The Luke complaints are not valid


The Mandalorian brought back a major complaint about this movie: Luke Skywalker. Men crying because they got to see Luke in his prime. "That is my Luke." Hogwash. ROTJ Luke is the worst Luke of them all.

For starters, NO ONE is the exactly the same person throughout their life. People change, then change again. Sometimes they are variations of the same personality type, sometimes they do a 180; then a 180 back to who they were years ago. Expecting him to be the same guy as he was when he's in his 20s is absurd.

Don't get me wrong, it was mildly cool seeing Luke stroll up in his X-Wing and show his power, but it was also extremely cliche too. He's walking around swinging his saber against insurmountable odds (dozens of enemies). It was a classic "more/bigger is better" situation. Totally cliche. Nothing special about it.

I liked it to an extent, but I also had no problem with his display of power in TLJ. I actually liked that quite a bit. It was a huge display of power and different. It was new. Unique. Not standard. He did something no one ever did (on screen) before. It wasn't the typical swinging of the lightsaber against hordes of opponents either, mowing them down with easy. That's lazy. Typical. Expected. And kind of anti-climatic.

That being said, the action was the only part I liked about his appearance in Mando. I don't like Luke's personality from that era. I never have. ROTJ Luke sucks. He was my faorite character growing up, but he has ALWAYS bothered me in ROTJ. He has no personality. He's Mace Windu-level wooden.He's not interesting because he's too busy walking around brooding and acting like he HAS TO act like he has no personality. His obsession with "saving" Vader is also a huge turnoff. People complained about him in TLJ, but I liked him much more than ROTJ Luke. He had a personality. Luke from ANH, TESB has personality too. He showed emotion. He got angry or happy. He smiled, yelled, and acted like a normal human. ROTJ Luke does not. Mando brought back that bland Luke and I don't like it.

Not to mention, Mark Hamill is damn near 70. They are not going to show him flipping and jumping like a kid. Do you want more stuff like CGI Christopher Lee jumping? Because I don't and that's what it would require to make a near 70year old man do these things.

reply

You prefer Disney Star Wars over all other types of Star Wars. Your opinion SUCKS and is NOT VALID.

reply

Well, that's a lie. Not surprising considering your a Lucas cultist.

reply

You'll be saying next that Disney IMPROVED Star Wars! HAHAHA! (whatacrockofshit)

reply

Did you vote for Trump by any chance? Because you seem to have a penchant for making things up.

reply

I despise Trump, and I'm not American.

That's two assumptions you made about me blown out of the water.

reply

"That's two assumptions you made about me"

You mean like these?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You prefer Disney Star Wars over all other types of Star Wars.

You'll be saying next that Disney IMPROVED Star Wars! HAHAHA!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

reply

What exactly is a “Lucas cultist” ?I’m guessing it’s just anyone who doesn’t line the Disney films , also your comment about Trump is comical irony considering lying is just about all the left does.

reply

No, you're allowed to dislike the sequels. That isn't the issue. iI myself don't like the entire series. People who say things like:

You prefer Disney Star Wars over all other types of Star Wars. Your opinion SUCKS and is NOT VALID."

are Lucas Loyalists. He doesn't say "sequels" or "sequel trilogy", but "dIsNeY stAr WArs!"

People who only like "the real Star Wars" and obsess over hating the sequel trilogy. People who say things like insisting their opinion is shared by everyone. People who take their obsession with hating these movies and are delusional and insist everyone feels that way: https://moviechat.org/tt2527338/Star-Wars-The-Rise-Of-Skywalker/60a2b6bec491e251bf3ee2b7/Maybe-Star-Wars-is-dead-for-people-born-in-the-1970s

reply

I don’t know of anyone who says your opinion isn’t valid if you like Di$ney Star Wars, all you’re doing is framing people who disagree with you as irrational so that you have an excuse to not have to defend your opinion. It’s kind of cowardly on your part.

reply

*you're*

reply

You're taking about a fictional character dude. His appearance in TLJ was a disappointment cause it was written poorly. So were VII and IX.

reply

"You're taking about a fictional character dude."

