sweetheart. UK and Australian cultures have more similarities between them than the US. In Australia the 18th is the big milestone and the 21st is losing it's sting. Which is basically what I said. That might have needed a slight amendment. Alcohol is frowned upon by Middle Eastern cultures but it's celebrated virtually everywhere else and not just in the west, so it's not really a valid point.
US sitcoms is a very subjective point. If you like them, then good luck to you.
America is one of the most insular countries in the world, a large proportion of them are completely unaware of what happens outside their borders and when they do travel overseas they mostly expect that everyone will speak English and are surprised when they don't.
To be honest I gave up being rational with the original tool days ago. He was so wrapped up in how his opinion was the gospel truth I couldn't resist. The fact that I had a couple of days with not much to entertain me sealed the deal. Have you read some of his "arguments and proof"?
I'm biased against America? Read his opinions on Australia. See what you think. Not just in this thread.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Well I'm not going to go and read all these threads, I read some however and I did read his OP, I'll get to that in a minute, but I can see why he took issue with you. You're a bit of a pr!ck. Right off the bat you start with a smart-ass remark towards me by calling me sweetheart? No wonder you copped so much abuse, probably well deserved I'd say.
With saying that I am going to remain impartial here, snide remarks aside.
Apart from him seeming to attack all of Australia I see nothing wrong with his assertions. Myself and several family members and friends with whom the subject has popped up do think along the same lines that people who constantly insert swearing into their dialogue appear to be of below average intellect. Doesn't necessarily mean they ARE, but it does look like they might be.
As for the movie, yes, I agree with him again. While watching it I was thinking the same thing, just as another poster said, the F word stopped having any effect. Why did it lose effect? Excessive use obviously.
Remember this is all opinion. For you the swearing wasn't excessive nor do you deem people who constantly swear of below average intelligence and all this I respect. We are completely entitled to our opinions so attacking someone on a personal level because you disagree with them you have to expect retaliation and this was your mistake. I'm Australian myself and him taking a pot shot at Australia didn't affect me. Maybe you're too sensitive?
As for your claim the US, UK and Australia have "completely different" cultures, wow and no. Like I said earlier, we have much more in common than differences. I fail to see where you have provided anything to support your claim other than the assertion their sitcoms aren't enjoyed by anyone else but themselves (apart from Seinfeld of course). Hmmmmm.
I'm not looking to get into a long winded discussion here. I have said what I wanted to say and won't be responding.

I know a lot of people who swear like troopers, and are also very smart. This includes people with degrees and jobs that are commensurate with their education. The assertion that swearing is a sign of low intellect is just elitism of the worst kind. If you want to jump on that train as well then off you go. How you perceive people that swear is entirely up to you. The original point was this – Average Australians thrust into a horrific situation swearing a lot. Extremely high stress situation? I wonder why a sweary culture might become even more so when faced with a zombie holocaust? If you think differently then so be it. At least you’re not being a d@ckh$%d about it.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Oh and I never said our cultures were the same. I said they were similar. Learn to read. I really hate when people try to twist other people's words. It's weak and underhanded.

You're not a friend of his are you?

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Add paranoia to your shortcomings. Bye Bye.

You're not a friend of his are you?

Add paranoia to your shortcomings. Bye Bye.

No no no no no. I asked you to point out where I said I know more about Australian culture than someone born there. Don't f*%king try to manipulate sh*t again you coward! Man up to your bullsh*t. You lied and I pulled you up on it and now you're trying to weasel your way out of it once again by a lame attempt at misdirection. Stop trying to evade the mess you've made for yourself, stop talking in complete circles and answer a direct question with a direct answer you damn coward!

Then you go on to say because Barry is a mechanic he will naturally swear like an a@&hole.
You sure do assume and stereotype a lot. You know what they say about assumptions right?

Lala land? It must be Lala land because I don't drink.
Oh wait, there's also this.

Explain to me why it wasn't excessive again? Oh that's right because Barry is an Australian mechanic and will say f this and f that and f off, because it's OK to stereotype and make assumptions. There is no way you are right on this because it is obvious the script was lacking any meaningful dialogue so they fill it with swearing which brings us to why I posted in the first place.

You are reading it correct, retard, but your comprehension is all messed up, as it has been throughout. Where do I say I know more about your culture than you do? How is it even possible for someone to be so far off target? It's like you are having some kind of stroke or something. How about reading the whole sentence through? You once again either completely miss the point or are trying, again, to manipulate my words into different meaning. What was said was this,

"There is no way you are right on this because it is obvious the script was lacking any meaningful dialogue so they fill it with swearing which brings us to why I posted in the first place."

Yet again, you come up empty. You tried to lie and get away with it but were pwned and aren't even man enough to face up and admit it. As I said, you're nothing but a weak, lying little coward.

Yep, either a schoolkid or a Matthew McConaughey wannabe (check Failure to launch, an agreeable lack of Australian swearing in it) who still lives in your parents basement.

but were pwned

Wow, you determined all that from one word?
Oh that's right, you are kind of big on assumptions aren't you?

Wow, you determined all that from one word?

