And along with this iconic ship, Chewie, Lando, C-3PO AND R2-D2 will die, too. All part of KK's "vision".
Don't believe me? Check out the latest Overlord DVD videos on YouTube, and his reporting of a screening.
EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BooFfgCvw1M, for those who are asking.
The millenium falcon is a pile of junk. It will be good to see the back of it. And C-3PO always annoyed me that mincing faggot. It's worth losing R2-D2 just to get rid of him.
Quasimodo, what is your problem? You've been bashing His Dark Materials on HBO every chance you get, and now you're bashing Star Wars genre favourites! What gives?
Well what you have to understand about me apparently is that I am more than a bit of a cunt. But I stand by what I have said for whatever that is worth. The Star Wars movies are massively overrated and the adoration they get is laughable. And His Dark Materials is looking like a typical BBC hack job.
[deleted]
I want Rose Tico funko pops !
Well, I'd take anything by Overlord with a pinch of salt. I figured Lando would die (like he was originally meant to in Jedi), so I'm ready for that. But destroying the Falcon, Chewie and the droids doesn't make any sense. Why would Disney destroy any chance of using them (esp. Falcon and droids) in future productions?
However, Disney is insane at this point, so anything is possible. If they do as Overlord is suggesting then they really will have driven a wooden stake through the heart of Star Wars, and henceforth Disney will be dead to me.
Word on the street is they have to pay Lucas royalties for use of OT iconic characters etc. My guess is destroying/killing everything and introducing new characters is their way of saving a few bucks.
shareExactly, Disney doesn't want to keep anything pre-Disney. It's okay though, I implore everybody to vote 1 star for the Disney Trilogy on IMDB.
shareI'm still rooting for a final scene where Mary Sue's light saber quits working, she taps it on the table of the Falcon a couple of times to no effect, then looks straight down the lens of the thing to see if she can find the problem . . . when it suddenly comes-on.
shareYou would have to be an absolute tool to believe anything overlord says , amusing
shareAnd what if his sources are correct? You'll lap up Disney Star Wars all the same, I'm sure.
If its good , yes i will lap it up and be very happy , if its as bad as last jedi i will be dissapointed, i wont waste years on movie forums wasting my time repeating the same shit day in day out of why i thought it was bad as you have.
shareI haven't, not as much as some.
No, you'll just waste your time repeating the same shit day in and day out, complaining about people who express how it's bad.
shareIt is just a rumor, but a believable one. It would be in line with the ignominious end Disney's been giving everything else from the OT and PT, likely because they don't want to pay Lucas his contractual cut from using anything from the previous films. Following the money usually leads to the truth.
Disney's treating SW with all the reverence of Hasbro and Transformers, unceremoniously killing off characters and iconic ships to make way for new toys. (Excepting of course when a film tanks so hard they need to resurrect already-dead ones to lure fans back, hah.)
Wow. Thats actual;ly what killed the transformers series back in 1986. Its actually starting to make sense now.
shareIt does, doesn't it? There's also the fact, I recently found, that when Disney bought SW, FOX still had distribution rights to the OT movies in perpetuity. So they had even more reason to kill-and-replace them in the public mindshare. Now Disney owns FOX, too, but the damage is already done. :(
share[deleted]
In the end, it's always about the money.
I'm kinda thinking that Disney's losing their ass on this deal between failing Galaxy's Edge, low/no movement on merch, Solo tanking, TLJ hated, and 9 looks like it's shit its pants on the launchpad.
I guess Disney's making Star Wars into another Disney Princess franchise wasn't the best move.
Sure this will become a study case in future business/economics courses in the future - "How to kill a golden goose".
shareExcept that these people aren't stupid, and they are motivated by money. I think it's about a 'public/private' partnership between government & business, engaging in SJW social engineering. There's no way mentally ill SJWs comprise a significant percentage of the population, and no way a major corporation like Disney isn't able to do the market research to understand what the fans want from a 40 year old franchise. This is all about normalizing mental illness and the concomitant deviant behavior in the population.
Unfortunately for Disney, fu#ktards in pink pussy caps don't spend money on SciFi flicks, much less the Chinese made merch.
They ARE stupid, though. And yes, they're motivated by money. If their motivation for money led them to piss off all the old fans of the series and tank their movies with ideas that aren't bankable then I would definitely classify that as stupid.
shareYeah, I get what you're saying, but I'm still going to go with this being a social engineering operation, working hand in hand with the objectives of our criminal regime in Washington.
shareThat sounds ridiculous. QUITE ridiculous.
Disney is in this to make money and are making the same mistake all the other companies are making: trying to cater to some imaginary audience that doesn't exist while giving the established fanbase the bird.
The fact of the matter is that many of us legacy Star Wars fans are "aging out" in the eyes of Disney and they're trying to "cater to a new generation" with these products and they think that "Woke" is "the future" and it's not. Kids today just don't care for Star Wars--not on any measurable scale. Us old fans who grew up with the damn things are the main draw and they're pissing a large chunk of us off.
It's not called ridiculous, it's called propaganda, and it's done everyday by media companies in partnership with the government to achieve long term objectives.
Here's some background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_influence_on_public_opinion
While the CIA's supposed purview was foreign, domestic operations were/are also carried-out by either it or other agencies.
It's really no different than the WWII wartime propaganda that came from Hollywood that we're all familiar with.
Thats too bad cvause just like Transformers. The new characters don't have the brand power to keep the series going on into the future. If this is all true then why did Disney invest in the mandalorian? Thats nothing but nastalgic characters.
share