I mean, you are on a movie message board.......

reply

He could've been so much better. His first Star Wars appearance in decades and what does he do? He throws the lightsaber over his shoulder and goes and drinks some blue milk. So stupid!

reply

Wait, are YOU talking about a fictional character?

I'm gonna need you to expand on that opinion a little. You are mad because he threw a lightsaber? I'm gonna need more than that.

reply

Not what you wanted I guess. But that doesn't make it bad writing.

reply

I agree with you that that is essentially why people didn't like it but it can go either way. I'm currently having conversations about the video game The Last of Us 2. MANY people were unhappy because the story was not what they wanted AT ALL and I think it's a very valid complaint

But with Luke, I completely and totally agree with you. And it's proven by all the Mando praise. The main talking point for Mando Luke was we got to see him "at his full power." Well he's nearly fucking 70, we were never going to see Mark Hamill flipping and mowing down dozens of enemies, which is 1 of the several reasons I think the complaint about Luke has no merit.

reply

Nobody says you can't complain about not getting what you want.

But that doesn't mean it's bad writing.

reply

it was mildly cool seeing Luke stroll up in his X-Wing

That line alone tells us that your opinion is to be ignored.

The significance of that scene cannot be understated.

Mando brought back that bland Luke and I don't like it

Becasue he is now a full blown Jedi Master. Jedi is akin to shaolin monks, Knights Templar. Jedi are not meant to show and feel emotion as that could lead you to the dark side. Did you even watch the films?

Your entire rant shows you know very little and more importantly are not bothered which then begs the question "why the rant in the first place". You will never get any Star Wars fan on your side when you use your opening sentence.

reply

The word rant doesn't mean what you think it does. This is is a message board, fella. People talk about things here. One might even say that's the purpose of the site.

'That line alone tells us that your opinion is to be ignored.

The significance of that scene cannot be understated."

Boy, there's a strong point. I couldn't counter that if I wanted to. I could never counter an argument that's as airtight as this and is essentially, "You are wrong." You really got me, chief.

"Did you even watch the films?"

Did YOU? Obi Wan (both versions) has no personality? Qui Gon? Shit, Yoda outright fucks with Luke when he first meets him - and it's hilarious. Sit down, sir.

reply

triplea's post, now there's a rant.

reply

Jedi are not meant to show and feel emotion as that could lead you to the dark side.


What complete nonsense. You're confusing Jedi with Vulcans.

reply

It's only of significance to fans who want to pretend it's both 1984 and the early 2000s so they can indulge their fantasy of a ROTJ era Luke action figure effortlessly swishing his saber through a bunch of droids like it was a prequel movie.

reply

I absolutely LOVE that OT style Luke in the Mandalorian is so triggering to these losers lol.

OT > ST

And Rey is a Mary Sue 😂

reply

What in God's name are you talking about, LOL?!

reply

I completely agree with everything you said. The OT wipes its ass with the ST and Rey is the biggest Mary Sue in cinematic history. I have a feeling that she represents how Kathleen Kennedy wishes the world viewed her.

reply


Your complaint about his "wooden-ness" is valid and a result of the actor being told to play an advanced mystic. That is not a fault of the character or the actor, but a flaw in the concept of the Jedi.


Beyond that, I think you are missing what people did not like about TLJ Luke. It was not really the lack of action, or even that he was not the same person he was the last time they saw him, but that the person he had become, had INVALIDATED the stories of the first three movies.

All that effort at learning? All that sacrifice and heroics? All those people that died fighting the Empire? What did it lead to?

Slowing down the New Order 15 minutes so the rebels could slip out the back and we are RIGHT back where we started in the OG trilogy, with one Jedi on the run with a rag tag batch of rebels.

