I'm strangely impressed that you've had the awareness to delete your post, but do you mind explaining just what you think you're playing at saying things like the following:
Cosmopolitanhobo likes 12 year old girls.
Is there context to this? I mean I know Kurt is the type to throw insults and all that, hell he legit tried to say that I'm somehow a homosexual because I made one post on the "Sausage Party" board, when in context it was me laughing at a SJW review because they offended Hispanics with their review. Like he tried to find something incriminating about me and saw in my posting history and picked the first thing that sounded funny.
shareKurt enjoys bashing Kristen Stewart's appearance and acting ability on the Stewart boards, leading with 'she looks like a 12 year old'. As Cosmo called him out on it, Kurt's claiming he's now attracted to 12 year olds.
shareWell I guess Kurt and I have something in common, I'm not a fan of her acting nor do I find her attractive. But that's kind of sad that Kurt has to really stoop down that low to call other people pedo's like that. Like if her actual age was 12 year old then I believe he would be justified in calling other pedo's (though it's not something I will ever do). Though I do find it hypocritical of him posting negative things about Kristen Stewart on her board and then complain about that to atheists on this board for doing the same crap he's doing.
shareThough I do find it hypocritical of him posting negative things about Kristen Stewart on her board and then complain about that to atheists on this board for doing the same crap he's doing.
on the Stewart boards
As Cosmo called him out on it, Kurt's claiming he's now attracted to 12 year olds.
Cosmo stated the exact same defense as the Kristen Stewart groupies
Did they also tell you that you're wrong in stating that some women don't look like 'real women',
hell he legit tried to say that I'm somehow a homosexual
He'd deleted the post when I went to click on reply, so he clearly knows he's done wrong not that you'd guess so given his replies to deviates about it
[deleted]
Anyway, well Cosmo...you defended the perverts that openly stated they're in love with Stewart
And you regularly salivate over Kate Beckinsale on these boards, what's your point?
No. I made a list of women who actually look like women
Kurt - Now the self appointed judge of women's appearance, true Christians and Militant Atheists. Impressive pomposity, even for you.
You're the self appointed judge of people of faith.
I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not
I think you're an @ss, sure, but I never judged whether you are a person of faith or not.
shareLiar
"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates
When did I accuse you of not believing? I'll help - never. I'd completely understand other believers wanting disown you based on your recent behaviour, however.
shareother believers wanting disown you
Cosmo...you defended the perverts that openly stated they're in love with Stewart
maybe you have a thing for under aged girls and don't realize it?
I've called you out
you do too with Kate Beckinsale.
And she's 26 you dozy tosspot.
Just another daily mood swing for you, nancy.
If you really want to get into Kurt's head
She looks underdeveloped and suspected of having an eating disorder. Then she screwed the producer for Snow White....which was weird.
And a homophobic slur as well.
Psychologists aside I don't think anyone with any sort of moral code wants to get into your head.
Still NOT obsessed with her sex life I see, you strange man.
If I say that you act like a little girl, that's not a homophobic slur.
Why the stalking?
And now you want to bring the Stewart argument to the GND board, which is really weird.
If you have no interest in Stewart, then why are you bringing this issue to this unrelated board?
And it wouldn't be the first time you've made homophobic slurs, like the 'liberal' you think
My point has never been specifically about Stewart
why are you so immoral?
It doesn't matter to me if you're gay.
go to her board if you feel this strongly about her.
Why would you care?
"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates
So you're still making homophobic slurs then, and not just to me either.
That makes more sense, genuinely thought he may have realised how he'd gone completely wrong for a moment there, but his replies since have certainly backed this up.
shareWhat he did was pretty messed up, but I personally think that if you really wanted an apology from him, it's probably not best to tell him to go *beep* himself. It will only give him more of an incentive not to apologize back.
shareKaito has a little trouble with the sorting out of reality.
1) Kaito did you notice that GND board isn't the Kristen Stewart board? Can you tell me why Cosmo wanted to bring the multi-member debate from the Stewart board to the GND board?
You wanted to get involved and chime in, remember?
2) Are you aware that four Kristen Stewart fans on the Stewart board announced they wanted to have sex with Stewart and date her? As to why Cosmo wanted to bring that topic to the GND board remains a mystery as well.
3) Kaito would you like to know the other boards Cosmo follows me to? For a guy that hates me, doesn't value my comments, and disagrees with everything I say, wants to kick me off IMDb, but follows me to multiple boards: he makes no sense.
Kaito would you like to know the other boards Cosmo follows me to?
Cosmo goes to every board that I go to. He's commented on the content of multiple boards and exposed himself.
"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates
That's not a list kurt. Do you not know what a list is?
Do you not think it a touch odd that every time you're asked to provide some sort of evidence of your allegations you're found wanting? I do.
*edit*
Also, what comments on which multiple board have I made? And try not to avoid providing an actual response. Also also, remember that every time you tell a lie the baby Jesus cries.
Kaito has a little trouble with the sorting out of reality.
1) Kaito did you notice that GND board isn't the Kristen Stewart board? Can you tell me why Cosmo wanted to bring the multi-member debate from the Stewart board to the GND board?
You wanted to get involved and chime in, remember?
2) Are you aware that four Kristen Stewart fans on the Stewart board announced they wanted to have sex with Stewart and date her? As to why Cosmo wanted to bring that topic to the GND board remains a mystery as well.
3) Kaito would you like to know the other boards Cosmo follows me to? For a guy that hates me, doesn't value my comments, and disagrees with everything I say, wants to kick me off IMDb, but follows me to multiple boards: he makes no sense.Well you attempted to follow me by trying to say that I was gay because I made 1 post on the sausage party movie board. Hence if you looked at my post with context, you would've saw that I was responding to a SJW review of the movie. The SJW review was trying to show how the movie was offensive to hispanics and yet she got flack from hispanics because in her review she said something offensive about hispanics and bisexuals. All I typed down was "lol" in response to it because of how ironic it was.
From what I got from Cosmo post, he did that to expose your hypocrisy. You go on the Kristen Stewart board to post negative things about her and yet you get all butthurt the moment atheists post anything negative on this board. I don't think he would have much of a problem with you trolling that board if you didn't complain about atheists doing the same thing here.
If they do, so what?
Let them fantasize all they want
The internet is home for creepy ass fetishes,
1 post on the sausage party movie
Anyways I fail to see how it was warrant to call him a pedo
him bringing this up was to expose you of your hypocrisy.
And that's what I asked your buddy cosmo.
Why is he worried about what I say on another board?
The rest was his interpretation of offensiveness.
(capitals please kurt)
Why are you so concerned about what others say to us.
"Cosmopolitanhobo likes 12 year old girls."? And don't avoid the question like you normally do.
Correct the thread title first and I'll think about it.
This isn't the Kristen stewart board, cosmo.
there's a question mark at the end of the sentence.
why have you watched so many teen movies, cosmo?
I won't correct the whole lot, but there, I've added '-2000' to it. How's that?
Seriously, is your whole issue that the thread title just says 'kurt' rather than 'kurt-2000'? Everyone knows who it's about so it's really not that much of an issue.
shareYou didn't answer the question. The Kristen Stewart message board is entirely different from the GND board. Cosmo went to the Kristen Stewart to follow me. He didn't have the balls to comment on the KS board, and he brought his issues here so you could empathize with his butthurt. And your last sentence in that paragraph made no sense. What does the KS board have to do with atheists?
And that's what I asked your buddy cosmo. So what? Why is he worried about what I say on another board? It makes no sense.
All the points about Stewart belong on her board. Why is this complicated for you?
