[deleted]


[deleted]


It's too bad they threw out George's story outlines, it would have been interesting to see where he'd take the story and characters. They should never have gotten rid of Lucas. I know people hated the prequels, but I always thought he had good ideas, if he had just pitched the ideas and they brought on screenwriters to do the dialogue, this new trilogy could have completely redeemed him from the prequels.

reply

I agree, Lucas is an ideas man, however he has a spotty record fleshing them out himself. I would bet with virtual money :), the outlines he had for the latter three films wre better than what we have seen so far.

reply

[deleted]

I mean when it comes to putting it on screen, sometimes you have to adjust what is on paper for the screen. I say spotty as opposed to completely awful because his on screen work is inconsistent. He has had some good stuff and some bad stuff. I think its a fair criticism. Being nominated for a single writing Oscar in 1974 does not make all your work flawless. And to keep it in perspective, he has won a Razzie and been nominated a total of three times for worst screenplay. He has other nominations and awards but that doesn't change anything. His onscreen output as Director/Screenplay writer is limited, so the criticism can be made.

reply

No one got rid of Lucas...he was paid over four billion for his properties...he sold it all! It's like buying a new fully furnished house...you expect the old residents to clear out. the former resident doesn't want to be in the way and has a new place besides, so they want to be gone. Unfortunately...George hasn't been a pitch the idea guy nor the take advise from others kind of film maker for decades...and it shows when viewing any of the prequels. He was wealthy enough to self finance and surrounded himself with yes men like Rick mccullum...no one was around or willing to throw cold water on any of his bad ideas. There wasn't even any studio involvement during the production as Lucas self financed...only allowing fox to distribute to keep continuity with the fan fair. The idea that he would have been able to work with Disney is ludicrous....Lucas just ain't that kind of film maker...and Disney not that kind of partner!

reply

gl's outlines are still the basis for the st.

reply

[deleted]

yes they are.

reply

[deleted]

that interview was before he watched the film. lucas had a female jedi main character, a stormtrooper who defects. han solo dying and luke having no academy as well as a bunch of other stuff. jj and kasdan did a lot of their own things but used gl's ideas.

when lucas gave that interview he didn't know what was in the film.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah jsnification's claims sound made up. The only thing George ever said was they didn't want to use his ideas after he sold the rights. And clearly he was pretty disappointed by that and by the film that was made.

Why bother with pesky things like facts when we can just make up our own reality.

reply

[deleted]

morons. do some research.

reply

[deleted]

You do realize that the OT was never actually all that original, right? It owes so much to Flash Gordon, among other properties.

Oh and ROTJ was a far more direct rehash of ANH than TFA could even dream of.

reply

Return of the Jedi was completely different from A New Hope. Yeah, they redid the Deathstar, but the opening with rescuing Han, the speeder chase sequence on Endor, the confrontation between Luke, Vader, the Emperor, the final battle of Endor. I'm really not seeing the similarities. Whereas, it is abundantly clear Force Awakens is beat for beat A New Hope.

reply

"Whereas, it is abundantly clear Force Awakens is beat for beat A New Hope"

It definitely isn't "beat for beat." TFA has many differences.

reply

Wrong, TFA is exactly the same story structure as ANH. But, TFA somehow did a worse job of it.

reply

Your argument is stretching it on all levels. Believe me, I know all the points of reference for the original Star Wars. TFA is not a Flash Gordon remake, it's a Star Wars remake.

ROTJ in not more of a remake of Star Wars than TFA...not by any stretch of the imagination. ROTJ is the third chapter in a complete story. TFA is a remake of ANH.

Case closed.

reply

"Case closed."

LOL, what an investigation! Especially amused at my "argument" stretching it on "all levels," especially since I barely posted anything.

Frankly I've seen enough mindless TFA hate that refuses to acknowledge anything that might dispute their views, so I'm not even interested in getting into a real discussion on the merits of fantasy action movies.

I know the "it's a remake" crowd isn't quite as bad as the "Rey is a Mary Sue" crowd (which hilariously dances around any actual comparisons), but they both just want to back up their own opinion with "objectivity," which is a logical failure by itself.

If TFA didn't have a base that looked similar to the Death Star which needed to be destroyed, it would be almost nothing like ANH. That one iconic element just overtakes everything else, apparently.

TFA followed a plot and setting structure that was used in both ANH and The Phantom Menace, which makes it very true to the series.

reply

Didn't you read my post? You're wrong. Take a basic film analysis class. CASE CLOSED.

You're the type that say's things like, "Well if it didn't have a death star like planet, and if Rey wasn't on a desert planet, and if Kylo wasn't dressed like Vader, and if Han wasn't in it, and if Leia wasn't in it, and if C3 PO and R2 D2 weren't in it, and if they didn't have Star Destroyers, and X-Wings and Tie-Fighters, and Admiral Ackbar, and if there wasn't a droid with secret plans that everyone was looking for, and if Rey didn't have force powers, and if someone hadn't escaped from the the evil guys, and if it wasn't in space, and if there wasn't the millennium falcon and chewbacca and if they didn't put Phasma in a garbage chute and if there wasn't a cantina scene and a green little creature, and blah blah blah...then it wouldn't even be close to being like the original Star Wars.

CASE IS CLOSED! YOU HEAR ME?!

reply

It's case closed dude.

reply

Nope, especially not with landofree

reply

Outside of the second Deathstar, I can't think of any similarities between A New Hope and Return fo the Jedi.

Let's look at TFA's similarities with ANH:

1) Starts off with Darth Vader and a bunch of Stormtroopers attacking Rebels.

2) After the initial attack, a major character is captured by the Empire.

3) Rebel plans are hidden in a cute little droid and sent across the desert.

4) An orphan finds the droid who is actually looking for someone else, but the droid is just happy because some little weirdos in the desert captured him and were trying to sell him anyway.

5) The Empire attacks, so they escape the desert planet on the Millennium Falcon.

6) A wise old mentor who was a hero in the previous saga tells the main character about the Jedi and the Force while on board the MF.

7) They go to a quirky cantina filled with strange aliens. Granted, in ANH, this scene appeared earlier.

8) This next scene was actually from Empire: the main character has a Force induced vision while in a dark, underground area while receiving some words of wisdom from a little Force sensitive alien.

9) Heroes meet up with Princess Leia and the Rebels.

10) The Empire uses a Deathstar to blow up planets/a planet as a show of force.

