This was an average movie. But so are many secular films made by Hollywood. They don't bother rating those down , but they make it a purpose to repeatedly rate down movies that are even marginally Christian. Such a waste of time and energy.
"Life is like a box of Krispy Kreme donuts".
I agree with you on this one 100%.
sharemany secular films made by Hollywood.
So no true atheist would rate up a Christian film?
Yeah, just explain everything away with zero evidence kurt-2000
Look at the 700 Club. On IMDB Its rated a 2 something. And its mostly news. Its not even really "religious" programming.
Are you trolling or what?
shareLook at the 700 Club. On IMDB Its rated a 2 something. And its mostly news. Its not even really "religious" programming.
Robertson has made almost as many outrageous comments as Trump. He recently said it's ok to hit kids that don't believe in God. Which is child abuse in the first degree.
" Just wish we could have the old board back, with fun people who like discussing the show" - Centrd
Got any evidence for that? No? Shocking.
shareThus the reason the member star ratings are mostly 1 or 10. The battle line was drawn.
32106 IMDb users have given a weighted average vote of 4.9 / 10
Demographic breakdowns are shown below.
Votes
Percentage
Rating
9997
31.1%
10
2142
6.7%
9
2325
7.2%
8
2212
6.9%
7
1735
5.4%
6
1414
4.4%
5
919
2.9%
4
966
3.0%
3
1384
4.3%
2
9012
28.1%
1
Arithmetic mean = 5.9. Median = 7
Median = 7
Median is the middle value from all the votes - so with 32106 votes you're looking for the 16053th highest/lowest vote, which would be a 7.
shareso with 32106 votes you're looking for the 16053th highest/lowest vote, which would be a 7.
Median isn't skewed by large or tiny values in the same way the mean (average) is. It's not particularly important with the sorts of ratings IMDB uses as the data set is limited between 1 and 10.
shareI'm an atheist and:
The Man From Earth, 8/10.
Noah 7/10
What Dreams May Come 8/10
Exodus: Gods and Kings 6/10
God's Not Dead 2/10
The point? I don't judge a movie based on it being religious. I based my opinion on if the movie is good or not (subjectively). In this case, for this movie, it's a POS. That's not my atheism speaking, that's my movie fan speaking.
but they make it a purpose to repeatedly rate down movies that are even marginally Christian. Such a waste of time and energy.
I think it has to do with atheist insecurity issues.
So what insecurities do you have over Kristen Stewart, assuming you're still obsessively knocking her and her fans on that board?
Lets go over the talking points
I explained to them that she's in love with another woman.
Here's the further proof that you don't read comments, and have a comprehension problem.
you fawning over an, admittedly impressive, busty young lady.
links to a half naked Kate Upton
had to explain how you don't understand how sexuality works, what with the fact that she's also dated guys.
I'd wager you can't justify your continued dislike of atheists on here when there's very little difference between us a
Well straight guys tend to do that. I forgot you'd be easily offended.
Stewart is skinny to the point of looking ill
Last time I checked, you had numerous critical remarks about all the actors you didn't like as well, so your argument is hypocritical as usual.
Any straight male Brit would have said, 'Right on Kurt'. You're pathetic. Grow a pair.
The conclusion is that she's a playgirl.
I never said that I disliked deviates. I simply said you're a jackass. It's not confusing.
So then kurt, why did you choose to ignore the post that showed up your idiocy? It's this one by the way ---> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2528814/board/thread/263295506?p=2&d=263512031#263512031share
Go on kurt, let your homophobia shine through.
She really isn't, but I'd rather not get into a discussion about her appearance,
I expect you to come back with evidence
any decent human being would look down on you
women should look pretty
Heaven forbid a young person goes through more than one relationship before finally deciding whether or not to settle down. What a bitch!
Perhaps you should read my post again.
I don't care if you're gay, but keep your comments to yourself regarding Upton if you're a gelding.
If you don't care then put a sock in it
I don't recall of any actors or films that you like.
Once again, you don't represent anyone on IMDb.
Any straight male Brit would have said, 'Right on Kurt'.
