You know he didn't direct it right?
Scahill wanted to make a film about the issues, the directed wanted to make a film about an investigation.
The voice over and putting Scahill at the centre of the film were not his idea.
But when a film is about an investigation, you sort of need the person doing the investigation at the centre, especially when the content of the film is less talking heads and observation, and more about getting a point across.
It seemed to me that they didn't have the observation footage or talking heads to tell the story, so had to rely on the narrative of Scahills investigation itself, and how he tells the story.
How would you do that without putting him in the film?
The problem is that while it is an interesting expose, the story is a bit thin, the content a bit lacking and feels more like a newspaper article than a film. It should almost have been made 10 years from now with a conclusive ending, although the fact there is no real ending, like the war itself, is fitting.
reply
share