That has to be the gayest title in film history. But you stepped in it.
I stated that his argument was identical to the argument made by the pedos.
So you're admitting that cosmo had to bring the Stewart board discussion to this board, because you and deviates are his support group to protect him?
Why do you troll the Kristen Stewart board by posting negative stuff about her
you get mad anytime an atheist or a christian post anything negative about this movie on this board?
why you care so much about other people's fetishes online?
If they find her attractive, so what?
with even a quick google search you would realize it has nothing to do with anything gay at all. But being homophobic
I might even agree with you if you can explain yourself well.
Sounds like your mad because you can't find people agreeing with you here.
Kurt if you want people to side with you
Why do you troll this board posting negative stuff about me?
I don't get mad at you for posting negative stuff. I think you're pathetic, but I don't get mad at you.
Because these creeps follow me from board to board?
Why are you here again?
I thought you hated this board and me?
And if I don't...so what? What's it to you regarding my conversations on various boards you don't participate in for actresses you couldn't care less about?
I'm well aware of the film, sausage party boy.
No. I just found it creepy that some creeps here followed me to another board and refused to comment on that board, then for some strange reason they want to rant about an unrelated discussion on this board
When did i say that I want people to side with me?
Five atheists against Kurt is pretty much par for the course on this board, isn't it? lol
Why are you avoiding my question?
Yeah right, you're probably fuming inside right now reading comments right now exposing you of the hypocrite you are.
You need to work on your grammar.
Do you suffer from Alzheimers or what?
I find you equally as pathetic though.
Yet you created multiple topics about other movies and actors/actresses on this board that have nothing to do with GnD like The Accountant and Battlestar Gallatica.
Your persecution complex says otherwise.
Which one of your questions?
You really have no life of your own?
LOL My grammar is better than yours
Would you like to be my mom?
When asked why you're here you stated, because Kurt insults people. LOL
But you keep tabs on me daily and beg for my replies.
See how you convey the wrong impression, and then I end up saying the wrong thing. LOL
You wanted to discuss sausage party. lol
Did you need a hug before I go?
Literally nothing makes me happier than angry straight people
image for user Kaito_Kars
by Kaito_Kars » 20 hours ago (Tue Dec 20 2016 13:54:14) Flag ▼ | Reply |
"I never got the impression they're gay. I mean they act the same way normal guys would act towards one another. If they're suppose to be gay based off from their actions, then I guess a bunch of guys in real life are actually gay as well."
They act the same way as normal guys?! Kaito!!!! WTF
Look: Side bar issue...I confess that I have no problems with people wanting to be gay> I sometimes have a poor sense of appropriateness when I make tasteless jokes about cosmo being a little...different. Which is not nice.
But it appears that you're not in a position to lecture on homophobic behavior, Kaito?
Why do you troll the Kristen Stewart boards when you don't think she's a good actress or good looking?He protests there because he's a militant anti-Kristen. That's just what militant anti-Kristens do. share
He protests there because he's a militant anti-Kristen. That's just what militant anti-Kristens do.
LOL
shareWhy do you troll the Kristen Stewart boards when you don't think she's a good actress or good looking?
I don't post on the IMDB boards that often.
You on the other hand seem to post on it like every single day. Like you have no life outside of the IMDB boards.
Coming from a guy who can't tell the difference between a statement and a question.
Would you like to be my mom?
You wish.
Lying and making *beep* up as usual Kurt. But honestly, I bet you can't even find one posts that even suggests this. My challenge to you, but you don't have to do it because I know you won't find it.
And you're calling me gay when you want a hug from me? LOL
I swear, you have a reading comprehension of a third grader if you can't tell that post was suppose to be sarcastic. Like you have to be on purpose misinterpreting the post or you're just not that smart to begin with.
I wouldn't be surprise if you're in the closet.
Unlike you I have a life outside the internet.
They liked this movie as well as make gay jokes
In reference to the discussion above: ^ ^
"I never got the impression they're gay. I mean they act the same way normal guys would act towards one another. If they're suppose to be gay based off from their actions, then I guess a bunch of guys in real life are actually gay as well." - Kaito
We'll revisit your Star Wars "sarcastic" gay homophobic joke in the future.
Once again, I initially went to the KS board to discuss the downside of the Twilight films, which was Stewart being the problem. The discussion evolved just like it does on other boards.
talking to me
I never begged for you to post at all.
If I didn't already have a mother, you would not be my first pick.
Why are you on this board at all, ranting about me if you claim to have better things to do?
You're acting like a jackass and picking a fight. Intentionally.
I really don't.
You already got the hug,
This is what you said, and the intent wasn't sarcasm, liar. I was going to be nice, but I can see we'll have to revisit this comment.
I have nothing against gays.
Apparently you don't outside of Rouge One, if you're on this board nagging at me.
I have no idea why the Kristen Stewart board discussions are of interest to you when you've never commented there. Just as strange as cosmo.
They don't make gay jokes
but you should realize that the comment you made on Rouge One Star Wars: "I mean they act the same way normal guys", - you're now claiming was a sarcastic joke. So apparently you do make jokes about gays? Or would you like to change your story again.
Meaning you went on that board for the sole purpose to post negative criticism about Kristen Stewart.
Meaning you're doing the exact same thing that you complained about to atheists or other people who disliked this movie on this board. Meaning you're a hypocrite.
You're the one who responded to me first,
I don't think anyone ever begged for you to post as well.
I bet your mother must be ashamed of her own son spending everyday on this board *beep* posting.
you're the jackass who started the fight the moment you wrongfully started calling other users a pedo.
Like I said, you're the one calling me gay when you're the one who wanted a hug. I never asked for it.
That's like the Donald Trump equivalent to "I don't hate Mexicans, I eat Mexican food!"
While you've been on the IMDB boards posting every single day.
You should see a doctor because you have memory loss issues or something.
I already explained why Cosmo brought it up, it was to expose you and your hypocrisy.
Oh yes they do: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/01/westboro-baptist-church-april-fools-joke-funny_n_2993863.html
showing the Topic Creator how the 2 characters in Rogue One were not gay because they interact with each other like normal guys.
Meaning: I went on another board to have a discussion that you weren't a part of. And since you don't care in the first place, and admitted that, you can explain why you're ranting about it now.
I keep my comments on the GND board when discussing GND topics.
Should I copy and post the date you came back to this board to talk about kurt? Done telling lies today?
It's not my fault you're unhappy.
Ever keep track of how often you post here?
Your comment history reveals that hypocrite.
Sounds like bromance to me.
You're acting like you need a hug.
In your own words: You made a sarcastic joke about gays, and it was nasty. Or do you now confess that you were being serious? Which is it?
I'm not acting like "normal guys"?
if you pay for the visitation charges
mother Kaito.
Ironic that you know all about Westboro gay jokes.
You did it again. LOL
Meaning: You do the exact same thing you accused of atheists doing on this board. Which once again makes you a hypocrite.
Caught you in another lie again:
Actually I'm very happy, unlike you that the only sense of happiness you can find is trolling a movie board.
Yeah, and I notice that there seems to be breaks in how often I post here. You on the other hand seem to post on the IMDB boards like every day.
butthurt that you can't find people here agreeing with you
Sarcastic post =/= sarcastic joke. Like even someone illiterate would know the difference.
I feel sorry for your wife the most...you can't make enough money to support your family... going out into the real world and getting a job.
but also a creep as well.
So you admit that you and the Westboro Baptist Church has a lot of things in common.
Yeah I know, it's a bit tiring that I have to repeat myself to a person who has reading comprehension that of a third grader.
I didn't bring a conversation from another board into this board. You're first lie bombed.