IF, Luke said that he had been sitting on that island waiting for the Force to bring him the next generation of Jedi to train, instead of wallowing in pity, and they had a nice training montage and he took the Alec Gunness/Obi Wan Kenobi role in that film, I think most fans would have been fine with that.

reply

I am working on a response to this, but moviechat seems to be limiting how long it can be. I'll respond when I figure it out.

reply

I am off to work in moments. I will read it tonight and respond.

reply

Holy shit, a person that wants to have a conversation?! THANK YOU for not being a dingus like 95% of the other responders. An actual fucking grown up, thank you Jesus!
"Your complaint about his "wooden-ness" is valid and a result of the actor being told to play an advanced mystic. That is not a fault of the character or the actor, but a flaw in the concept of the Jedi."
There's plenty of Jedi who were shown to have a personality. Anakin, Obi Wan, Qui Gon, Yoda. Luke is from the Mace Windu school of no emotion and no personality. Even just looking at Luke's trilogy, you seem examples of it from Obi Wan and Yoda that you don't HAVE TO BE wooden. Between that and the obsession with saving Vader, Luke frustrates the fuck out of me and I say that as someone who has always considered ROTJ as a "favorite" in the series.
"Beyond that, I think you are missing what people did not like about TLJ Luke. It was not really the lack of action, or even that he was not the same person he was the last time they saw him, but that the person he had become, had INVALIDATED the stories of the first three movies.
All that effort at learning? All that sacrifice and heroics? All those people that died fighting the Empire? What did it lead to?
Slowing down the New Order 15 minutes so the rebels could slip out the back and we are RIGHT back where we started in the OG trilogy, with one Jedi on the run with a rag tag batch of rebels."
It wasn't a complaint of a lack of action. Really, now? Bro, they cheered specifically BECAUSE OF the action in Mando. THIS is the scene that was "their Luke" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOl55h1HcZE.
You’re muddying the waters a bit. You are combining two separate issues. I'm talking about LUKE and the complaints about HIM, not the trilogy overall. Luke's personality in this series has nothing to do with the Empire coming back; and negating the OT. That's a separate issue from Luke's personality, which is ALLOWED to change btw.

reply

People are allowed to change, disappoint you, get scared, fail at something, etc. You were NEVER going to get 1983 Luke because it isn’t 1983 anymore. The character changed a TON from ANH to ROTJ, but you want Mando Luke 34 years later? Come. On. This is not a valid criticism.
I wouldn’t use the word invalidated, but is The New Order a repeat of The Empire? Sure. Is Starkiller base and Star Destroyers with the power of The Death Star just a variation of The Death Star? I can agree with that too. But that’s what this series is. I don’t know why, but it’s obsessed with certain themes, tropes, or whatever. Planet killing weapons, bad guys that shouldn’t be redeemed -the series is loaded with stuff like this. Books, comics, games, this stuff has all repeated several times over the years. Sometimes it works, others it’s insanely frustrating.

“IF, Luke said that he had been sitting on that island waiting for the Force to bring him the next generation of Jedi to train, instead of wallowing in pity, and they had a nice training montage and he took the Alec Gunness/Obi Wan Kenobi role in that film, I think most fans would have been fine with that.”
Obi Wan and Yoda literally ran and hid for decades. Yoda never emerged again and Obi Wan only popped up when Leia begged him. They weren’t secretly working with the Rebellion or planning some kind of comeback, they RAN and HID.

reply

THANK YOU for not being a dingus like 95% of the other responders. An actual fucking grown up, thank you Jesus!


Well, with that hot-take OP telling people that their complaints are invalid, it turns a lot of them off. You wanna have a conversation? Don't start with telling others that their criticisms don't count. And if you're gonna claim to like Luke, then try sympathizing with other Luke fans instead of insulting them because they don't like his portrayal in TLJ.
Based on other posts you've made so far, not only do you seem to misunderstand why people don't like Luke's portrayal in The Last Jedi, but you also seem to misunderstand Luke himself, despite claiming you like him.