11) Heroes plan an aerial assault on the Deathstar and blow it up from the inside.

12) Mentor figure is killed by Darth Vader.

13) Orphan character finally uses Force powers to save the day.

14) Darth Vader is defeated, but manages to escape the destruction of the Death Star so he can be in the sequels.

Thought of a few more...

15) We later learn Darth Vader is working alongside a crusty Imperial officer and they are both taking orders from an ugly dude in a cloak who communicates via hologram (the hologram thing is mostly borrowed from Empire Strikes Back, granted).

16) When we meet Han Solo and Chewbacca, they are being chased by intergalactic criminals.

17) When Darth Vader kills the mentor figure, it's implied that the mentor knew he would die and offered himself up as a sacrifice.

18) Shortly after meeting the droid, the orphan gets into a fight with some local bad guys.

19) Han Solo is impressed by the orphan and begrudgingly offers a partnership because they are good in a fight.

20) Darth Vader interrogates the young female lead, but can't quite break her spirit.

reply

I completely agree with all the similar plot points you pointed out...there are likely more. HOWEVER, I whole-heartedly disagree that Han Solo was a mentor, or mentor-like figure to Rey, in any way shape or form. He gave her a ride and offered her a job. That's it. Han did the same thing with Luke in ANH, but he wasn't his mentor, was he? People are trying to push the idea that Han was her mentor, but that is fallacious and a lie. Look up the definition of "mentor", you'll find Ben Kenobi fits that definition, and NOT Han Solo.

reply

Yeah he was not a mentor by any stretch but the film gave him the mentor role without giving anything to do to demonstrate he was a mentor. How could he anyway, did anything about Rey suggest she needed a mentor? She was already perfect at everything.

reply

He was probably more of a mentor to Finn as he was telling Finn how to interrogate Phasma or how to sneak around. He was obviously full filling that role of the experienced old man who takes the young hero under his wing.

reply

EXACTLY!!!!! And telling Finn how to deal with women and to never lie. NOW THAT'S what a mentor does. But, alas, Finn was characterized as an idiot and I feel sorry for John Boyega for having to play such a slap-stick fool who always seemed to throw down his guns and runaway like a chicken. But, had no problem blasting his way out of that Star Destroyer with Poe and kill his comrades. Such terrible writing..and directing...and producing for that matter.

reply

Yet for some reason SHE was the most distressed at his passing and was also the MOST worthy of a hug.

reply

Yep, just bad writing.

reply

"Outside of the second Deathstar, I can't think of any similarities between A New Hope and Return fo the Jedi."

Then you're not trying very hard. They both start with getting someone off Tatooine, they both have a Tatooine cantina with a band in the beginning, the heroes meet up with the fleet to look at computer models of the Death Star and talk about leaked information that they received. I'm not really trying, just pointing it out.

I'm not going to turn this into a comparison competition, though, because I don't care about The Force Awakens being a very intentional homage to the entire Original Trilogy. I like that about it! Therefore, it is NOT "objective criticism," because some people simply don't consider it criticism at all.

Now, did The Phantom Menace ever get all this flack for slavishly following the form of A New Hope? I seriously doubt it, and I don't recall it.

http://alexplorer.net/starwars/movies/sw-parallels.html

I'm sure any TFA-basher who calls it a "reboot" of ANH, but likes TPM, would label "homages" to all of TPM's similiarities.

It's a worthless argument, and it has nothing to do with a movie's quality and entertainment value.

I also don't care that ANH was nothing more than Lucas remixing the Flash Gordon movie he tried to make initially (literal fact). I don't care how much he took from Flash, like the opening scroll, or the entire basic storyline of attacking a weapons planet run by an Emperor, with a young kid and a girl and an old man being the main characters.

reply

"They both start with getting someone off Tatooine"

True.

"they both have a Tatooine cantina with a band in the beginning"

False. That was not a cantina. That was Jabba's palace.

"the heroes meet up with the fleet to look at computer models of the Death Star and talk about leaked information that they received"

I already mentioned the Deathstar subplot. You just went into a little more detail.

"Now, did The Phantom Menace ever get all this flack for slavishly following the form of A New Hope? I seriously doubt it, and I don't recall it."

As bad as TPM was, and it was worse than TFA, it at least tried to do something new. The similarites are mostly superficial (ships look similar, someone says "I have a bad feeling about this", etc.)

reply

Jabba's palace ... in ANH?

Perhaps you are thinking of the begging of another movie?

reply

We're talking about Return of the Jedi, not A New Hope.

reply

What about the heroes dressing up as stormtroopers to infiltrate the dark sides hideout to save Leia/Rey?

reply

Yeah it is certainly looking worse and worse with every new reveal.

So much of it seems like it is all dependent on us being totally captivated and sold on Rey; so much attention is still on here. All that training montage stuff, and yeah the stupid saber training you rightfully call stupid. How about her demonstrating so much power and luke looking amazed and then said he is scared. SO freaking forced. And guess what, most of us were not sold on Daisey's Rey given how much they botched her story in TFA. Are they going to just ignore that and go with 'its cuz like she is just so powerful' excuse? What a joke.

reply

[deleted]

TFA was a terrible film; there is evidence all around of them not having any focus, plan or plot laid. Only a corporate agenda of, make it safe of star wars fans and attract more woman and minority audience members. And JJ gave them exactly that and did not at all bother to create any kind of logical structure for the first part. And because they decided to tie all the films together as one structure; this basically doomed the entire trilogy. if the first act is a complete illogical mess how are the second and third act suppose to make up for it?

reply

[deleted]

If it was a satirical look at what a politically correct star wars would look like than I would say it succeeded. But it was not a funny satire. Like South Park the last few seasons it has become more a depressing satirical look at modern american/western culture. I do not even watch it anymore because it was too depressing, not bad don't get me wrong, just depressing. The last episode I watched was a few seasons back were the celebrities were using Butters to filter out their hate messages and at the end rather than facing the personification of reality they hung him. It rang too true to what modern snowflake culture is like and depressed me almost to a point of hopelessness beyond the point of return.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah I could do that but the nonsense is just so... everywhere now. I can't even escape the nonsense in sports or movies. It is just freaking everywhere. It makes the satirical look at modern culture kind of discouraging. To the point to which I just have not watched south park in a few years. I likely will not watch star wars from now on either. Unless I torture myself just to review it bad later.

reply

[deleted]

Rogue one I was more mixed about but that might be because the nostalgia actually worked well in a pre-ANH film and the ascetics didn't feel forced even if the plot did. the characters were rushed and boring but not bad; like in TFA.