LOL You mean asking people's opinions about a film like BSG? That's nothing like bringing the KS argument into this board. You're second lie bombed.
You're trolling this board right now.
You post here every chance you get, hypocrite. LOL
If I was looking for people to agree with me, I wouldn't post an a atheist infested board. Again you're busted being irrational.
Then stop trying to mother me, and you won't have that problem any more, lol
Actually it wasn't sarcastic at all. You were being serious about gays not being normal. lol
That's sad to witness.
your emotional meltdown comment. Don't blame me for your tantrum here.
go back to the Star Wars board where I notice people are ignoring you there as well. lol
I didn't bring a conversation from another board into this board. You're (sic) first lie bombed.
If I was looking for people to agree with me, I wouldn't post an a atheist infested board
Yeah I know, I figured that much. He probably only likes Lena because she's also very confrontational as well, even though hilariously they both disagree on a lot of things. But I guess their common ground is that they both hate atheists and "non-true Christians" lol.
shareI don't think he would have much of a problem with you trolling that board if you didn't complain about atheists doing the same thing here.
Spot on. I've been saying all along that he has no sense of self awareness, turns out he also can't understand these things when they're plainly spelt out to him.
he has no sense of self awareness
No, you said that before on multiple occasions as well.
You're just here to harass and ridicule.
"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates
Poor Kurt and his persecution complex.
sharePoor Kurt and his persecution complex.
I merely responded to Cosmo, then you butted in. Your posts pop up on my e-mail feed.
shareby Kaito_Kars » 4 days ago (Sat Dec 17 2016 19:10:44) Flag ▼ | Reply |
"Is there context to this? I mean I know Kurt..."
This is you, claiming 4 days ago to know me, having a desire to talk about me, but now claiming you just wanted to talk about me behind my back.
Are you now officially for record stating that you don't want to talk directly to me, but instead simply want to talk about me with your buddies? I can certainly put you on ignore if that's what you're requesting. Either yes, or 'I don't care' will mean the same thing.
Your posts pop up on my e-mail feed.
This is you, claiming 4 days ago to know me, having a desire to talk about me, but now claiming you just wanted to talk about me behind my back.
Are you now officially for record stating that you don't want to talk directly to me, but instead simply want to talk about me with your buddies? I can certainly put you on ignore if that's what you're requesting. Either yes, or 'I don't care' will mean the same thing.
Your brain pollution shows up on boards I'm trying to have a conversation in.
Fine, I don't have a problem at all.
YAY!
shareYou're on ignore
He was upset that my replies were ending up in his email. I asked him if he wanted me to ignore his comments and stop commenting, and he cheerfully said yes. If he changes his mind I'll reverse it.
Merry Christmas Cosmo.
He was upset that my replies were ending up in his email.
I asked him if he wanted me to ignore his comments and stop commenting, and he cheerfully said yes.
If he changes his mind I'll reverse it.
Merry Christmas
He was upset that my replies were ending up in his email.
Merry Christmas Cosmo.
Even I might not be able to get the Kurt post formula down.
shareGo fùck yourself and offer me an apology
Oh for the love of Flying Spaghetti Monster, this is Kurt. I've never met Kurt, but let me tell you my impression of Kurt from a couple years or so of seeing him post on the GND boards. (All of this is my best guess of the guy, not based on any special knowledge. So all of this may be based on a faux-Kurt internet persona, but I tend to take people at face value on the 'net, until evidence indicates otherwise.)
Kurt is not the most knowledgeable or smartest guy in the world but he's not dumb. Far from it. He doesn't know the Bible or Christianity real well, but he has a pretty good amount of general knowledge. He is sympathetic to Christians and feels protective of them. He actually has a sense of right and wrong in terms of wanting to cause trouble for people who attack believers (some of which can be pretty rude, you have to admit) or for others who go against some code to which he subscribes. At least as far as the internet goes he's less concerned with how he behaves than with the impact on those who are affected by his behavior. (And probably he gets some satisfaction just from fighting with people, though I doubt he does from fighting the "good" people.)
So when it comes to GND boards there are some "bad guys" who are to be discomforted and fought with, without much regard to tactics. You my friend are one such person. He'll start a thread with inflammatory material, just to cause discomfort and provoke a response. He'll deliberately distort what a "bad" person says, in order to cause discomfort and provoke a response. Kurt will appear to misunderstand (or "forget") what the "bad" people write, or miss the point, and that's probably deliberate too. Truth and fairness and the norms of reasoned debate have nothing whatsoever to do with this behavior. If it causes discomfort for the "bad" people and continues the fight, Kurt has achieved his goal.
For me, I don't try to engage him in reasoned debate. I expect that Kurt is quite capable of doing so if he wanted to. But he doesn't want to.
And I don't try to set him straight. He's not interested in being set straight, because truth doesn't have a whole lot to do with what he is trying to accomplish. (Kind of like Trump that is, although I take Kurt at his word (and believe) that he is not a Trump supporter.)
And most of all, I don't take put any stock in any insults he slings toward anyone. Who cares what some guy on the internet is saying to try to rile people up? In a week no one (and I mean no one of any consequence) will remember it.
Now I may throw an occasional comment his way, mostly in the hopes of helping out another human being in some small way, more or less because he's behaving in a way I view as unethical (just applying my own standard here) -- because he's a human being, just like me, and we all can use a little help now and again.
Frog: You do realize that the 'Gods Not Dead' board and Kristen Stewart board are entirely different boards, right?
You don't find it the least bit strange that Cosmo wants to bring a multi-member argument from the Stewart board to the GND board?
Are you aware that six IMDb members were in agreement with me that Stewart isn't exactly an A list actor, and about the same number of her groupies on the board believe she is?
And why is this topic being discussed on the GND board?
mostly in the hopes of helping out another human being
He actually has a sense of right and wrong
(Kind of like Trump that is, although I take Kurt at his word (and believe) that he is not a Trump supporter.)
most of all, I don't take put any stock in any insults he slings toward anyone.
Regarding your last point, I fully understand the outrage over being unjustifiably insulted in a heinous matter, and the tendency to ... want to not let this injustice stand! Been there, done that. But when you get right down to it, the insults will matter not at all to people in real life, and will pass quickly (very quickly) out of the memory to those on line. What's more, for me anyway, satisfaction is unlikely to be achieved in any event. Demands for apology are easily rebuffed, and responding with insults is ineffective because insulting others doesn't provide me much pleasure to begin with, and people with a lot of experience insulting other people (and a general lack of scruples) are far more effective at it.
So hey, it's your choice as to what to do, but you know what you're getting into with this guy. It might seem fun to begin with, but if you play with a scorpion (or a snake or a dung beetle or whatever) you're bound to get stung/bitten eventually.
stung/bitten eventually
I stated that Cosmo made the same argument as the pedos on the Stewart board.
But he does come across as rather feminine.
Cosmo got himself into this
Do they point out your hypocrisy over there as well then?
Are you now going to make a thread stating that only real men like real women?
Again, as you're struggling to comprehend. It's never been about Stewart, it's about your immense hypocrisy. Also the whole 'this is what a real woman looks like' misogyny, which itself was never about Kristen Stewart.
You wouldn't have anything in common with that thread either.
I'm in complete agreement with you on all that, and truth is that there's not actually much in the way of offense taken by him, however sometimes instinctive responses take over before reason gets to have a say. Frankly there are some things I can't not respond in similar sorts of ways to: homophobia, racism, sexism etc, and now accusing people of paedophilia. I am also aware that after months and months of trying to get people to believe he's a troll, he's come round full circle and actually become a full on troll, but I've got a bit too much stubbornness about me to let it all pass without comment.
shareCosmo, what kurt said was unforgiveable. You have my sympathies.