You didn't do well at school (or should that be aren't doing well at school) because you'd realise that it's very difficult to prove a negative.

Until there is definitive proof that most people who need to swear to articulate are not idiots then how can my opinion be wrong?

I know I said I wasn't going to respond, but curiosity got the better of me one night so I started reading more of your exchanges and I couldn't resist. Scallywag kept arguing you into a corner and you kept digging yourself deeper and deeper into stupidity and desperation. In fact most of your retorts were nothing more than evasive nonsense in the face of his logic. Several of your responses I couldn't make head nor tail of. Instead of responding direct questions with direct answers you started twisting words and subject material completely out of context, as you tried doing with me (remember this?

US, British and Australian culture being the same? Not likely sweetheart.

Either you and Scallywag_13 are best friends or the same person with 2 profiles. Your posting history and the way you write things is so similar it can't be a coincidence. Either way, welcome back.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

I really wished you would have continued making goanna_38 look like a moron. I don't think I've seen anything quite like the nonsense coming out of that idiot! I would have gave up on that caper way before you did however. Can't stand trying to reason with an unreasonable immature twit like his kind. I just don't have the patience. You did well.
Kudos!

Twit and moron seem to be a popular words with you and your "best friend". Coincidence? I think not.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

[deleted]

Twit and moron seem to be a popular words with you and your "best friend". Coincidence? I think not.

Not a coincidence at all, considering the subject matter

Nah, you're not delusional at all.....

Delusional?
Let's examine the evidence shall we?
I spent several days arguing with Scallywag_13 (the 13 is obviously his age) because he seemed to hold some sort of elitist opinion on profanity and the use of it by people, and because he also seemed to paint himself as an authority on how much Australians would swear while being attacked by zombies. After several days he realised he couldn't win so he bailed. A day or two later a white knight rides into view in the form of jellyblabber (I think I spelled that correctly) who penned a post that seemed to be written by a fully formed adult, and followed it up with another. Then the wheels fell off and the debating style became the same as that used by Scallywag_13, namely stick your tongue out while saying
"Nyah Nyah, I know I am but what are you"
The posting history and style of both of you (all 1 of you) is so similar that it's almost completely improbable that you're 2 people. I detailed most of this in a previous post. You and he both seem to like calling people twits and morons (I don't think you've called me a retard yet, but that's undoubtedly only a matter of time).
You both seem to be some sort of armchair psychologist, tutored at the university of Dr. Phil.
You claim to be an Australian but the one review you posted, on the Plague board, was by - jerryslabber from United States, which means you're either an ex-pat or a fibber. The fact that you've posted in a way to indicate that you're in Australia lends credence to the fibber theory.

To be honest the main reason I'm still bothering to post at all is because I used to be married to somebody like you, somebody who refuses to let the other party have the last word (your return after a couple of days is evidence of that), and I developed the habit of continuing an argument well past the logical point of null return just to see how far they'd take it.
I have no doubt this will finish eventually when one of us dies, and because I actually finished school a few years ago it will almost certainly be me first, but only after 575,982 posts back and forth. Your output will probably drop once you graduate from high school and start pulling double shifts at McDonalds to try and save up enough money to move out of your parents house, but once you're living away from home you'll be able to post nonsense to your hearts content again. Then you just have to outlive me.
Oh, and also because I'm a bit of a pr!ck apparently.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

On a movie review of Plague jerryslabber wrote this

I watched this movie based on the rating and because I like a decent post apocalyptic film.

You can determine this by their IMDb ID's! Same names as the directors! LOL LOL! I don't know which is dumber, these friends and relatives with their obvious false reviews, or the script and direction of this cliché ridden boring mess! Only reason to watch this film would be to later come back here afterwards and read these reviews. Hilarious!

Well, I watched Plague also. I went on ratings alone from this site, didn't read the reviews, was on netflix so what the hell. Anyway, that too is an Australian film, and that also has shameless and very dumb, I might add, (some of the "reviews" are written by handles with the same last name as one of the directors) reviews. Very clearly an undeserved rating. You don't even have to watch the movie, just read the reviews, it's quite funny how clueless these people are.

Because twit is such a highly unusual adjective used to describe someone who is stupid or foolish? That aside, in both examples you gave not once did either of us use the word twit.

I see you have your shovel out already digging yourself another hole.

And I'm supposedly the one with the comprehension issues?
Twit wasn't a highly unusual adjective........ in the 19th century. It's fallen out of favour a bit in the last 100 years.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Twit wasn't a highly unusual adjective........ in the 19th century. It's fallen out of favour a bit in the last 100 years.

You're also equally inept at witty retorts.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Twit wasn't a highly unusual adjective........ in the 19th century.

And fell out of favour in the 1930's.



If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

So?

So?

And your point is?

And your point is?

You have to be the same person.

You're also apparently both big fans of Dr. Phil given the armchair diagnosing going on. I'll believe you're two seperate people when I see you both in the same room.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

I'll believe you're two seperate people when I see you both in the same room.

given the armchair diagnosing going on.

and you're also both complete tools.