When it comes to the Solo film, it sounds like it is in shambles and honestly did anyone want to see this film?

Episode 9 firing the director and bringing back JJ? yeah that bodes well.

I have only watched episode 7 twice. The second because I couldn't believe it was really that bad. I have gone back and watched few scenes again to make sure i remembered them correctly when discussing the film. But my god it was bad the first time; it was literally painful the second.

reply

I liked Rogue One more than I thought I would because when I first heard what the story was about I was like I got everything I needed to know about that event in the opening crawl of Star Wars, I have never been the least bit curious about it beyond the result of it. So based on that initial thought I was pleasantly surprised by the end result overall was actually pretty decent. I had my issues with the film, I found the female lead uninspiring and not particularly likeable, and I felt Donnie Yen's potential in this was wasted, though I did like his character the most and the way the story wrapped up kind of lame as far as the characters' fates but I was still entertained.

So I guess I would say low expectation with nostalgia mixed helped me appreciate it more.

reply

"So I guess I would say low expectation with nostalgia mixed helped me appreciate it more."

I think you hit the nail on the head there. After TFA my expectations were in the toilet so I was pleasantly surprised by how not totally god awful Rogue One was. if it had come out first, before TFA, I probably would have thought it as bad as the prequel films. It coming out after TFA I thought it was nearly as good as Return of the jedi. funny how TFA being that bad made Rogue One look good by comparison. I mean the prequels look good by comparison too, and that is the prequels we are talking about; you know midochlorians, annoying kid Annie, and freaking JAR JAR.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Yeah and what was with that penguin looking alien? that just screamed of "buy more toys, buy more toys". Yeah Rey gonna be flying the falcoln, learning the force, being the princess (but not in distress ever), fighting the empire and defeating Ren the emperor all the while everyone stands around amazed at the wonder that is Rey. I mean they already did it for 7 and got a free pass why not do it for 2 more movies?

reply

"most of us were not sold on Daisey's Rey given how much they botched her story in TFA"

MOST of us????


"Are they going to just ignore that and go with 'its cuz like she is just so powerful' excuse? What a joke."

Did you give Luke flack for using the Force to bring down the Death Star even though he had never used the Force? Did you criticize Luke for being too old to train yet becoming a powerful Jedi? Did he get called out for being able to take on Vader even though Luke never had any actual lightsaber training and no one to spar with?

If there's anything I'm truly sick of, it's the sexist Rey-bashing. Just a bunch of brainless man-babies parroting some asshole from the internet because their manhoods are threatened by a fictional female character. It's so pathetic.

reply

When Luke first used the Force, it was at the very end of the story after he had received training from Obi-Wan. And even then, Obi-Wan was talking him through it at the time as a Force ghost. All things considered, it was a very minor usage of the power.

Rey was fighting with a lightsabre, moving things with her mind, and using telepathy in the span of about a day without ever meeting a single Jedi.

There is a HUGE difference.

reply

"When Luke first used the Force, it was at the very end of the story after he had recieved training from Obi-Wan."

He swung at a flying taser ball for a few minutes! That's not training!


"Rey was fighting with a lightsabre, moving things with her mind, and using telepathy in the span of about a day without ever meeting a single Jedi."

Yet she is shown to have memories of Luke's Jedi Academy getting destroyed when she was a child, which implies she had training that is blocked in her memory. You say she has never met a Jedi, as if you have already been given her entire backstory.

See? You've already decided the entire history of a brand new character that we know very little about!

This entire topic is just full of whiny B.S.

reply

"He swung at a flying taser ball for a few minutes! That's not training!"

It is still more than Rey got.

"Yet she is shown to have memories of Luke's Jedi Academy getting destroyed when she was a child, which implies she had training that is blocked in her memory. You say she has never met a Jedi, as if you have already been given her entire backstory."

This is a assumption. I assumed that the memories were from the lightsaber and not from her and there is just as much evidence of it.


"See? You've already decided the entire history of a brand new character that we know very little about!"

if we know so little about her why do you think it appropriate to praise the character and defend her?

reply

"He swung at a flying taser ball for a few minutes! That's not training!"

What makes you think it was for a few minutes and what makes you think that was all there was?

"Yet she is shown to have memories of Luke's Jedi Academy getting destroyed when she was a child, which implies she had training that is blocked in her memory. You say she has never met a Jedi, as if you have already been given her entire backstory."

Fan theories are just that... theories. If the next movie explains how she is so powerful, then I'll retract my statements. Until then, it's bad writing.

reply

"What makes you think it was for a few minutes and what makes you think that was all there was?"

The fact that there is a preamble of Luke not using the force, then Ben tells him to use the force "this time" (described as something you just instinctively feel) instead of consciously trying , and puts a bucket on his head to prove that the force is all it takes. Luke is totally skeptical but begins to use the force as order to, instead of consciously trying - Hey presto! instant success!!!

From not using the force to beginning to use the force to successfully using the force takes a couple of seconds in the film. Any alteration of that fact or supposition that there was loads of unshown "training" on the Falcon before that is fan theory. If there was training before that then it makes Luke's surprise and skepticism that the force is a useful thing here utterly preposterous without Ben saying to him "Have you just been ignoring what I've said taking the piss out of me while I've been telling you to use the force for the past hour?"


reply

He deflected one shot while "blindfolded". It's not nearly the same thing as fighting a Sith or using mind tricks or moving objects with your mind. Outside of that one deflection, he made a one in a million shot by focusing on the Force, meaning he was really really good at aiming for a second. It's not like he just wiggled his fingers and crushed the Death Star.

In the next movie, he can barely move his lightsabre to his hand to free himself form the Wampa's ice cave and that was 2-3 years later. He had to go to Yoda to be even remotely competent in the Force and even then, when he showed up to fight Vader, he got his ass handed to him and his hand was chopped off. He didn't complete his training until a few years later when Return of the Jedi took place.

It took Luke three movies to become a Jedi. It took Rey one afternoon.

reply

When did Rey fight a Sith? Just makes stuff up as you go, why don't you.

In the next movie, Luke preformed a skill that he never saw that Obi Wan was even capable of. And so he manages to intuit telekenesis as a power, without any training or even and inkling of it as a possibility before.