I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000
Your coworkers have my sympathies Film.
1) Cosmo can't explain why he follows me to other boards.
2) Cosmo can't explain why he refused to comment on the Stewart board if he's so interested in defending her.
3) ....or why he insisted on bringing his Stewart arguments to the GND & GND2 boards
4) And cosmo owes me an apology for insisting that he can have an opinion about Stewart but I can't without his condemnation.
He's basically busted with no defense.
Cosmo, what kurt said was unforgiveable. You have my sympathies.
I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000
1) Cosmo can't explain why he follows me to other boards.
2) Cosmo can't explain why he refused to comment on the Stewart board if he's so interested in defending her.
3) ....or why he insisted on bringing his Stewart arguments to the GND & GND2 boards
4) And cosmo owes me an apology for insisting that he can have an opinion about Stewart but I can't without his condemnation.
Film's ironic statements for the week. lol
So this justifies calling someone a paedophile? I see
I have sympathy for anyone who faces crude personal slurs.
There was also some unpleasant implications from your condemnation of 'sissy' comments & etc, but I am sure I am mistaken.
Whatever, you are just making weak justifications for what is still an unpleasant slur and in the UK could even be actionable.
I have sympathy for anyone who faces crude personal slurs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you should read you own obnoxious comments on various boards.
I sincerely believe cosmo is a wuss.
in the UK could even be actionable.
Please link to where I have made crude personal slurs against anyone. I am assuming that, as always, this substantiation will not be forthcoming.
so you are being disingenuous.
wuss
Please link to where I have made crude personal slurs against anyone. I am assuming that, as always, this substantiation will not be forthcoming.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you even type a pleasant comment?
I sincerely believe cosmo is a wussy
Is wuss below, or above, muppet and jackass?
I will leave him to answer to your name calling.
So no answer then, just a straw man?
I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000
Why would you care again?
shareBecause I asked you a question and hoped for an answer.
I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000
So no answer then, just a straw man?
So this justifies calling someone a paedophile?
Is wuss below, or above, muppet and jackass?
Perhaps you aim to steal his lunch money at recess too?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So this justifies calling someone a paedophile?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not entirely sure what cosmo is, but I do know that he made the exact same argument as the pervs on the Stewart board.
You being a jackass, Muppet, is far worse than cosmo being a wussy.
Muppet
Cosmo, what kurt said was unforgiveable. You have my sympathies...
So you can stop with the "I forgive you' cr*p.
I am sure he will find this backtracking worth noting.
Is being called a militant atheist worse than being called a paedophile?
Will it affect my insurance premiums?
As already said, I normally forgive the jibes and insults you direct against me. Those particularly objectionable comments made against others, made worse through implicit homophobia, are different since I can hardly forgive you on their behalf. In addition, I have never said that I will forgive you all the time . You will know, very obviously, and in no uncertain terms when I do not forgive you. But fortunately you have a way to go in this objective, my friend, so I will leave it to you to keep trying - all the while you object to the 'ridicule' supposedly felt by your invisible cyber constituency, naturally.
"backtracking..."? Again...I have no idea what fetishes he's into
I think this has been covered repeatedly
You're an idiot.
will get you a trip to hell.
Were you confessing to being one of the two (militant atheist, paedophile) in question?
Over a year ago you had a perfect opportunity to have civil discussions with me. If you'd simple said, 'I'm agnostic, and don't know if God exists'
You brought on the rude banter by admitting that you're here for sadistic "entertainment"
you're mad
Muppet
I still see you provoking other people on other boards
AND UNLIKE COSMO, I BRING IT TO YOUR ATTENTION ON THOSE BOARDS,
instead of being a little girl and bringing the controversy to this board where your atheist friends can help fight big, bad Kurt.
Best to tell him that your paedophiliac-homophobic jibes are to be ignored then.
so you now claim 'no idea' that your implications are made with a firm view in mind.
I wouldn't say having to put up with your continued aggression and personal rudeness is sadistic . Masochistic, perhaps lol.
I know for most believers reassurance in the existence of that whic they find comforting is what they prefer. But in the real world, away from Bible class and religious web sites with profusions of special pleading and apologetics at least, things just don't work like that.
Why are you shouting?
He follows me around everywhere. What am I to make of that? Sexual attraction? He's kind of flirty, don't you think?
I don't know about the pedo thing... I don't know what to conclude about cosmo. Is that what you mean?
I'd like to think he isn't
I'm straight and married to a woman. Just letting you know.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I know for most believers reassurance in the existence of that whic they find comforting is what they prefer. But in the real world, away from Bible class and religious web sites with profusions of special pleading and apologetics at least, things just don't work like that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're confessing to being sadistic
This isn't the Kristen Stewart board.
This isn't the Kristen Stewart board.
Which, one is sure, is source of disappointment to you every time - especially as you contemplate purported proofs for the non existence of God which you asked for - and apparently for which you have no answer lol
So Film: why do you have so many teen soft-core porn films on your list of movies that you've watched. I picked out about a dozen cheesy teen films you've watched.
I was, in my incarnation as a reviewer elsewhere paid to watch them -
I haven't sought out the Twilight films
don't spend my time with the fans over on the discussion boards for such things or drooling over actresses. I leave
I leave that to the teenagers and fanboys. You seem happy among them.
'kinky' and even 'dirty' which probably tells us more about your attitudes than anything.
Ok Film....as you requested. Your skin flick list of kink.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/
Bad Johnson (2014)
4.5/10
A charismatic womanizer receives his comeuppance after his penis mysteriously leaves his body and takes human form. (88 mins.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/
The Girl-Getters (1964)
7.1/10
In a seaside village, a group of local young men mingle among the seasonal tourists in search of sexual conquests... (93 mins.)
Director: Michael Winner
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
57.
Hideout in the Sun (1960)
4.9/10
Two brothers rob a bank and take a young girl hostage. They find out that the girl is a nudist, so they force her to take them to a nudist colony so they can hide out. (70 mins.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
The Sexploiters
Taglines: A picture that goes beyond your imagination!
Genres: Drama
Certificate: Not Rated
Parents Guide: Add content advisory for parents »
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/
Bad Guy
In busy downtown Seoul, a thuggish young man notices a fresh-faced college student who sits on a bench. He stares then sits next to her. She looks at him as if he's vermin, rises and walks to another bench. He sits staring. Her boyfriend arrives, she points to the stranger, the boyfriend shrugs and puts his arm around her to walk away. The stranger starts to leave as well, turns, goes to them, takes her face firmly in his hands and kisses her long and hard. The boyfriend tries unsuccessfully to break them apart, then soldiers beat the stranger. She demands an apology. He is silent. She slaps him and spits on him. They leave. The next day, he sets out to ruin her.
Creepy - Film fantasy?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/
14.
Kitten with a Whip (1964)
4.6/10
A rising political star faces scandal and blackmail when the young woman he tries to help turns out to be a juvenile delinquent. (82
Teen flick for it time period.