Stewart made $70 million for the Twilight films alone, you toad. And yes, she should have looked pretty for those films. That's a reasonable expectation for movie fans. Grow up.
Had you bothered to read comments for a board you're obsessed with, you'd know that.
No. Your posts are stupid enough the first time around.
What a long rant. Get a life Cosmo. No I don't share your twisted views.
And turning your back on your fell Brit, Kate Upton, to defend the anorexic hack Stewart is lame.
I know you don't agree because you've got no sense of self-awareness
I'm curious... If you're not a fan of KS, why do you frequent the KS forum?
shareMy reasoning for that was also presented to all the fanboys on the Kristin Stewart board: To recap -
I watched all the Twilight films (five) and liked them. But I had a big problem with Stewart being cast. Her involvement as the principle lead for all five films is the reason I don't own the films. I met a number of other people on the board who had a problem with KS, and a fight broke out.
In the aftermath, I agreed that KS did a good job in four other unrelated films, and we all agreed on the board that 'Café Society' was a pretty good Woody Allen film. So there is no universal hate among the board critics.
But the fanboys still want to date her and have sex with her. Which isn't likely going to happen.
Ok, so you initially went to the KS board to express your "big problem with her being cast" in the Twilight films, and you got sucked in. If that's an accurate assessment, would it be fair to say that some, if not all, the atheists on this board experienced something similar?
(Incidentally, I'm not a KS fan, either.)
It's because she's not pretty enough and doesn't look like a woman should look like, which I think means busty and scantily dressed. Such is the world according to kurt. It's a good job he's not a Christian with those sort of views.
shareIt's because...
Why not, he's your spokesman and representative. Actually no he isn't, because you're not a Christian according to him, as I just got reminded of while bored and reading through old threads (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2528814/board/thread/254974330?p=2&d=255104676#255104676).
More specifically, it's far easier to spot his true meanings by reading what he actually says, when he says it, rather than taking any notice of his attempts to justify or explain himself, what with his aversion to honesty and all.
So that's a yes, then?
Were you really reading through old threads simply because you were bored? If I had to bet, I'd say you were looking for something.
More specifically, it's far easier to spot his true meanings by reading what he actually says, when he says it, rather than taking any notice of his attempts to justify or explain himself, what with his aversion to honesty and all.
If I had to bet, I'd say you were looking for something.
Can we spot his "true meanings" by reading what he actually says...or not?
Is there a specific reason why 'people of faith' are so unbelieving of people's intentions?
Also, do you ever consider not being antagonistic?
Red herring.
You're saying that he's honest when he actually says something, but when he tries to explain or justify what he said, it should be disregarded on the grounds of dishonesty.
when I say that confuses me and I ask for simple clarification, I'm being antagonistic. Did I get all that right?
We are pattern seeking creatures and I've noticed one. That is all.
FFS!
when you feel your back is up against the wall
I just don't believe it was.
Lucky for you, I care even less now than I did when I first asked, so never mind. Jeez.
when you feel your back is up against the wall
-------------------
It would seem you're seeing things that aren't there.
It was a flippant comment that you apparently don't care about yet chose to focus on.
You're wrong
If you don't care then let things go once in a while
What part of "never mind" did you not understand?
I didn't neglect anything, the part that I quoted was an incorrect assertion by you as to my own view on a situation, which was the only by bit that was worth replying to.
One does not need to care about something to comment on it.
Looks like one of us hasn't let it go yet, and it ain't me.
Yeah ok, Hobo. Whatever you say.
shareWell there's a standard and predictable reply to a post that points out your own failings on here. And as always it's not a rant.
No I don't share your twisted views.
And turning your back on your fell Brit, Kate Upton
Says the alleged male that who dissed Kate Upton. Get some glasses, hermit.
Well there's a standard and predictable reply to a post that points out your own failings on here. And as always it's not a rant.
No I don't share your twisted views.
And turning your back on your fell Brit, Kate Upton
Says the alleged male that who dissed Kate Upton. Get some glasses, hermit.
Anyway, I'd still like to know what a non Christian such as yourself is still doing commenting on a pro-Christian film, seeing as you're vehemently against such actions, as your past comments towards atheists have shown?