If you call defeating one injured an,, guilt ridden, tormented and underperfoming narcissist of undefined relative power in a fight becoming a Jedi then it's you that's jumping the gun. Your crap is poorly written, one might say.

You bring up Return Of The Jedi and ignore the fact that Yoda tells him he has completed his training BEFORE he's ever defeated ANYONE in a saber duel. So that screws fundamentally screws up your preamture definition of Rey as a Jedi.


Anyway. Back to where the goalposts where originally.

The "training" scene (actually just an exposition scene) tells us that using the force (to augment what skills you already have) takes being told to intuit it and then acting on those instincts, and can be demonstrated immediately with those instructions.

The amount of time "training" to achieve certain feats that some whackos expect or demand makes a mockery of Yoda's declaration that there is no trying. You either do it or you don't. Rey did it. Kylo Ren started to have to try, and got found out.

reply

"When did Rey fight a Sith?"

Were you not around for the final duel with Kylo Ren?

"In the next movie, Luke preformed a skill that he never saw that Obi Wan was even capable of. And so he manages to intuit telekenesis as a power, without any training or even and inkling of it as a possibility before."

We know that he had been communicating with Obi-Wan as a ghost. Aside from that, do you think Luke spent those years NOT meditating on the Force and trying to grasp its power? And again, we are talking about a span of a few years. If Rey did a little Force trick in TFA and the next movie started years later where we see her moving stuff with her mind, I'd be fine with that.

"You bring up Return Of The Jedi and ignore the fact that Yoda tells him he has completed his training BEFORE he's ever defeated ANYONE in a saber duel"

Wrong. At the start of Return of the Jedi, Yoda tells him he has to defeat Vader.

"The "training" scene (actually just an exposition scene) tells us that using the force (to augment what skills you already have) takes being told to intuit it and then acting on those instincts, and can be demonstrated immediately with those instructions."

True. That was what we saw Obi-Wan teach Luke. Who told Rey any of that?

"The amount of time "training" to achieve certain feats that some whackos expect or demand makes a mockery of Yoda's declaration that there is no trying. You either do it or you don't. Rey did it. Kylo Ren started to have to try, and got found out."

So if anyone can just use the Force without training, then why is there a temple? Why do apprentices need masters? Why waste time going to Yoda? Hell, why does Rey go to Luke? You are arguing that the entire concept of the Jedi Order is irrelevant.

reply

When did Kylo Ren become a Sith?

When did we find out that Luke can communicate with Ben? When the plot needs him too. Above the Death Star, and just before he's about to die on Hoth, to Luke's complete and total surprise "Ben!!!?".

Yoda tells luke he has completed his training. Then he tells him he must confront Vader because that's what the plot demands. If defeating a Sith is necessary to become a Jedi then how did all those padawans become Jedi with no Sith to defeat for a whole milllenium?

Max told Rey to feel the force around them. Let it flow and guide you.

Who said "anyone" can use the force without training? You drunk? Need to get some sleep?

Using the force and being a Jedi and the Jedi order are not the same things. If you can't understad that distinction, it's no wonder you're confused and lost.

reply

"When did Kylo Ren become a Sith?"

When he turned to the Dark Side. Whatever you want to call him, he's skilled in fighting with a lightsabre and knows how to use the Force. We know Luke was training him.

"If defeating a Sith is necessary to become a Jedi then how did all those padawans become Jedi with no Sith to defeat for a whole milllenium?"

Don't know. Ask George Lucas. It's not important to our discussion any way.

"Max told Rey to feel the force around them. Let it flow and guide you."

And you think that's all that's needed to be a badass Jedi warrior? So if Yoda walked up to, say, Han Solo and said "Feel the Force", Han would be able to use a lightsabre and move stuff with his mind?

"Who said "anyone" can use the force without training?"

You did. That is the basis for your argument.

"Using the force and being a Jedi and the Jedi order are not the same things. If you can't understad that distinction, it's no wonder you're confused and lost."

I am aware that Force users need training to use a lightsabre or start moving stuff with their minds. You're the one arguing that someone can pick it all up in an afternoon with minimal effort.

reply

"I am aware that Force users need training to use a lightsabre or start moving stuff with their minds. You're the one arguing that someone can pick it all up in an afternoon with minimal effort."

Luke took on Vader even though he had no one to train him in the use of a lightsaber.

Once again, you're pretending to know Rey's entire backstory and that she was never trained, not even in childhood at Luke's academy. Not even Rey knows her history due to her memory being blocked, but oh you just know IT ALL.

It's pathetic. Plus, you do realize you're debating fictional movie magic, right?

reply

"Luke took on Vader even though he had no one to train him in the use of a lightsaber."

And he got his hand chopped off and his ass kicked. What's your point?

"Once again, you're pretending to know Rey's entire backstory and that she was never trained, not even in childhood at Luke's academy. Not even Rey knows her history due to her memory being blocked, but oh you just know IT ALL."

You seem to be the one pretending you know about her history. When did it ever say her memory was blocked or that she trained at Luke's academy? Like I said, if they reveal that stuff in the next movie, I'll be okay but as of right now, I'm only going off what's shown in this movie and that stuff was never foreshadowed.

"Plus, you do realize you're debating fictional movie magic, right?"

So are you. If this discussion is pathetic, then stop engaging in it.

reply

So what you're saying is, you're ALSO WILLING TO BELIEVE that rey was a jedi master before turning 5 years old - lost those memories and now remembers them which will FULLY EXPLAIN HER SEUPERHERO STATUS IN TFA?

Honestly that is even more ridiculous.

reply

Who said anything about turning into a Jedi Master before being five years old? That would be a ridiculous idea, though, yes.

reply

It is important because you've based your assertion of Rey's achievement with Ren = becoming a Jedi because she defeated a Sith when there was a thousand years of Jedi who never even met a Sith.

I never said that or made it a basis.. You need to read closer.

When was it said that force users need training to "use a lightsaber" or move stuff. Never has that been stated or demonstrated. Luke never received training to movie his saber, but after a few futile attempts at making his body stretch a further three feet he (and the plot) decides he needs to do this so he does it.

I've argued no such thing so you clearly have nothing. Ta ta.

reply

"It is important because you've based your assertion of Rey's achievement with Ren = becoming a Jedi because she defeated a Sith when there was a thousand years of Jedi who never even met a Sith."

Never said that. I said she achieved multiple things in a short span without training. One of those things includes beating Kylo Ren who is a Sith, or at the very least, a trained Force user and lightsabre combatant.