Hey...I noticed you deleted some films. No problem, I'll check my list that I used in response to that moron deviates who claimed you didn't have skin or teen flicks. lol
Bingo! I found some the kinky flicks that Film deleted from his list. Including College Girls
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0123705/mediaviewer/rm1285101056?ref_=tt_ov_i
College Girls
Member Review: "here's really not too much of a plot here and we're basically greeted with small stories that all are centered around sex. One story is a girl doing poorly in school so she sleeps with her teacher to get good grades and this follows with the teacher going home and raping his unwilling wife. We get a couple other misfits who sleep with incoming football players and we also get a wild party at the end where LSD is dropped, which leads to a bunch of topless dancing. As far as sexploitation films go this one here isn't too bad, although if you're expecting something great then you need to stay away from this film as well as every sexploitation film made. The softcore scenes are all rather silly but there are a couple erotic ones, which is probably the best work I've seen from this director. Performances are all laughable as is the score but the only reason this film was made was to show off skin and it does a good job at that. Another bonus is the fact that the film only runs 65-minutes so it "
Film! you dirty pervert. lol
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/
'Hair High' [Film watches teen flicks]
"Hair High" is a gothic high-school comedy with a "Carrie"-like story. Cherri and Rod are the high-school king and queen and they justifiably rule their domain. Spud, the new kid in town, accidentally offends both Cherri and Rod and so is forced to become Cherri's slave. Naturally, they immediately hate each other, but of course later they fall in love. Cherri and Spud secretly decide to go to the prom together, and on prom night a rejected Rod forces their car off the road and into the lake. In true 50's ballad style, their car sinks to the bottom of the lake as they share one last kiss. While the bodies of Cherri and Spud lie in a timeless embrace, Rod is successful in thwarting any investigation and is able to get away with murder. On the night of the following year's prom, the car magically comes to life and slowly drives out of the lake with Cherri and Spud, as if nothing had happened, only this time their bodies are in an advanced state of decomposition.
I kid you not, here's the stuff Film watches:
www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
etc. etc.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/ < teen school girl
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0962826/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055074/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044515/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/
LOL
And then I caught Film red handed today deleting two of the kinky skin flicks that WAS on his list of films watched, including College Girls, which is described in the story line as
SOFTCORE PORNOGRAPHY.
Busted you liar worm.
"backtracking..."?
And now you'd like to get involved in yet another private discussion that I was having with someone else on another thread?
LOL LOL
What have to you threat of reporting me to the proper authorities. LOL
"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates
What have to you threat of reporting me to the proper authorities. LOL
speculation
It's not difficult. You said that you'd report me to admin and get me kicked off IMDb, remember?
"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates
You said that you'd report me to admin and get me kicked off IMDb, remember?
Cosmo made the same angry rants they did.
"KRISTEN IS AGE 26, NOT UNDER AGED!!"
One of the most popular high selling porno magazines is a publication called, "Barely Legal".
I sincerely believe cosmo is a wuss.
Kurt enjoys bashing Kristen Stewart's appearance and acting ability on the Stewart boards, leading with 'she looks like a 12 year old'.
It's incredible the lengths you're going to just to justify bashing a woman's appearance - as if it somehow has something to do with you calling someone else a pedophile.
Yes, kids I like romantic stories.
get a constructive hobbit please
Enjoy Christmas even if you spit on the Bible daily.
I couldn't care less about your future. - FilmFlaneur
justify bashing a woman's appearance
Aimed at kids?
I think Bilbo's dad was a builder
calling people pedophiles (I'll let you keep your homophobia) is spitting on the Bible.
I'd argue that someone who claims to be a believer but goes around treating others like sh!t, calling people pedophiles (I'll let you keep your homophobia) is spitting on the Bible.
Come over to the Stewart board and defend her if you care so much about her, big mouth.
...wait...you already stated that you really don't care about her. lol
Bwahahahaha!!!
...and then this fool ironically stated...
I'll take that as an acknowledgement that you can't defend what you've said.
I'm guessing you didn't get the reference then.
It's not exactly Christ-like behaviour to go around calling people pedophiles.
claiming you're an expert on the discussion.
No
You called a guy a pedophile for no good reason. I don't need to be an expert on the discussion to see that.
I had plenty of good reason. Film just confessed that Stewart makes "teen movies", and he has no interest in discussing teen movies...
...OK deviates, you're standing in line at a bookstore and you're purchasing a three pack of 'Barely Legal', which involves nude models who are technically 18, but look 14 to 17 in age. Am I not allowed to conclude that you're attracted to jail bate?
Deviates:
I just went through Cosmos list and he gave Twilight 8 stars!!!!!
He then watched the other Twilight films and gave them low stars. Didn't like the leads? Who knows but he loved the first one.
He's watched over 600 films and nearly everything on his list is films appealing to teens.
Now...I'm just saying...he can't say that he doesn't like films intended to interest teens. Film made that claim today and got busted.
Cosmo even watched all the Police Academy films. LOL LOL
American Pie
etc. etc.
Which is fine, because I'm starting to conclude that cosmo is more normal than what I thought a few days ago.
But the surprise is Film:
Some of the sh*t he's watched almost qualifies as softcore porn. And he told me today that he has no interest in teen films. Geez I pulled out about a dozen examples so scroll back up and check them out. lol
Say where's you list of films that you've watched.
Embarrassed to show them?
lol
"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates
Seeing as you completely ignored the point, I'll repeat:
I had plenty of good reason. Film just confessed that Stewart makes "teen movies", and he has no interest in discussing teen movies...
...OK deviates, you're standing in line at a bookstore and you're purchasing a three pack of 'Barely Legal', which involves nude models who are technically 18, but look 14 to 17 in age. Am I not allowed to conclude that you're attracted to jail bate?
Say where's you list of films that you've watched.
Embarrassed to show them?
Kurt, you're the one who has watched the Twilight movies - teen romance movies. Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
I've not made a list, Kurt. It would take me hours to remember all the films I've watched and I'm not going to use IMDB to record my activities, much as I don't use Facebook or Twitter to do the same.
Cosmo watched Twilight and he gave it an 8. Film has watched all sorts of kinky teen flicks. And you've hidden your list of films that you watched.
Should I be concerned, or are you hypocritical again?
I had plenty of good reason. Film just confessed that Stewart makes "teen movies", and he has no interest in discussing teen movies...
...OK deviates, you're standing in line at a bookstore and you're purchasing a three pack of 'Barely Legal', which involves nude models who are technically 18, but look 14 to 17 in age. Am I not allowed to conclude that you're attracted to jail bate?
Oh well there you go. You expect others to play the game so that you can be critical and you hide your list. Hypocrite.
Kurt, you're the one who has watched the Twilight movies - teen romance movies. Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
I've not addressed the list of 'watched' movies that users have. You brought up Cosmo's and Film's. It's not a feature of IMDB I'm interested, my use or that of others.
Take four: Kurt, you're the one who has watched the Twilight movies - teen romance movies. Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
For Kurt the Kunt:
Wow! You're just an A-Hole douchebag everywhere you post! And you post so much, where do you find the time? I just stopped by to give you a message from Al. He knows how to dole out the perspective delicately.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jk6S_LdGC8
"You don't like Beethoven."
just stopped by to give you a message
Take five: Kurt, you're the one who has watched the Twilight movies - teen romance movies. Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
Kurt, you're the one who has watched the Twilight movies - teen romance movies. Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
Take six: You seem to have forgotten your own logic that you were applying earlier on, so let me refresh your memory and we'll go again.
You suggested:
1) Kristen Stewart appears in her films as an underage girl.
2) Cosmo/Film like teen movies (a claim you've not substantiated, but let's just go with your logic for now)
3) This interest in teens justifies you calling Cosmo a pedophile.
Soooo back to the question, for the sixth time:
Kurt, you're the one who has watched and enjoyed the Twilight movies - teen romance movies revolving around a star you have said plays underage characters. Based on YOUR OWN logic, what should I conclude from that?
(a claim you've not substantiated,
This interest in teens justifies you calling Cosmo a pedophile.
