Star Wars Falling and Kathleen Kennedy Out of The Loop - Midnight's Edge


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL8t4WdoM0U

After a long some high profile misfires and nothing but repeated production trouble, even Hollywood is starting to openly question for how much longer Kathleen Kennedy can continue as head of Lucasfilm. In this video, we will look back at the timeline of events leading up to the imploding Obi Wan series intended for Disney+, as well as relay some new rumors which may give us an idea of what that future could hold.

reply

Midnight's Edge is awesome. Something needs to be done to take Star Wars back from the Feminists and SJW lunatics. They are fake fans and man haters.

reply

Men are at war right now. If we don’t act now, all men will be eradicated from this earth. Sometimes I just wanna punch ever woman in the face!

reply

Strings up Kathleen Kennedy as BurningSun's personal punching bag.

Here you go, have at her. Quit screaming you stupid bitch, nobody's gonna hear you, and I'm gonna tell everyone I knew nothing about this, so shut up!

reply

If you string her up by her neck, she'll soon be silent and you can punch all you like.

reply

[deleted]

KK made Disney another billion. Iger is very happy.

reply

So gross box-office equals net profit?

With business acumen like yours, you're most definitely a woman.

I'd recommend you for a job at Lucas, but it's also clear from your statement that you're a white woman - they got too many of that privileged class already.

reply

You incels have been saying that KK is on the verge of being fired for over two years now. Shut up with your nonsense, already! Iger wants money and the movie made it. I hate Disney Wars more than anyone, but I'm not living in a long drawn-out delusion like you are. She's not going anywhere. KK and Iger will be around to make more crap movies and TV shows for you incels to pay for.

reply

https://www.quora.com/Did-Disney-wreck-Star-Wars/answer/Anthony-Murlin

That being said, Disney/Lucasfilm done goofed by (in no specific order):

Hiring (and, later, rehiring) J.J. Abrams

Not having a cohesive vision (if not a fully detailed plot) for the Trilogy

Hiring Rian Johnson to do the 2nd Film in the Trilogy (and not reigning him in when they should have)

Letting Kathleen Kennedy (who, for some reason, forgot that she had basically Produced the vast majority of every Western Millennial’s most beloved TV and Film moments from childhood) go into this project with apparently no knowledge whatsoever about what the hell a “Star War” is or that nearly 40 years worth of novels, comic books, and assorted other media existed for them to draw plots and inspiration from. I mean, yeah, she’s “just a Producer”… but she’s also the head of freaking Lucasfilm.

reply

You and other fans want a good film. Iger only wants money and doesn't care about the quality.

Your link's author starts out well but then heads into fantasy. SW was never for kids. The original audience were teens and young adults. I'm a bit tired of "fans" claiming that Lucas had no talent. The so-called "brilliant" writer of Empire also wrote Solo which was complete garbage. "You're alone so I'll call you Solo." Sheesh!

Lucas hired KK not knowing how incompetent she would be as a studio head. Producer and studio head are different skill sets. Iger helped ruin SW with his let's just rehash the entire OT for easy money mentality.

reply

... as opposed to the 3+ billion it should have made?.

1 billion barley makes them any profit by some accounts ...

reply

When was the last time a bad movie made a billion?

reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Star Wars: The Last Jedi
Captain Marvel
Transformers: Dark of the Moon
Transformers: Age of Extinction
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides

Well there is 8 for you

reply

KK almost consistently makes Disney at least a billion dollars with bad movies. She's not going anywhere.

Six bad Disney movies each with a minimum one billion dollar box office. Disney is cleaning up. Iger is happy.

reply

OK you are confusing 1 billion dollars gross with 1 billion dollars net here.

If you generate 1 billion dollars in sales but you spend 900m in the process ... that is not you making 1 billion dollars at all, for example.

reply

In addition to that; Disney is still at minimum $2 Billion dollars away from seeing a RoI (Return on Investment). From a business stand point they have to know that after the first 3 sequel films they should have been closer or over that mark by now. Technically speaking Disney has not seen a dime of profit from the Star Wars brand yet, despite the unarguable financial success of the films (it did not make as much as it could have been but they are financially successful). Depending on how it goes it might be 10 more years before they see an actual profit.

reply

That crapfest movie didn't cost $900b to make.

reply

Kennedy should've been sacked YEARS ago. Many people have said that the reason she hasn't is because she has the dirt on many high-profile Hollywood executives and others. If they fire her, they go down, too, so they won't dare risk it.

reply

Her movies have made billions. She's not going anywhere. I bet Iger gave her a huge salary bonus at Xmas too because of all the money she's made the company!

reply

Why? because you didn't like the movies ? and what on earth are you talking dirt on who ? what dirt?

you need to look at the bigger picture, no matter how you perceive the ST they have made billions and are the most successful star wars movies ever made , only one has performed poorly, so why should she be sacked ?

reply

I think it was the Fandom Menace that mentioned the dirt.