"When was it said that force users need training to "use a lightsaber" or move stuff."

We outright see both Luke and younglings learning how to use a lightsabre in two different movies and Anakin and Obi-Wan make a reference to lightsabre practice in Episode II. Do you honestly think people just start swinging them around with that much precision without some form of training?

As for moving stuff with the Force, we see Yoda training Luke in Empire Strikes Back. Again, do you think these sort of things aren't taught at all? Not even a little? What would be the point of going to Yoda?

Again, you seem to think anyone can just start using Force powers and twirling lightsabres without the need of training.

reply

You're confusing ability with proficiency and mastery.

Luke began using the force ability to see laser blasts coming at him before they are even fired. Not from "training" but by being told by someone that feeling the force and using it can help him achieve it. Obi Wan could have told him that over the phone. But for the purpose of some folk's chickenshit arguments this is defined as "training" which must be replicated exactly. Bull.

reply

So why did Luke go to Yoda?

reply

To get better at doing what he has already discovered he can do. To learn about Jedi philosophy. To gain from another Jedi's experience. Because he's not a Jedi just because he has discovered that he can wield a magical power if he "feels it" and "uses it".

Because he stated that he wants to become a Jedi. Using the force and being a Jedi are not the same thing.

Tell me why you think that Rey shouldn't or doesn't need to receive mentoring in the ways of the force? Because she did one force pull? Because she surprised her tormentor and captor who choked and underestimated her power in the wake of killing his father for power that never came?

reply

That sounds suspiciously like training.

reply

Your point being?

Tell me why you think that Rey shouldn't or doesn't need to receive mentoring in the ways of the force? Because she did one force pull? Because she surprised her tormentor and captor who choked and underestimated her power in the wake of killing his father for power that never came?

Remember. Kylo is not Vader. Rey is not Luke. This is The Force Awakens. It's not A New Hope.

reply

So then a powerful Force user would need to do some training before they are actually competent in the usage of their powers?

reply

Luke became competent enough to block three laser blasts before they were even fired, without "training". Just by being told to use the force, which means acting on instinct, instead of consciously.

He desired more knowledge and more power so he went to Yoda at Ben's behest.

Guess what?

reply

Yes, Luke deflected a little laser (after failing the firs time around).

Do you think he would be capable of telepathy after that? How about levitating things? If Kylo Ren showed up and challenged him to a duel at that very second, could he win? Also, could he have deflected those shots without Obi-Wan or other Force users to guide him? Do you think that the time it took Luke to meet up with Obi-Wan, go to the cantina, and then fly to the Death Star, he only received the few seconds of training that we saw?

reply

So what's the point of having Luke use the force to deflect lasers then?

If Luke was exposed to someone trying to mind probe him, after he'd been told to feel and use the force, the he would intuit how to fight back. Just as you would if someone sat in front of you and challenged you to an arm wrestle, which you've never trued before. You wouldn't need training before you could wrestle them back. Who knows, you might possess the natural strength and balance to win the first bout.

I don't think. I know that Obi Wan tells Luke to use the force "this time". Obi Wan has to explain what that means (so clearly Luke hasn't been training in using the force prior to that if it still needs explaining). Luke is skeptical but he gives it a try. And he instantly succeeds in using the force.

And Rey failed to mind trick the trooper until the third attempt when she finally calmed herself enough to let the force flow. Similarly, Luke did not allow the force to flow the first time with the laser blast, as Obi Wan stated.

Nevertheless, the instantly succeed when they used the force as directed. They failed when they didn't use the force.

Luke had Obi wan to tell him to feel and use the force. Rey had Maz to tell her to feel and use the force. Same results each time.

reply

Same results? so Luke was using telepathy and levitation a day later and he was good enough with a lightsabre to fight a trained swordsman?

reply

He was using the force.

How do you know if Ren is a trained swordsman or how well trained he is?

Who did Luke spar with in order to learn enough to avoid being destroyed by Vader before he was able to escape?

reply

"How do you know if Ren is a trained swordsman or how well trained he is? "

It's outright stated he was trained by Luke and we see him killing at least one padawan in Rey's vision.

"Who did Luke spar with in order to learn enough to avoid being destroyed by Vader before he was able to escape?"

He escaped by throwing himself down a pit, potentially to his death. That doesn't take skill. Also, he just lost his hand and was on the run the entire fight. He got his ass handed to him.

reply

Trained at what, exactly?

We see Ren stab someone in the back in the vision. I can do that. And I have had no force training.

He avoided being destroyed first, with his lightsaber. And he had some success over his father before the thirty years of experience that Vader had began to really tell.

Nae luck, sonny.

reply

"Luke never received training to movie his saber, but after a few futile attempts at making his body stretch a further three feet he (and the plot) decides he needs to do this so he does it."

Yep, and he took on Vader in one-on-one lightsaber battles without ever receiving proper lightsaber training, or having someone to spar with.

...And that's against Vader, supposedly the best!!! Luke magically becomes a Jedi master just because the story demands it.

Rey-bashers will never admit as much. Never.

reply

Um... Vader kicked Luke's ass. What are you talking about?

reply

Luke beat Vader in ROTJ. Do you not remember that?

Now we must keep in mind for both Luke and Rey: Vader may not have wanted to kill Luke, and Kylo definitely didn't want to kill Rey (since he's trying to talk her into being his student during the fight).

reply

"Luke beat Vader in ROTJ. Do you not remember that?"

Oh, so you were ignoring their first encounter and talking about the very last chapter of an entire movie trilogy in which the hero had years of experience and training under his belt and even then, barely defeated Vader? Gotcha.

Last time I checked TFA took place over the span of a couple of days and Rey never met a single Jedi and literally picked up a lightsabre for the first time and won a fight.

reply

No we're just ignoring the spurious "winning a duel means you are Jedi" rule that people have invented.

The Republic produced "Jedi" for a thousand years without anyone to duel with. So that "rule" is bollocks.

reply

"No we're just ignoring the spurious "winning a duel means you are Jedi" rule that people have invented."

By people, you mean you? I literally have not heard that idea from anyone but you.

reply

Try reading the rest of this thread then.

A person who is strong with the force starts demonstrating force enhanced abilities immediately after being told to use and feel it, as demonstrated in ANH when Luke is ordinary until each time that Obi Wan tells him to use the force makes you.

If that bothers you then take it up with George Lucas.