You keep avoid how your own logic reflects on you sooooo
<b>Take Seven: Kurt, you're the one who has watched the Twilight movies - teen romance movies. Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
Starting to feel like Paxman... Perhaps you'll answer the question before Michael Howard does.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyqnu6ywhR4
Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
That's the closest you've come to answering, we're getting somewhere! This time you acknowledged a question, even if you've cut out the context. I think Paxman asked Howard the same question 14 times, so we're not far off.
Take eight: Kurt, you're the one who has watched the Twilight movies - teen romance movies. Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
That's the closest you've come to answering, we're getting somewhere!
Kurt, you're the one who has watched the Twilight movies - teen romance movies. Based on your own logic, what should I conclude from that?
That I like romantic films and TV shows?
you had a problem with people watching films that focus on the sex-life of characters played by the actress, who as you claim plays under-aged all the time.
If this is your cryptic attempt....
Not much different from a Hallmark made for TV movies, for which you claim that you've never heard of the Hallmark channel. Another sad lie on your part.
they didn't deny the teen beloved films that cosmo has on his list of over 600 films
cosmo admitted to finding Stewart to be very attractive.
Why would Film deny movies on my 'list' (ratings are not the same as a list)?
what films you're on about and I certainly wouldn't call any of them 'beloved'.
I certainly wouldn't call any of them 'beloved'.
Yet again, and this repetition to you is getting tiresome, not something that's ever happened.
Out of the over 600 films you list to have seen were well liked by teens as well.
How much money do all those science fiction movies have to make before YOU would define them as beloved by an international audience, and particularly to youth culture? You're an idiot.
You did call her an attractive 26 year old. Better go delete like comment fast like you did with the Twilight rating.
I've made a separate reply rather than edit my original one so you've got no excuse for avoiding it.
films as in movies. Not FilmFlaneur the U.K. jackass.
Me and one of my girlfriends used to meet up just to go watch (in the movie theater) the latest Twighlight installment. No other movie. Just once a year. And we're not teens...lol . Then after Twighlight was over, we did the Hunger Games. It became a tradition for like, what 6 years? Or so...
I was team Jacob....I could not understand why any girl would chase after a guy that was putting her in constant danger of death, then abandoning her, then he ended up killing her....NICE... Plus, he'd probably steal my hairspray and then I'd have to divorce him and the Volturi would come and snap my head off... Oh dear...
Galena
*Free speech opinion w/ pseudonym internet moniker w/o malice for debate and discussion🌈
Team Jacob certainly would have been the logical choice.
shareFrom Kurt the Kunt:
Actually you missed me over at the Lucifer board. I'm flattered.
No one interested in chatting with you over there sandboy?
Must be the potty mouth thing.
And the fact that you offended literally everyone on that board.
Are you still angry with me sandman that I decided the Lucifer TV series is actually pretty good, or just mad because centrd and I made up.
All us nice people on the Lucifer board that enjoy the show got Christmas cards and cookies. You got zip because centrd says you're a sociopath that obsesses over vaginas.
I'm starting to feel like your unrequited love, sweetheart.
From Kurt the Kunt:
Are you still angry with me sandman that I decided the Lucifer TV series is actually pretty good, or just mad because centrd and I made up.
All us nice people on the Lucifer board that enjoy the show got Christmas cards and cookies. You got zip because centrd says you're a sociopath that obsesses over vaginas.
I'm starting to feel like your unrequited love, sweetheart.
With you being an A-Hole and a douchebag
For Kurt the Kunt:
As you've labeled me a troll, for some reason, you keep feeding me. With you being an A-Hole and a douchebag, no wonder why you keep responding. Nobody else would listen to you!
By the way, Al wants to give you some perspective.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm0TUif2K08
There. Fixed my post again for you. Try not to ego boost yourself so often. You're addicted. Just FYI. Listen to Al. His perspective is quite enlightening.👆
"You don't like Beethoven."
Film watches dirty teen flicks when he claimed to have no interest in the teen flicks.
You brought up Cosmo's and Film's.
You rated the first Twilight film 8 stars, so now you're busted telling another lie cosmo.
"I've not judged whether anyone is a person of faith or not..." - deviates
No he didn't, you blithering idiot. He rated it a 4, it even shows the date he rated it - 13th November 2014.
shareYou rated the first Twilight film 8 stars, so now you're busted telling another lie cosmo
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret kurt, but don't tell anyone: My rating are available for public view, so anybody is capable of going on there and seeing that you're lying if they so choose. Shocking I know!
I saw that you rated Twilight as 8 stars and the other films 4.5.
Then you announced today that you were going to change your 8 star rating to far less, because: "I must have been in a good mood that day".
Cosmo watched Twilight and he gave it an 8.
Ok kurt, you've been saying things that are basically as bad as your initial indiscretion in your discussion with Film, and that's just as out of order as the first one. Why don't you develop some morality and grow up?
Now...
Cosmo stated twice that Stewart is attractive.
I think I've earned the right to investigate cosmo's motives which are suspect.
You called a guy a pedophile for no good reason. I don't need to be an expert on the discussion to see that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had plenty of good reason. Film just confessed that Stewart makes "teen movies", and he has no interest in discussing teen movies...
The other groupies confessed they wanted to screw here.
Your buddy Film just gave me a list of his favorite films, on top of what I've seen in his history. The films he likes to watch revolve around just sexual assaults/rapes as the common denominator. Kind of a strange coincidence that so many of his mentioned films have rape scenes.
you're standing in line at a bookstore and you're purchasing a three pack of 'Barely Legal', which involves nude models who are technically 18, but look 14 to 17 in age
here's the stuff Film watches:
I hope that you are not making an assertion about me, kurt. You know what will happen.
You know what will happen.
At your place?
Blade Runner , Peeping Tomb , The Searchers and Apocalypse Now
He also has recurring fantasies, and has asked me if I have ones to match his.
here are the first four off that list which so shocks our kurt:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope that you are not making an assertion about me, kurt. You know what will happen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually I am
I told you that if you wanted to comment on Kristen Stewart that perhaps you should go to her board?
Your stupid lie-reply was: 'I have no interest in teen flicks'. I went to your list of films that you've watched and found a dozen cheesy teen or skin flicks. Some of them you ranked with 7 stars. Interesting that you should use the word sexploitation, because that's exactly a perfect description of these films, and the male audience they're intended for.
Moral of the Story:
cloths being torn off scenes/naked weirdness for shock value, etc
before you lecture others about liking the Twilight films, that many of the films you watch are rather...odd. Glass houses?
So I'm not suggesting that you're a loser
for lecturing other people that: 'I'm too intellectual to watch teen/skin flicks' when in fact you do.
remedial
Again...if you'd like to obsess over Kristen Stewart, perhaps it would be appropriate to join the discussion on the correct board?
Whoops...I typed '[want to screw] here' when I should have typed 'her'. Shucks.
and I didn't even vote on Blade Runner
or A.N
I don't have a rating on Searchers that I can find, so I have no idea what you're talking about.
They really aren't great films. Sorry
Stupid
The very reason you're not taken seriously on any board.
I suspect some of you are a bit gay
Actually people can look up your dirty films and find out what they're really about if they wanted.
Ok Film....as you requested. Your skin flick list of kink.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/
Bad Johnson (2014)
4.5/10
A charismatic womanizer receives his comeuppance after his penis mysteriously leaves his body and takes human form. (88 mins.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/
The Girl-Getters (1964)
7.1/10
In a seaside village, a group of local young men mingle among the seasonal tourists in search of sexual conquests... (93 mins.)
Director: Michael Winner
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
57.