Luke's character in TLJ doesn't fit his arc in the OT, and saying people change as they get older doesn't justify the 180 turn his character took. People change as they age, yes, but when telling a story, the change has to make sense based on established character traits. Luke changed with each movie in a way that made sense, and he continued to change further in the Legends EU in a way that made sense. The fans loved Luke in the EU even though he made some naive and stupid decisions, because his character was otherwise respected. In TLJ, he was disrespected in order to make Rey look good, and that clearly backfired with most fans. The Mandolorian gave the fans exactly what they wanted: respect for Luke's character. You may not have liked Luke's characterization specifically in ROTJ and that's fine, but most fans do and that's something you'll have to accept as a Luke fan. It’s not just ROTJ Luke that people wanted to see though, it’s respect for Luke, and growth that makes sense for his character.

Writers don't have to downgrade an established character just to make new characters look good. Again, look at the Legends EU, there's a reason fans like Jaina Solo over Rey Palpa-walker. There's a reason fans love Grandmaster Luke Skywalker over Disney's hollow replica that even Mark Hamill himself despised.

reply

Are you saying all opinions are valid? That there's no baseless opinions in this world? It's not a hot take. You're just calling it a hot take because you don't like it, because if it was a hot take, it wouldn't have any length to it. Hot takes are trolling. Hot takes are meant to simply piss people off. You might not like my opinion, but I took time and effort into making that post. These are hot takes:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You prefer Disney Star Wars over all other types of Star Wars. Your opinion SUCKS and is NOT VALID.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I absolutely LOVE that OT style Luke in the Mandalorian is so triggering to these losers lol.

OT > ST

And Rey is a Mary Sue 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It DOES make sense based on established character traits though. Luke is an extremely emotional guy outside of ROTJ. He gets excited, is hopeful to the point of it being naive, gets angry and will act defeated easily - it's all right there on the OT. Luke HAS emotions. So much so, some fans call him whiny. It's a part of who he is - and Yoda makes sure to tell him how much of a failure he is every time he shows any personality. There is absolutely a precedent for Luke being defeated; and after his nephew goes mass murderer, no less.

reply

I never said there are no baseless opinions in this world, I *did* say that “baseless” doesn’t apply to the criticisms for Luke in TLJ. Many people have given perfectly valid reasons on why Luke was mishandled in TLJ. You’re just calling them invalid because you don’t like them.

There’s no word limit on how long or short a hot take can be. I’ve seen whole articles from activists claiming Luke and Anakin are Mary Sues, written out of spite because fans dared to call out Rey for what she is.
If you really didn’t intend to piss anyone off, then I suggest editing your title to something less provocative.

“Fans call him whiny.”
Ok, and? He acted that way at first, but he changed. You yourself said people change, it’s called growth and maturity. He was humbled after his fight with Vader in “Empire” and he came out wiser for it, that’s why he’s not acting nearly as emotional in “Jedi” and even then, he still got pissed when Vader threatened to turn Leia. Again, it seems like you don’t understand Luke’s character, or character development for that matter. This misunderstanding also applies to your post on Captain America and Iron Man in “Civil War”. You somehow managed to flip their alignment. If you’re really not trolling, then you definitely need to look into all these characters more since you don’t know what you’re talking about.

reply

"Many people have given perfectly valid reasons on why Luke was mishandled in TLJ. "

Super strong arguments here. Really deep stuff.

"You prefer Disney Star Wars over all other types of Star Wars. Your opinion SUCKS and is NOT VALID."

"he was a moody bitch"

"Not a broody dickhead but a wise tutor with a final score to settle."

"Ok, and? He acted that way at first, but he changed. You yourself said people change, it’s called “growth”, “maturity”. He was humbled after his fight with Vader in Empire and he came out wider for it, that’s why he’s not acting nearly as emotional in Jedi, and even then, he still got pissed when Vader threatened to turn Leia. Again, it seems like you don’t understand Luke’s character, or character development for that matter. "

So Luke changed from ANH to ROTJ - and you cite his encounter with Vader as a reason for it - but not only can he not change in the 34 years since ROTJ and definitely not from his encounter with his nephew. You know this is BLATANT hypocrisy, right?

reply

“ Super strong arguments here. Really deep stuff.”

What did you expect? When you make a hot-take post, you’ll get replies like that.