And of course they will have made a lot, seeing as how they're the most recent and how new movies make more and more money as the years pass.

reply

"and are the most successful star wars movies ever made"

You don't know what you're talking about. None of the Disney Wars movies are even in the top 10 when it comes to ticket sales. Star Wars (1977) is number 2, second only to Gone with the Wind (1939). The Force Awakens is number 11. The Last Jedi is number 46. The Rise of Skywalker is number 87.

The list goes like this

#2 - Star Wars - 178.5 million tickets sold
#11 - The Force Awakens - 108 million tickets sold
#14 - The Empire Strikes Back - 98.2 million tickets sold
#16 - Return of the Jedi - 94.1 million tickets sold
#18 - The Phantom Menace - 90.3 million tickets sold
#46 - The Last Jedi - 69.1 million tickets sold
#66 - Rogue One - 60.4 million tickets sold
#73 - Revenge of the Sith - 59.4 million tickets sold
#87 - The Rise of Skywalker - 56.0 million tickets sold
#113 - Attack of the Clones - 53.1 million tickets sold
#? - Solo - ? tickets sold

So the original trilogy sold 370.8 million tickets combined. The Disney trilogy sold 233.1 million tickets combined. Even if you add the 60.4 million tickets from Rogue One, you are still ~77 million tickets shy of the OT's ticket sales.

reply

I wasn't referring to ticket sales , i was referring to Box office

reply

Box office revenue isn't a valid metric for comparing the success of movies throughout history, because the value of money is constantly changing, and so is the price of tickets. Star Wars sold as many tickets as The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi combined. The Disney movies are obviously not the most successful Star Wars movies ever made; not even close.

reply

Yes they are , more successful than the prequels, and more successful than the OTs original run

reply

Your tacit request to move the goalpost is denied.

reply

im just toying , i love the OT , greatest trilogy ever made and worthy of its crown , the sequels were pointless additions

reply

Lord of the Rings beats it. Better scores on rottentomatoes, metacritic, imdb and won more Oscars. You lost today kid, it doesn't mean you have to like it.

reply

"Lord of the Rings beats it."

Snorefest. Out of the thousands of movies I've watched in my lifetime, there are probably less than five that I found too boring to finish, and the third LotR movie was one of them. I saw the first two, and did finish them, but they were utterly forgettable and I've had zero interest in ever watching them again. The fans of LotR seem to be from the same crowd that played Dungeons and Dragons during study hall back when I was in school. "Look, I'm an elf!"

"Better scores on rottentomatoes, metacritic, imdb and won more Oscars. You lost today kid, it doesn't mean you have to like it."

Your argumentum ad populum fallacy carries no weight whatsoever. So no, he didn't "lose," since he stated an opinion, and opinions, by definition, aren't falsifiable. Anything that's falsifiable is a fact (or factual error), not an opinion.

reply

Couldn't care less your opinion on the lotr films. It is far better than the overrated star wars films. I like that generalization you made about people who enjoy LOTR. Yeah you know it's totally impossible for someone to just think they are good films they have to fit the generalization you came up with...

He in an earlier post stated that Star Wars was rated better than LOTR. That isn't an opinion that's a statement. I disproved that statement. He said it's the greatest trilogy ever, did he ever say imo? Nope he did not! If you are going to reply to a post not addressed to you know the post history between the people posting. You made yourself look ignorant, now kindly piss off.

reply

"He in an earlier post stated that Star Wars was rated better than LOTR."

That's irrelevant, since that's not the post you replied to, and you didn't reference any previous post of his in your reply.

"He said it's the greatest trilogy ever, did he ever say imo? Nope he did not!"

That it's an opinion goes without saying, because movie preferences are subjective.

"If you are going to reply to a post not addressed to you know the post history between the people posting."

You're posting on a public forum, obviously. Send him a private message if you want to ensure that you don't get any replies from people who don't know or care about you two's post history from other threads/subforums. Anything not present in this thread is irrelevant. If you want to make it relevant you have to bring it into this thread by directly referencing it.

"You made yourself look ignorant"

Comical Irony Alert

reply

Check your messages.

reply

Why are you PMing me, numbnuts? I didn't say to PM me, I said to PM the other guy "if you want to ensure that you don't get any replies from people who don't know or care about you two's post history from other threads/subforums."

And yes, when referring to something subjective such as movie, music, food, etc., preferences, it goes without saying that it's an opinion.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

That does it, you're going on Ignore, FS, I've flamin' well had enough of you.

reply

Hasta la vista baby

reply

[deleted]

At an end your rule is. And not short enough it was.

reply