If it just bothers you that Rey emerged victorious then you clearly haven't been paying attention to the actual drama and psychology of the people involved. The movies aren't just about force tricks.

reply

"Try reading the rest of this thread then."

I've read the thread. You are the only person that keeps brinigng it up.

"If it just bothers you that Rey emerged victorious then you clearly haven't been paying attention to the actual drama and psychology of the people involved."

There isn't much of that in this movie. The characters are pretty shallow.

"The movies aren't just about force tricks."

Agreed, but we are talking about Force tricks and sabre techniques at the moment. The previous movies (as well as the comics, cartoons, etc.) show that Force users still need training and logic dictates that you need to know some fencing techniques before getting into a sword fight and lightsabres should be no different. Even very powerful Force users tend to get their asses kicked unless they have someone that can teach them how to use their abilities such as when Luke failed to beat Vader or Anakin failed to beat Count Dooku. Additionally, it takes a while before they can master levitation. Luke and Anakin couldn't pull it off until their second movies. The same goes for mind tricks. Rey defied all of these previously established rules in the mythos.

reply

"Rey defied all of these previously established rules in the mythos."

A New Hope and the beginning of Empires Strikes Back established the rule - Strong force person is told to use the feel and use the force = Strong force can use the force from then on.

Rey does not violate that.

End of story.

reply

Oh, so then you DON'T think they need training. They just need a little pep talk about the Force? So then Luke didn't need to train with Yoda. He just needed the initial "Use the Force" from Obi-Wan and was good to go from then on?

reply

Have you watched A New Hope?

reply

Yep. Multiple times. I still have an old VHS of it.

reply

Does you VHS have the "training" scene, from which point Luke starts demonstrating force abilities, including one's he's never seen before, and before he seeks Yoda for formal training?

reply

It has a training scene between Obi-Wan and Luke onboard the Millennium Falcon with the implication that it extended beyond the one scene we saw of it.

This VHS copy also showed that Luke never did any Force tricks for the rest of the movie aside from hitting a small target without a targeting computer. Nothing too impressive when one takes telepathy and telekinesis into account. Also, he didn't even fight anyone in a lightsabre duel, let alone beat them. Funny that.

reply

You're dreaming. The instant Luke discovers he can use the force, they arrive at Alderann. No more training. Ben dies shortly after.

reply

How long do you think it took them to go from Tatooine to the Death Star? At least long enough that Obi-Wan was comfortable taking Luke into the back to show him a few things. It was likely a couple of hours or so. Not a massive amount of time, but still far more than what Rey got and Rey did far more than Luke in one movie than he did in two.

reply

The time between leaving Tatooine and the scene of Luke "training" is irrelevant because the scene itself introduces "using the force" to Luke.

He is not in the middle of receiving force training. Whatever "training" Luke might have received prior to this scene, it wasn't in using the force, because this is the first time he uses it. This is explicit in the scene.

Ben suggests using instinct. Luke says it's not possible. Luke does it. It succeeds.

reply

You think Luke got it on the first try? We see him fail at least once. For all we know, that tiny burst of deflecting lasers came after a few hours of trying to get it right.

If the Force was that easy to master, the Jedi and Sith would not be as important as they are as everyone and their mother would be floating shit around and stuff all day.

reply

But he wasn't using the force. In the scene shown in the movie, Ben tells him to start using his instincts, his feelings instead of consciously trying. This is the difference between not using the force and using the force.

Who said anything about mastering the force? Successfully sing the force in one mind trick and in one battle does not make you a master.

Just a never ending stream of lame strawmen coming at me now.

reply

Have you even SEEN a Star Wars film?

Luke is shown, MULTIPLE TIMES, being trained with lightsaber in hand.

reply

A multiple of 1x1 and it had instant results.

reply

"MOST of us????"

Sorry, many* of us.

"If there's anything I'm truly sick of, it's the sexist Rey-bashing. Just a bunch of brainless man-babies parroting some asshole from the internet because their manhoods are threatened by a fictional female character. It's so pathetic."

if there is anything I am sick of it is the crazed feminist praise of a poorly written character and their only defense is to cast labels of sexism and bash a different character from the previous trilogy. No defense whatsoever just name calling and deflection. and deflection that is not even correct see AP post below for why your Luke to Rey comparison is garbage.

reply

"if there is anything I am sick of it is the crazed feminist praise of a poorly written character and their only defense is to cast labels of sexism and bash a different character from the previous trilogy. No defense whatsoever just name calling and deflection. and deflection that is not even correct see AP post below for why your Luke to Rey comparison is garbage."

The fanboy TFA defenders are bad enough but it's these obsessive adolescent internet feminists who I do my best to just ignore. Most of them aren't even Star Wars fans and are merely latching on to MaRey Sue because of "Girl Power" It's the same thing every time. Any criticism of the poorly written character = "sexists", "man babies", "if she's a Mary Sue so is Luke", etc . It's like they're all following the same script.

reply

Yes it is very frustrating because they expect the rules and lore of Star Wars to conform to their modern films agenda. There is 40 years of continuity and lore that was broken in TFA; but that is okay because we have a diverse cast? I care more about story than political agendas and inclusiveness.

reply

The Luke to Rey comparisons have always been so poor. Nothing in the ANH is equal to the abilities Rey displayed. Hell Rey defeated a trained force user in her first film, while Luke got his ass handed to him at the end of ESB after he had a brief but intensive training by a Jedi Master. That event alone blows the comparison out of the water let alone everything else she did in the film.

The problem with the other poster is in reality quasi-feminist like that person have so little faith in women in film that they need them be even less realistic and more overpowered than their male equivalents for them to be accepted as tough.

On top of that, its clear that its female lead in Star Wars that they primarily care about and not the character or the actress. So they had already decided she was the greatest thing since sliced bread, before seeing a minute of film. (even though both PT and OT feature females as part of the leads, yet that seems to be ignored)


reply

Yeah the Luke to Rey comparison has to be the second most annoying defense of Rey. the first being "you're sexist" non argument. The comparison is just so utterly ridiculous. Luke never once has the upper hand. When He is finally powerful enough to confront Vader at the END of rotj he immediately gets owned by the emperor.