Not that it ever stopped you from bashing religion.
Pot meet Vernuf kettle.
This was an average movie. But so are many secular films made by Hollywood. They don't bother rating those down , but they make it a purpose to repeatedly rate down movies that are even marginally Christian. Such a waste of time and energy.
You Atheists get triggered easily
The acting in this isn' t bad. Its okay. Not great. Yeah, and Lifetime movies are often considered average, but not always horrible. I don't watch many of them, granted. But there are so many secular films that are far worse than this.
"Life is like a box of Krispy Kreme donuts".
You Atheists get triggered easily
You said earlier that you liked the 10 Commandments?
I believe the quality for anything remotely Christian/Biblical seems to set at a higher standard than your average film, though. Like Ceicl B. Demille, most non Christians may not have a highly unfavorable opinion on it. And also same with even The Passion. They would rate those films probably at least adequately. But those films are intense in many ways
An average movie with an average budget like this, however- my point was, if its Christian, its going to be under more scrutiny and viewed with more disdain than a secular film of the same caliber. That is all I'm saying.
"Life is like a box of Krispy Kreme donuts".
An average movie with an average budget like this, however- my point was, if its Christian, its going to be under more scrutiny and viewed with more disdain than a secular film of the same caliber. That is all I'm saying.
Okay guys what did you rate other films with the Religion plot keyword?
18. God's Not Dead (2014) 1/10
I already shared what I thought about this film.
17. La chiesa (1989) 3/10
A bad bad horror movie.
16. Boyhood (2014) 4/10
A neat idea but was poor in execution.
15. Prince of Darkness (1987) 4/10
A weak John Carpenter movie. Seemed interesting but the plot is a mess.
14. Captain Salvation (1927) 4/10
First half of the movie was very good. Then things go downhill because of "because movie" moments.
13. Ben-Hur (2016) 5/10
The beginning of this movie is SO boring. Things pick up after Judah get captured.
12. Angela's Ashes (1999) 7/10
This is a good drama film. It goes back and forth between fun and sad.
11. Possession (1981) 7/10
A very scary film.
10. Breach (2007) 8/10
Interesting true story of how a CIA agent uses religion to get close to a double agent.
9. The Song of Bernadette (1943) 8/10
Very good movie. A bit long.
8. The Wicker Man (1973) 8/10
A scary story of a English cop going to an island controlled by a Pagan cult.
7. Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) 8/10
Kinda fits this list I guess.
6. Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970) 9/10
I really enjoy this film. More than others. I'll admit it's kinda dumb.
5. The Exorcist (1973) 9/10
Great horror film.
4. The Ten Commandments (1956) 9/10
Great movie. The filmmakers are able to take a story I already know and make it entertaining.
3. Inherit the Wind (1960) 9/10
I probably enjoyed this more than our religious friends on the board.
2. Religulous (2008) 10/10
I probably overrated this lol. Been forever since I seen it.
1. Planet of the Apes (1968) 10/10
All time classic film.
Beneath the Planet of the Apes
Bad things about the film off the top of my head
1. The girl who got cancer couldn't even produce tears. I'm not a good actor but if I try I can do that. He attempt at crying is horrible.
2. The intro sucks. It's dreadful and the editing is so bad. It doesn't convey what the movie is going to be. Or maybe it does because this movie is bad. So maybe I'm wrong and the intro works because the movie sucks.
3. The ending was such an F-U ending. I hate those I really do. I bring grades down in other movies for doing those so there's no reason I shouldn't do that here. The atheist professor getting hit by the car and confessing that he then out of the blue believed in Jesus was a terrible ending. All the build up for that? Come on! That's bad writing.
4. Everyone is a stereotype. Every character being a stereotype doesn't make for an interesting drama. Characters should grow and change.
5. All atheists in the movie are jerks. That's not realistic. And in this drama it's makes the movie uninteresting. This movie is based in the real world so Professor Radisson should have been a more realistic character.
6. Cinematography is bad. You'll noticed when it starts pouring rain in near the climax of the film that it only effects Professor Radisson and no one else sitting on tables like 10 feet behind him.
Okay 6 things pal. Why don't you tell me some good things about this movie.