Oh no, you called me a twit again. I can handle that. Just as long as you don't start calling me a berk, duffer, or git. That would be really hurtful.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

No matter how much you bluster and harrumph, this isn't going as well as you'd imagined is it?
If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Bluster, now there's the pot calling the kettle black!
Anyway, I had no expectations other than you would make yourself look desperate and idiotic. Was a tad boring being as predictable as you are but as it turns out, it couldn't have gone better.

this isn't going as well as you'd imagined is it?

Yep. He's a man after my own heart alright!

I assume this is in reference to Dr. Phil

Yep. He's a man after my own heart alright!

Who's bald? And what school?
You sound a bit angry over there.

Who's bald? And what school?
You sound a bit angry over there.

You still sound angry

You still sound angry

Wow. So angry over so little.
Issues.........

Wow. So angry over so little
Issues.......

Lol @ trying to save face!
Scramble some more. Your insecurities are showing.

(not going quite like you imagined is it?)

Lol @ trying to save face!
Scramble some more. Your insecurities are showing.

(not going quite like you imagined is it?)

Dr Phil says you're a bona-fide dickhead.

Dr Phil says you're a bona-fide dickhead.

You're stating I am two different people but you don't have issues?
Classic!
Are you wearing a tinfoil hat right now?

You're stating I am two different people but you don't have issues?
Classic!

Are you wearing a tinfoil hat right now?

You're getting a bit slack. I made a posting on page 12 about 4 hours ago and it hasn't had a senseless dribble reply. I'm a bit disappointed.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Great minds think alike.

Great minds think alike.

That's a big assumption on your part.

And that would be an assumption on your part.

seemed to paint himself as an authority on how much Australians would swear while being attacked by zombies.

After several days he realised he couldn't win so he bailed.

The posting history and style of both of you (all 1 of you) is so similar that it's almost completely improbable that you're 2 people.

I'm out of here

You have it all worked out don't you? Only possible explanation is what your insecure personality coupled with that paranoid and obsessed brain of yours comes up with.
There's a completely sensible and legitimate reason why my account was from the US. But don't bother asking will you? Go head first in and jump off the deep end declaring I am "fibbing", but not only fibbing, I have gone and created another account!
Do you ever read yourself without those rose coloured glasses on?
Probably for the best you don't. If you could read yourself objectively you would likely order the straitjacket yourself.

How did you know my reading glasses are rose coloured? I need them to read, without them everything is a blur.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Wouldn't expect anything less from you, evading everything as usual.

evading everything as usual

What? You've never heard of looking at something through "rose coloured glasses"? OK, I'll explain. It means you are biased, completely subjective, eg "she only saw her son through rose coloured glasses as he went unpunished although he was clearly at fault".
Hardly nonsense in the context of the discussion.

It means you are biased, completely subjective, eg "she only saw her son through rose coloured glasses as he went unpunished although he was clearly at fault".

To be honest the main reason I'm still bothering to post at all is because I used to be married to somebody like you, somebody who refuses to let the other party have the last word (your return after a couple of days is evidence of that), and I developed the habit of continuing an argument well past the logical point of null return just to see how far they'd take it.

Back to Dr. Phil mode.

If there ever was a spouse

I developed the habit of continuing an argument well past the logical point of null return just to see how far they'd take it.

before I realised it is pointless

Can't stand trying to reason with an unreasonable immature twit like his kind. I just don't have the patience.

Who cares that I said "bye bye", that has absolutely no bearing on my assertion of you using that cop out of a statement as licence to act like an ars*hole.
You keep trying to deflect. You can't man up and directly debate the argument I present to. You're all over the show.

If the argument is pointless then just walk away. All you're doing is enabling me. :-)

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Enabling? Probably, but I'm having fun watching how you try to weasel your way around everything.

Enabling? Probably, but I'm having fun watching how you try to weasel your way around everything.

I've eschewed

witty rejoinder

you somehow construe

mustachioed

Crappola? You mean crapola I assume?
At least you never called me a retard. Because that's really hurtful.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Who talks like this?

You type this...

Sorry, I forgot that you have comprehension issues,

I might had trouble with potty training.

I left a word out of a post and you got the tense wrong in your reply (typed, not type). That's 1 all, and not really that embarassing.


If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Actually, type or typed would be acceptable.
Keeping score? Grow up.

Keeping score? Grow up.

Another cop out.
The reason I jumped on you missing that word? Because you jump on typos. TYPOS, the weak man's arsenal when going into the online debating battlefield!
The first 2 or 3 times I didn't bother. I decided after several "typo" attacks, however, I'd give you a taste of your own medicine and lo and behold, you didn't like it one bit!

The first 2 or 3 times

I wonder how long you had to scroll for.
Sorry about that 😀

I have plenty of time.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?

Yes well I got caught up in the *beep* before I realised it is pointless. I also haven't encountered anything like this before, that's for sure. How someone can be so far off the mark, have their head so far up their own a**hole is quite astounding.
Anyhow, I'm glad somebody else saw this idiot for what he (or she) is.

Welcome back Scallywag_13. I missed you.

If you called a Centaur a horses arse, would he be offended?