Yes this whole thing is politically and agenda driven so much so that it is impossible to not have it impact the story. Not that a politically driven film can't be good; but if the goal is all agenda and little concern is given to story or character development this is what you get. The nice thing about it is those that had their biases satisfied, like crazy 3rd wave feminist loving Rey, will defend the story and character even in the most fallacy driven manner imaginable.

reply

I don't know if Rey is a Mary Sue character, because her past hasn't been revealed yet. However just because someone is critical of the character does not mean they are sexist. Remember how universally bashed, hated, and mock Anakin Skywalker was in the prequels? Very few people liked the character especially in episode 1. There were no charges against fans of being sexist then. You can bash a male character all day long, and your not sexist. The second you say anything about a female character now all of a sudden your a sexist.

I think a the character of Rey has a lot of potential, and I like the actress that portrays her. I wan't the character to be written well. That's the complaint from the fans about this character. They don't hate her because she was a female. It's because of the writing. Do you see everyone bashing the new Wonder Woman film? No, because they created a really well thought out character.

I have defended the character of Rey in the past against charges of being a Mary Sue, but I've never accused the people I was debating of being sexist.

If you think the poster is so sexist then ask him if he has any favorite female Sci fi characters?

reply

"I don't know if Rey is a Mary Sue character, because her past hasn't been revealed yet."

It really does not matter what her past was. Even if the best case scenario; which is i think her being a fully trained jedi that had her mind wiped, she still was portrayed as a Mary Sue character. Just the way the plot revolved around her and she was shown off to "spotlight' steal from the established characters. But also being infinitely skilled and making all those around her useless. I mean she can speak droid?

"However just because someone is critical of the character does not mean they are sexist. Remember how universally bashed, hated, and mock Anakin Skywalker was in the prequels? "

Exactly. Absolutely correct.

"I think a the character of Rey has a lot of potential, and I like the actress that portrays her."

i agree she has potential but IMO the only interesting thing they can do with her is have her become evil. Arrogance because of her ease of gaining power leads her to evil. That would be good. But I got too much of a politically driven character feel to think they will do that. I did not like the actress's portrayal either. her facial expressions are totally over exaggerated in many of her scenes and she like many others in the film were way too self aware (like they couldn't hide that they had cameras on them).

"I have defended the character of Rey in the past against charges of being a Mary Sue, but I've never accused the people I was debating of being sexist."

I appreciate this approach. I mean as I understand the definition of the writing trope she is a Mary Sue almost to perfection. But I can have a reasonable disagreement with someone that has a valid counter and doesn't just scream "sexist!!!" a the first mention.

reply

"I have defended the character of Rey in the past against charges of being a Mary Sue, but I've never accused the people I was debating of being sexist."

Her abilities are derided as unrealistic because she is a female character, hence the focus on gender with "Mary Sue." In this same series, the male characters' abilities are not derided as unrealistic, even when they are 100% comparable to Rey, or even less qualified.

reply

"Her abilities are derided as unrealistic because she is a female character, "

No her abilities are derided as unrealistic because she broke the continuity of Star Wars and she has them without 'earning' them during her development as a character (because she had no development, she was complete already).

"hence the focus on gender with "Mary Sue.""

"Mary sue" is a gender neutral writing trope. sometimes if it a male character it is called Gary Stu but the meaning doesn't change. Only those that do not understand what it means and how it applies would state something like this.

"In this same series, the male characters' abilities are not derided as unrealistic,"

So you weren't around for the Anakin Skywalker bashing then?

"even when they are 100% comparable to Rey,"

Who is 100% comparable to Rey? I assume you mean Luke, they are not 100% comparable see the other 50 thousands explanations as to why.

" or even less qualified."

Given we do not even know her backstory and therefore do not know her qualification yet, how can you claim to know who is more or less qualified to rapidly obtain force powers?

reply

At this point, when people accuse others of being misogynist or racist or what have you, it has little meaning to me. It's over played to the point where you might as well start saying "Did you eat breakfast this morning? Racist! Do you wear pants! Misogynist!". It seems to be the last resort of people who actually can't defend their stances. It's an ad hominem attack with a healthy dose of a holier-than-thou attitude.

reply

Yup. you are right. I can't even add anything more.

reply

"Her abilities are derided as unrealistic because she is a female character, hence the focus on gender with "Mary Sue." In this same series, the male characters' abilities are not derided as unrealistic, even when they are 100% comparable to Rey, or even less qualified."



Okay so your saying people are bashing the character because she is female? Remember when the first trailers hit, and how excited everyone was for TFA. Nobody was pissed off about a female lead in the movie. The criticism of this character only came after they saw the movie. If it was because of sexism they would have bashed the character before they even saw the film.

Beside your argument is a straw man, because no on is saying her abilities are unrealistic because she is female. They are saying her abilities are unrealistic, because of her level of experience.

reply

The criticism of this character only came after they saw the movie. If it was because of sexism they would have bashed the character before they even saw the film.

1. There was already plenty of complaining about a female lead role in Star Wars just from the trailers.

2. No one can bash her abilities before seeing the movie.

"They are saying her abilities are unrealistic, because of her level of experience."

And I'm saying that Luke's abilities are just as unrealistic, if not moreso. He had a major lack of experience!!! HE DEFEATED VADER IN ROTJ DESPITE NEVER HAVING LIGHTSABER TRAINING!!!

I'm also saying that NO ONE YET KNOWS REY'S LEVEL OF EXPERIENCE, not even her! She has blocked memories and seems to have been at Luke's Jedi Academy!

I don't know how many more times I can repeat this shit.

reply

Well nether one of us has the ability to do a meta analysis of social media to see how many fan's were complaining about a female lead. I'm sure there were some who did complain. I'm not going to deny that it would be idiotic of me.

From what I observed on social media before the film came out was mostly positive. If there were any negative complaints it was people who were worried that the movie would have had a far left SJW tone. Which in my opinion it did not. Now there were a lot of people saying that the movie was just a feminist propaganda piece. I didn't think that it did, and I've debated people on that.

The vast amount of criticism towards Rey came after the movie was released. Max Landis did a video explaining why he thought she was a Mary Sue.

Yes I agree with you we don't know anything about her past. So we don't know why she has the abilities she does. We have to see what happens with the next film.

What I'm saying if someone doesn't like Rey, or thinks she is over powered. That does not automatically make them a sexist. If you want use evidence from star wars lore to back up your case, or whatever else. Then that makes sense. If that's your first go to is "your a sexist". It would be the same as if the other persons argument against someone liking Rey was "your just a cuck".