Hideout in the Sun (1960)
4.9/10
Two brothers rob a bank and take a young girl hostage. They find out that the girl is a nudist, so they force her to take them to a nudist colony so they can hide out. (70 mins.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
The Sexploiters
Taglines: A picture that goes beyond your imagination!
Genres: Drama
Certificate: Not Rated
Parents Guide: Add content advisory for parents »
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/
Bad Guy
In busy downtown Seoul, a thuggish young man notices a fresh-faced college student who sits on a bench. He stares then sits next to her. She looks at him as if he's vermin, rises and walks to another bench. He sits staring. Her boyfriend arrives, she points to the stranger, the boyfriend shrugs and puts his arm around her to walk away. The stranger starts to leave as well, turns, goes to them, takes her face firmly in his hands and kisses her long and hard. The boyfriend tries unsuccessfully to break them apart, then soldiers beat the stranger. She demands an apology. He is silent. She slaps him and spits on him. They leave. The next day, he sets out to ruin her.
Creepy - Film fantasy?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/
14.
Kitten with a Whip (1964)
4.6/10
A rising political star faces scandal and blackmail when the young woman he tries to help turns out to be a juvenile delinquent. (82
Teen flick for it time period.
Hey...I noticed you deleted some films. No problem, I'll check my list that I used in response to that moron deviates who claimed you didn't have skin or teen flicks. lol
Bingo! I found some the kinky flicks that Film deleted from his list. Including College Girls
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0123705/mediaviewer/rm1285101056?ref_=tt_ov_i
College Girls
Member Review: "here's really not too much of a plot here and we're basically greeted with small stories that all are centered around sex. One story is a girl doing poorly in school so she sleeps with her teacher to get good grades and this follows with the teacher going home and raping his unwilling wife. We get a couple other misfits who sleep with incoming football players and we also get a wild party at the end where LSD is dropped, which leads to a bunch of topless dancing. As far as sexploitation films go this one here isn't too bad, although if you're expecting something great then you need to stay away from this film as well as every sexploitation film made. The softcore scenes are all rather silly but there are a couple erotic ones, which is probably the best work I've seen from this director. Performances are all laughable as is the score but the only reason this film was made was to show off skin and it does a good job at that. Another bonus is the fact that the film only runs 65-minutes so it "
Film! you dirty pervert. lol
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/
'Hair High' [Film watches teen flicks]
"Hair High" is a gothic high-school comedy with a "Carrie"-like story. Cherri and Rod are the high-school king and queen and they justifiably rule their domain. Spud, the new kid in town, accidentally offends both Cherri and Rod and so is forced to become Cherri's slave. Naturally, they immediately hate each other, but of course later they fall in love. Cherri and Spud secretly decide to go to the prom together, and on prom night a rejected Rod forces their car off the road and into the lake. In true 50's ballad style, their car sinks to the bottom of the lake as they share one last kiss. While the bodies of Cherri and Spud lie in a timeless embrace, Rod is successful in thwarting any investigation and is able to get away with murder. On the night of the following year's prom, the car magically comes to life and slowly drives out of the lake with Cherri and Spud, as if nothing had happened, only this time their bodies are in an advanced state of decomposition.
I kid you not, here's the stuff Film watches:
www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
etc. etc.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/ < teen school girl
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0962826/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055074/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044515/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/
Ok Film....as you requested. Your skin flick list of kink.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/
Bad Johnson (2014)
4.5/10
A charismatic womanizer receives his comeuppance after his penis mysteriously leaves his body and takes human form. (88 mins.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/
The Girl-Getters (1964)
7.1/10
In a seaside village, a group of local young men mingle among the seasonal tourists in search of sexual conquests... (93 mins.)
Director: Michael Winner
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
57.
Hideout in the Sun (1960)
4.9/10
Two brothers rob a bank and take a young girl hostage. They find out that the girl is a nudist, so they force her to take them to a nudist colony so they can hide out. (70 mins.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
The Sexploiters
Taglines: A picture that goes beyond your imagination!
Genres: Drama
Certificate: Not Rated
Parents Guide: Add content advisory for parents »
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/
Bad Guy
In busy downtown Seoul, a thuggish young man notices a fresh-faced college student who sits on a bench. He stares then sits next to her. She looks at him as if he's vermin, rises and walks to another bench. He sits staring. Her boyfriend arrives, she points to the stranger, the boyfriend shrugs and puts his arm around her to walk away. The stranger starts to leave as well, turns, goes to them, takes her face firmly in his hands and kisses her long and hard. The boyfriend tries unsuccessfully to break them apart, then soldiers beat the stranger. She demands an apology. He is silent. She slaps him and spits on him. They leave. The next day, he sets out to ruin her.
Creepy - Film fantasy?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/
14.
Kitten with a Whip (1964)
4.6/10
A rising political star faces scandal and blackmail when the young woman he tries to help turns out to be a juvenile delinquent. (82
Teen flick for it time period.
Hey...I noticed you deleted some films. No problem, I'll check my list that I used in response to that moron deviates who claimed you didn't have skin or teen flicks. lol
Bingo! I found some the kinky flicks that Film deleted from his list. Including College Girls
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0123705/mediaviewer/rm1285101056?ref_=tt_ov_i
College Girls
Member Review: "here's really not too much of a plot here and we're basically greeted with small stories that all are centered around sex. One story is a girl doing poorly in school so she sleeps with her teacher to get good grades and this follows with the teacher going home and raping his unwilling wife. We get a couple other misfits who sleep with incoming football players and we also get a wild party at the end where LSD is dropped, which leads to a bunch of topless dancing. As far as sexploitation films go this one here isn't too bad, although if you're expecting something great then you need to stay away from this film as well as every sexploitation film made. The softcore scenes are all rather silly but there are a couple erotic ones, which is probably the best work I've seen from this director. Performances are all laughable as is the score but the only reason this film was made was to show off skin and it does a good job at that. Another bonus is the fact that the film only runs 65-minutes so it "
Film! you dirty pervert. lol
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/
'Hair High' [Film watches teen flicks]
"Hair High" is a gothic high-school comedy with a "Carrie"-like story. Cherri and Rod are the high-school king and queen and they justifiably rule their domain. Spud, the new kid in town, accidentally offends both Cherri and Rod and so is forced to become Cherri's slave. Naturally, they immediately hate each other, but of course later they fall in love. Cherri and Spud secretly decide to go to the prom together, and on prom night a rejected Rod forces their car off the road and into the lake. In true 50's ballad style, their car sinks to the bottom of the lake as they share one last kiss. While the bodies of Cherri and Spud lie in a timeless embrace, Rod is successful in thwarting any investigation and is able to get away with murder. On the night of the following year's prom, the car magically comes to life and slowly drives out of the lake with Cherri and Spud, as if nothing had happened, only this time their bodies are in an advanced state of decomposition.
I kid you not, here's the stuff Film watches:
www.imdb.com/title/tt0060461/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
etc. etc.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0148746/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1050160/ < teen school girl
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053908/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365296/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0962826/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055074/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2091325/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058267/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044515/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307213/
And I found the two films you deleted from you list today, you stinking worm liar.
The third time kurt has posted this, and so my answer will suffice, now also thrice repeated:
Kurt I am still struggling to work out the purpose of all this. Perhaps you can explain?
