Anyone Buying JJ Abrams Not At Fault For This Movie Fiasco?


A Reddit leak and a rogue movie editor are blaming Disney for this disaster. Disney supposedly went as far as editing the movie without Abrams knowledge. He was against the Reylo kiss, too. And now an actor is asking for the director's cut. NO THANKS! We fans have been punished enough!

I'm not buying any of it. I'm sure Disney came up with lousy ideas, but Abrams went along with them. Someone DIRECTED the Rey and Kylo kiss. And lazily DIRECTED the spaceship battle. And hired a hack DC movie writer as well as recycled the long dead Palpatine which made no sense.

reply

Yeah, I've been wondering if JJ's team is sowing the media with this information to provide him cover.

reply

Hell no! Jar Jar shares as much blame as anyone else for why the Di$ney trilogy was a total clusterf*ck disaster. I've got not time for any of that ridiculous shill revisionism that's an obvious attempt to patch up Jar Jar's increasing reputation for f*cking up iconic franchises.

reply

Now that’s a threadkiller.

reply

I think there's a bit of true and a bit of misinformation there.

Abrams is a one-trick man: mystery boxes. He probably didn't know what to do with the final movie. Yeap, I can believe that Disney edited without Abrams knowledge... but they probably did so because they saw Abrams completely lost.

If Abrams had had some clear ideas about what to do with this movie, Disney wouldn't have interfered. He's not some indie starting director. Leaks said that he was doing some kind of 'modular' movie. That means building generic pieces (battle between Rey and Kilo, final battle, Chewbacca being kidnapped, final kiss, and so)... even though you don't really know how to combine them. Watching Abrams wandering around without any clear goal or idea, Disney probably decided to do some damage control and interfere.

reply

I believe Iger and Kennedy were likely involved, but only dictating to Abrams what fan service they wanted: Palpatine, Reylo kiss, OT rehash. The rest of the mess is Abrams because it's similar to what he has done in his other movies. He copies, not creates. Very sloppy storytelling (if you can call it a story). It's also a rush job with continuity errors and plotholes. He creates mysteries which he never solves (Lost). Abram's MO.

And he hired hack Chris Terrio (Batman v Superman, Justice League) as a cowriter. Why? It was the writer's job to come up with a good story.

I found an interesting video about Abrams lack of talent on youtube re: "Rise".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BD5mLw0A8vI

reply

what mysteries did he not solve in Lost?

reply

Most of them.

reply

Examples?

reply

Nice try but Abrams already admitted on the Howard Stern show years ago that he never intended to solve any of the mysteries because he thought the show was going to be canceled in its first season. I stopped watching Lost around the third season after I realized mysteries weren't going to be solved. I really hate bad writing and Abrams is a hack.

reply

oh man that sucks. Many things were answered. But even if everything wasnt i loved the heck out of that show. It was about the characters for me. and some of the episodes after season 3 were pretty damn epic. "The Constant" in season 4 is widely regarded as one of the best episodes of any TV show. Plus Ab Aeterno(Richard origin episode)Across The Sea(smoke monster origin episode), season 5 episodes that dealt with time skips and time displacement, flash sideways in season 6, etc. One of my favorite shows.

reply

Abrams had to make up stuff when the show wasn't cancelled. A "Heroes" promotion assured people that unlike that other show, their show would answer all the mysteries.

reply

Many things were answered.

Nope. They gave some quick patchy explanation that left LOTS of plot holes and didn't make any sense.

The only explanation that really made sense was the purgatory theory... which only worked for the first half of the series. I think that was probably the original (planned) ending, but then they kept launching even more mystery boxes until they didn't know how to solve the whole thing and gave some 'just because my balls' final.

reply

I heard on a number of podcasts that Iger promised JJ creative control in order to lure him back for IX, that JJ immediately started working with Lucas on fixing the problems created by TLJ.

I know you've said you don't think that there was a Lucas cut, are you also saying that you think Lucas wasn't involved at all?

reply

No way was Lucas involved. Lucas even said that Disney didn't want his ideas or have him involved. Lucas would've introduced new material, new art, had a story and character development. This movie is nothing short of incompetence and ruins his original movies by undoing the storytelling and character arcs.

It's obvious a noncreative was making key decisions that helped ruin this movie. Lucas had complained in an interview about studio execs making creative decisions for his earlier movies which they had no business nor talent doing. Lucas funded the SW movies (after New Hope) to maintain creative control.

reply

I knew that Disney bought Lucas' story treatments for VII, VIII, & IX.

Judging from the prequels, I'm not surprised that Disney didn't use them, but it seemed plausible from the reports that JJ could have pulled him in to get things on back on track.

Interesting, thanks.

reply

Lucas thought that Disney bought the treatments because they would use them. Iger's intention may have been only to keep Lucas's story ideas underwraps. I refuse to read his dopey book to find out.

It's common for business people to not risk money by using only the popular and proven which would be the OT. That's the complete opposite of art and creativity. Iger is retiring soon, so maybe the new CEO will have more backbone and we'll get something more than fanfiction.

"JJ could have pulled him in to get things on back on track."
"Rise" derailed big time. JJ movie using Iger and Kennedy's "suggestions".

I liked the prequels. At least they were original.

reply

I believe Iger and Kennedy were likely involved, but only dictating to Abrams what fan service they wanted:

Disagree: Disney's very hierarchical, and Kennedy's professional reputation & legacy was riding on the success of these films.

Between Iger's & Kennedy's professional reputation & legacy in the final years of their career, much less their egos, these films were probably micromanaged to within an inch of their life.