I liked TFA, I liked Rey, and I was entertained by the film. My friend who saw the movie with me thought they ripped off the first film, and didn't understand why Rey was so powerful. I argued that we don't know her background. I never thought my buddy was a sexist for his views.

reply

Right. As I've said numerous times in this thread, if it turns out she's Anakin reincarnated, a Force-baby, Luke's daughter, or that she was trained and had her mind-erased, or any of the other fan theories that explains why she would be abnormally powerful, I'll be fine with it, but as of right now, we just have to go by what we see onscreen.

reply

Anakin reincarnated or force baby really is not enough to be a satisfying explanation. Especially since everyone complained about Anakin being "space jesus" and were relentless on how the PT made him like a force baby. And he still needed training to use the force at an active conscious level. If they go with this explanation for Rey why would it be okay if it wasn't for Anakin?

The only explanation that would 'work' plot wise is the she was trained and had her memory erased explanation, but even that will feel tacky as hell. like it got added on as a footnote type deal. This explanation I find to be too similar to the "and it was all a dream" cliche.

Really I can't imagine a scenario in which I would be satisfied with Rey as a character. She is just set up too bad in her opening film.

reply

There are some event in the old EU of Star Wars books were force sensitives were able to tap into the force with some force training, or non at all.

Darth Bane unknowingly tapped into the dark side, and gave his abusive father a heart attack. Also in the same story a young force sensitive girl who was a child. Was angered by two Jedi knights who killed these aliens called the Laa thinking they were going to kill the girl.

She was so upset that she caused a surge in the darkside of the force. Then used it to snap the two necks of the Jedi Knights. Darth Bane was so impressed with her. He decided to make her his apprentice, and she became Darth Zannah.

reply

I am not sure what this has to do with anything. I am a big supporter of the idea the only the movies matter for the continuity. If things in the EU broke continuity it does not really matter to me. I am not sure how others felt about it. But TFA was an actually episode movie that broke the continuity in similar manner to that which gave examples from the EU and IMO opinion those EU stories would have been just as bad as the movie; at least basing that off your description.

reply

Well this story is no longer a part of Star Wars continuity since Disney bought it. I'm just trying to find other examples of force sensitives have a sudden surge of force powers with no training. To somehow justify what Rey was able to do with no training.

I know the real behind the scenes reason why. It's because JJ Abrams took so much heat with how he portrayed his female characters in Star Trek that he over compensated with Rey.

I'm not super well versed in star wars EU, but I've read some books, and comics. Which has some really popular female characters which the fans never bitched about. Like Mara Jade, Ahsoka Tano, Nomi Sunrider...etc. Just to highlight Star Wars fans are not sexist. I know you don't think that, but some do.

reply

"To somehow justify what Rey was able to do with no training."

Yeah they are obviously going to try to find some way to justify it; but even if they do somehow come up with a god reason I really can't see how it won't feel tacky.

"I know the real behind the scenes reason why. It's because JJ Abrams took so much heat with how he portrayed his female characters in Star Trek that he over compensated with Rey."

It wasn't just him; Disney obviously has a focus on redefining the classical princess archetype. Look at the last 10 years of films for proof of that. In addition Kathleen Kennedy obviously pushed for the powerful female lead too, look at her interviews about what she thinks of the male star wars fans for proof, and as you said JJ is a leftist hack director that was overcompensating for his poor choices in Star Trek Into Darkness. And it looks like it is only getting worse; now they are likely going to try to push openly gay characters into Star Wars. Why or why George did you have to sell to Disney?

"Which has some really popular female characters which the fans never bitched about. Like Mara Jade, Ahsoka Tano, Nomi Sunrider...etc. Just to highlight Star Wars fans are not sexist. I know you don't think that, but some do."

I know the games had some of the best female characters in Star Wars. I am not well read in the book but the jedi knight series and KOTOR series had Bastilla Shan, Kreia, and on and on. Great characters all. and lets us not forget the original, princess Leia. But I get annoyed by how overpowered and under developed Rey is and somehow that makes me sexist. I think the third wave feminist are overcompensating as much as JJ. It is a shame that modern politics got into star wars, and in such a unsubtle manner.

reply

You do realise that the term 'Mary Sue' is gender neutral don't you?

reply

Only if you're a girl.

reply

Jesus effing space christ. Find an oven to shove year head in. If you can dislodge it from your own butt for a moment, that is.

reply

[deleted]

Says a guy angry about a movie he hasn't seen.

reply

[deleted]

none of what you said is true and none of this will go the way you think.

reply

[deleted]

I really like the idea of Leia dying in this one. I hope Kylo really does kill her.

reply

[deleted]

No, I mean I like it as a plot device. Han dies in 7, Leia dies in 8 and Luke dies in 9. They should have gone this direction from day 1.

reply

[deleted]

One of the original three actors literally died in real life just last year. The writers should have been prepared for this by killing off her character in 8. It's not about what the fans want, it's about the writers not having egg on their face when an actress (who was obviously in poor health) dies and they can't use her in the following film.

reply

[deleted]

1. Overweight 2. Obviously a smoker 3. A history of drugs 5. Bipolar 6. Wheezing all the time 7. Had to have a dog with her everywhere she went, which is a dead ringer that she had health problems. In hindsight, it should have been obvious that Fisher would be the first of the three to go.

reply

[deleted]

You usually don't carry your French bulldog everywhere you go, including to interviews, unless it's a health service dog. Also, Carrie Fisher had drugs in her system when she died. And no, I'm not a doctor. You don't have to be a doctor to tell when someone is clearly unhealthy.

reply

[deleted]

Carrie Fisher, came to the comic con that was in my town last year. I bumped into her has I was browsing the place. She was surrounded by a bunch of security guys, and she had her dog with her.

Carrie Fisher had a long history of mental health, and drug related problems. So I'm not surprised she was the first to go.

reply

[deleted]

I meant from the main three human characters. I wasn't talking about the droids or Chewbacca.

reply

[deleted]

Alright, I don't care if you like to joke/pull other people's legs. I just meant the actors that play the main human characters. Also, Kenny Baker was recast, which is something you can easily do with R2, but not with Leia. That's a big difference.

reply

[deleted]

Oh yes I forgot about him.

reply

ALL of these movie will just be copies of copies... That's what sells... That's what the fans want...

They figured out the formula... It works... And no, I'm not going to watch this...

reply

[deleted]

;)

reply

i am so happy we have this moviechat site now i missed good commentary like this, good job OP

reply

[deleted]