First of all, I have not 'deleted' any reviews yesterday or recently, so I am not sure how you came by that notion and you will need to substantiate it. I wait, as always lol... One also notes that you are the one who recently I remember, claimed a 'mistake' and increased your score for GND2 and gave Apocalypse Now a '9' while simultaneously decrying it. I am certainly not worried by anyone looking at the films I have watched or reviewed. Why should I be? There is nothing illegal, or shocking - except perhaps to the prurient and those who, apparently, don't watch much outside of Hollywood blockbusters or teenage girl cinema lol
Secondly , none of this shows that I have an interest in the contemporary vogue for teenage saga movies, or the actress Stewart, in whom you have such an abiding interest. Which was, and still is the point
Thirdly, as already pointed out, I have reviewed hundreds of films on this site, many of which were edited and carried over from another for which work I was paid. One can review a film without personally liking it or endorsing it, as I am sure you might understand.
Fourthly I am not sure why you are assuming such faux moral outrage against a whole swathes of different films of which one can take it you do not approve. You are entitled to your opinions, as am I, expressed in reviews perhaps, but your sweeping condemnations and disapproval of so many films (many of which, one suspects you have not even seen) is something only explicable to yourself. What is the purpose? As already noted some of your assessments of what are world classics have been risible.
Fifthly , a glance of the films you pull out above with a summary shows that none of them are of special interest to the teenage girl market. I couldn't be bothered to look up all the rest. They do, however reflect a gauche and hasty assessment of a variety and range of films, any adult content of which which apparently disturbs you.
Sixthly if it is true (and I didn't see the claim) that
deviates claimed you didn't have skin or teen flicks. lol
I'm well aware that railing does no good kurt2000
you stinking worm liar
You requested these responses, so don't play the pretend game that you don't know what its about:
** YOU CLAIMED, and deviates also re-enforced your claim, THAT YOU HAD NO INTEREST IN JOINING ME AT THE KRISTEN STEWART BOARD since you seemed to demonstrate a great interest in discussing the issues that originated and were intended for that board.
Cosmo for some strange reason, wanted to bring the the talking points from that board to the GND & GND2 boards, which makes no sense to me.
YOU STATED THAT YOU WEREN'T INTERESTED IN DISCUSSING TEEN FILMS.
And I caught you red handed telling that lie.
Because your list of viewed films included lots of teen flicks and skin flicks. You actually spent considerable time viewing these kinds of films - so you lied.
On another related point, I'd like to believe that you're not really into rape scenes, assault, domination of women, mindless nudity for lust value and other aspects that your viewer list suggests. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But I don't know you or cosmo enough to know for sure.
Cosmo on the other hand is still suspect. Today he claimed that he never defended Stewart or characterized her as "attractive", which is a dirty dog faced lie. So he's walking down the path of telling one lie after another.
But today I did point out something to cosmo which he admitted to not knowing. Stewart was born in 1990. She turn age 18 in 2008. SHE ALREADY HAD 20 FILMS TO HER CREDIT AS AN UNDER AGED TEEN. And so she continued to perform under aged roles well after she turned 18. This is why she's known for playing an under aged actor. The perverts of this world who are her groupies wanted to screw her, and openly admitted this, when she was a minor. Pedophiles in the closet. I give cosmo the benefit of the doubt that when he was defending her and calling her attractive, he was confused about the issues BEING DISCUSSED ON THE STEWART BOARD. (Why are you yelling: because you don't pay attention Film, and cosmo is still an ahole anyway.)
In conclusion: The discussions I was having with people on the Stewart board were my discussions. Not your discussions since you weren't involved. Stewart, regardless of fame status, achieved one impressive accomplishment. She made $80 million dollars before age 25, and that's something that few actors in history have accomplished. I found that interesting even though you claim to have no interest in anything relating to her but decided to chime in on a conversation you were never a part of in the first place.
You requested these responses
YOU CLAIMED, and deviates also re-enforced your claim, THAT YOU HAD NO INTEREST IN JOINING ME AT THE KRISTEN STEWART BOARD since you seemed to demonstrate a great interest in discussing the issues that originated and were intended for that board.
YOU STATED THAT YOU WEREN'T INTERESTED IN DISCUSSING TEEN FILMS
Because your list of viewed films included lots of teen flicks and skin flicks. You actually spent considerable time viewing these kinds of films
I'd like to believe that you're not really into rape scenes, assault, domination of women, mindless nudity for lust value and other aspects that your viewer list suggests. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But I don't know you or cosmo enough to know for sure.
Today he claimed that he never defended Stewart or characterized her as "attractive", which is a dirty dog faced lie. So he's walking down the path of telling one lie after another. today I did point out something to cosmo which he admitted to not knowing. Stewart was born in 1990. She turn age 18 in 2008. SHE ALREADY HAD 20 FILMS TO HER CREDIT AS AN UNDER AGED TEEN. And so she continued to perform under aged roles well after she turned 18. This is why she's known for playing an under aged actor. The perverts of this world who are her groupies wanted to screw her, and openly admitted this, when she was a minor. Pedophiles in the closet. I give cosmo the benefit of the doubt that when he was defending her and calling her attractive, he was confused about the issues BEING DISCUSSED ON THE STEWART BOARD.. Stewart, regardless of fame status, achieved one impressive accomplishment. She made $80 million dollars before age 25, and that's something that few actors in history have accomplished.
repeated 4 times
lack of appreciation for whole swathes of cinema lol.
being paid to review a film does not mean one has an abiding interest
'I have interest in' are clearly not even aimed at a female teenage audience
I'd like to believe that you have a wider, balanced and more adult appreciation of cinema and the way reviewing works
*Yawn* As already noted, Stewart seems to exercise you far more than it ever will me
That was your doing because you wanted to make sure no one thought you watch kinky flicks.
Your evasiveness tactics don't work with me.
'College Girls' film was reviewed by one member as "softcore" pornography".
IMDb recommended that if you like that film, or related films by the director, check out 'Women in Prison' softcore flicks. You were attempting to convince readers on GND2 that you're above all that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
being paid to review a film does not mean one has an abiding interest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're really that hard up for money, send me your post box mailing number and zip code and I'll send you $20 so you can get a Christmas meal. Geez Film...
I included examples of films on your list that were designed for teens and plenty more from past decades that I didn't even mention.
Tell me what you thought of the award winning, highly acclaimed film, "Last Tango in Paris" by acclaimed director Bernardo Bertolucci, and how would you rate it. Or just tell me if you thought it was good.
I already knew from last year that you thought Twilight and Stewart were a **yawn.
And you revealed that the only reason you chimed in was to defend cosmo's virtue.
The only problem is that you and cosmo have no interactive relationship. When you two came to this board, you got into an exchange with cosmo, decided you no longer wanted to chat with him, and turned your back on the guy long ago. If I were cosmo I'd send you a PM and say: 'I can take care of myself. Big, bad Kurt doesn't scare me.' The word we're looking for here to describe your chivalry is, 'disingenuous'.
Did you want me to post on all four of your locations or just two locations, GND & GND2?
Tell me what you thought of the award winning, highly acclaimed film, "Last Tango in Paris" by acclaimed director Bernardo Bertolucci, and how would you rate it. Or just tell me if you thought it was good.
kurt! I would never watch such an appalling work of depraved filth! I am shocked you might have!
I would never watch such an appalling work of depraved filth! I am shocked you might have
-------------
Correct answer. At least you keep up with recent news updates.
A girl loved by two different boys, and she loves them both.
'Why were you ranting about a conversation on another board that you were never a part of in the first place, for an actress you couldn't care less about.'
What happened to...."I'm not going to speak to Kurt anymore and I'm going to run to the administrator to remove him"?
- Cosmo
What happened to...."I'm not going to speak to Kurt anymore and I'm going to run to the administrator to remove him"?
- Cosmo
No. You said that you were going to turn me in to the admin and get me kicked off.
Remember?
I think that would certainly mean you don't want to chat any more.