The end product and performance of the films testify to that.

reply

Fan service is 90 percent of the film. We're actually agreeing.

I'm just not buying Abrams as an innocent since he went along with their master plan while making Force Awakens. That movie had issues too.

reply

Absolutely! JJ's a power player in Hollywood, which means he's a political animal first, and also means he's balls deep in this mess and (I think) working to cover his own ass and salvage his reputation.

reply

Now supposedly the SW fans are demanding to see a JJ Abrams director's cut of the film. I'm convinced that's Disney PR at work trying to drum up more money for this crappy film.

reply

Yep, I heard the rumors of a Lucas Cut as well. I could see fans clamoring for that, but not a JJ cut.

There's some serious PR/Marketing fuckery going-on that almost makes me wonder if they're trying to cultivate a window for a 2nd Release.

That would be a trick worth watching from a business perspective.

Has there been a movie that's pulled that off in the past 100 years of cinema?

It really is amazing. I wouldn't have believed it if you'd of told me 40 years ago that the greatest entertainment value of a new Star Wars release will be everything about the movie, but the movie itself.

reply

Lucas had nothing to do with this crap. I notice Disney repeatedly brings up his name to legitimize their movie messes. Notice how he's a no show at the premiere this time.

"Has there been a movie that's pulled that off in the past 100 years of cinema?"

Superior Director's cut of the Lord of Rings trilogy made fans rebuy the DVDs. Perhaps a bump up in DVD sales for a few other movies including SW. I have the original theatrical version videos and the special editions.

An Abrams edit would still be garbage. Bringing back Palpatine was plain dumb.

reply

Yeah no wonder these new films were better than his prequels. Thank God Lucas wasn't involved,

reply

"Those films are overrated garbage. I am glad Star Wars is dead it was never good to begin with."

Trekkie!

reply

Nope Blade Runner fan here.

reply

No kidding . . . sort of had you pegged for a Lost in Space aficionado.

reply

WTF is wrong with you, Keelai? I'm much more of a Trekkie than a Warsian as well!

reply

"Superior Director's cut of the Lord of Rings trilogy made fans rebuy the DVDs."

HEY, the Extended Editions of LOTR are definitely worth it, I don't even bother with the Theatricals anymore. Don't diss the EE, Keelai!

reply

I think Abrams must model every action movie he does after his TV series "Lost" - frenetic pacing, random variety of characters, unexplained ordeals, etc.

I think Disney love his contributions because it harmonises with their wish to produce somewhat fluffy, derivative entertainment movies and television. Disney didn't invent Star Wars but now owns it, and now Disney structures it as it sees fit whether that is evocative of the original ethos Star Wars or not.

reply

Well said.

reply

Back in 2009 it seemed like everyone was talking about him like he was a genius. I didn’t see it.

reply

I considered Star Trek ruined the moment I saw the movie.

reply

I one hundred percent believe they chopped this movie in half against Abrams wishes to get more showings. Additional footage might explain some plot holes, but it's not gonna fix the choices they made.

reply

Jar Jar's The Rise of Skywalkers Ultimate Edition coming soon!

reply

No. But, I don't think that this movie is a "fiasco." The Rian Johnson crowd does, but I don't. Yes, there are things that could have been better, but that's true of all three films in this new trilogy. I personally hope that deleted scenes are released on the Blu-ray.

reply

Fiasco? The film is going to earn over a billion dollars and put something like half a billion dollars in profit into Disney's vault, with more to come from streaming, home video, merchandise, etc. Only in the minds of the most deluded Disney haters has there been a fiasco.

reply

Fiasco for fans who wanted a great SW story. How many more millions Iger takes home doesn't concern me.

reply

We fans of these new Star Wars got a good story. You old fans can suck on it. Disney bought Star Wars you will never get it back.

reply

You mean the story that was rehashed from the 40+ year old OT? LOL!

reply

Those films are overrated garbage. I am glad Star Wars is dead it was never good to begin with.

reply

You're not a very original troll, are you?

reply

Disney films own the prequels.

reply

So do I.

reply

Good.

reply

You really are a fvcking MORON, aren't you, MF505?

reply

Count me among what seems to be a large majority of fans who think the three new films are excellent, and a much needed shot in the arm for a franchise that was left for dead after the steaming pile of garbage that was the prequels. You may not like the new films, but to call three films that earned billions, pleased most viewers, and two of which were critically acclaimed, a fiasco is letting wishful thinking stand in the way of fact.

reply

[deleted]

why is he a troll ? because he has a differing opinion to you ? hes not wrong though is he ? most of the Disney star wars films are praised highly by the critics , did any of the prequels make a billion ? anyone that bashed IT 2 you called a troll aswell, showing to be quite the prick you and your merry band of bickering bitch haters.

how many other posts are we to expect from you until you move on from star wars ? 50? whine whine whine

reply

"most of the Disney star wars films are praised highly by the critics"
They have no choice but to give favourable reviews to Disney movies, or they lose their livelihoods. Haven't you sussed that YET?

"did any of the prequels make a billion ?"
Did I even mention the Prequels? Why bring it up?

"anyone that bashed IT 2 you called a troll aswell, showing to be quite the prick you and your merry band of bickering bitch haters."
IT Chapter 2 deserves more love from the critics, if it were a miniseries, they'd lap it up.

"how many other posts are we to expect from you until you move on from star wars ? 50? whine whine whine"
I haven't even STARTED yet.

reply

The old critics were paid claim , i think they were paid to give IT 2 good reviews considering most thought it was a snooze fest

reply

IT 2 is certainly rated higher than TROS, from two separate websites :)

reply