“You know this is BLATANT hypocrisy, right?”

Like the blatant hypocrisy when you said you didn’t like him in ROTJ, even after saying people change?
I never said people don’t, can’t, or shouldn’t change. I said a character’s change needs to make sense based on established traits. The Legends writers understood that, the Disney writers did not.

reply

You don't know what a hot take actually means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hot take
Learn to pronounce
nounUS
noun: hot take; plural noun: hot takes; noun: hottake; plural noun: hottakes

a piece of commentary, typically produced quickly in response to a recent event, whose primary purpose is to attract attention.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I specifically came to this obscure website - which isn't the busiest of places - for a 4 year old movie to start an argument. No possible way I came to talk about one of my favorite franchises. Good call. You're only calling it a hot take because you don't like the opinion and can't intelligently discuss it.

I never said you or anyone else had to like Luke BECAUSE he changed. What I did say is that the reasons people disliked him are pretty baseless; and based previous portrayal, there's a precedent for his behavior. I would say "good try", but it really wasn't.

reply

Except You literally came here to start an argument 😄 You should look up “self-awareness” and “projection” while you’re at it.

Try better next time.

reply

Oh, did I? You know this and knowingly responded to my comment?

reply

but that the person he had become, had INVALIDATED the stories of the first three movies.


Poppycock. He wasn't wallowing. He thought what he was doing was right. His judgement was clouded by shame at his failure and fear of repeated failure, sure.

That doesn't invalidate shit. Just because you were a hotshot in your early twenties doesn't mean you should behave like in reaction to a tragedy involving a child in your family, like your son or your nephew. Especially when there are galaxy affecting consequences.

Luke was there for two years in anguish at what had happened and how he could avoid making things worse. And then he responds after a day of persuasion and guilt tripping. Yoda sat on his as for twenty years for the sole purpose of waiting for the right time to train the boy (according to the prequels) then when Luke arrives he tells him he's too old and refuses to train him. The prequels INVALIDATED Yoda's reluctance to train Luke by telling us that the reason Yoda hid away and helped nobody was expressly so he would train Luke at the right time.

reply

He WAS wallowing, but that's ok. People are allowed to wallow. He's human, unlike that robot in ROTJ.

The prequels didn't invalidate anything. The OT is what counts. If Lucas created a plot hole - and he created many - in one of his prequels, that's on him. Nothing in the OT is overwritten or ruined, it's his shitty prequels that are at fault.

reply

Luke wasn't indulging in self pity. He was aghast at how things panned out. He was punishing himself and protecting everyone else from him, he thought.

The PT was created after the OT and it has Yoda stating motivations and intentions that are expressly at odds with his stated policies and values on the OT. The PT therefore validates what Yoda said in the OT. (Or the OT invalidates the PT if you like to delude yourself that they were all conceived in sequence if not released that way).

It's not like we're talking about Luke not doing what some people thought and assumed they would see, because that's all they wanted. We're talking about a character who's stated outlook and intent are different from one trilogy to the next without any accounting for their change of heart in between. That's Yoda between Episode III and Episode V.

reply

I didnt mind Luke in ROTJ, he had grown from Farm Boy to Jedi Learner in Empire ,by the time we get to ROTJ hes ready to become a Jedi and matured.

reply

The only time I liked Luke in ROTJ was this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZ_j3s5xj8I. I don't think he's a bad person, I just don't like the monk stuff. And saving Vader is fucking ridiculous. I hate that that moment has become such a staple in the franchise that every big bad (except Palpatine) has to be saved now.

reply

I think this portrayal of Luke is the problem. Out of character and moody just didn’t work for fans who were waiting years to see their hero.

Unfortunately they took him in the wrong direction.

You mentioned his age as a challenge and yes I agree we wouldn’t want to see him flipping around. He is older and fatter. But there’s many examples of what could have been done with him as an older warrior.

Sean Connery is badass in The Rock for example and Liam Neeson did a great job on the first Taken movie and there’s many more examples.

Show him as the wisened old hero with one last wrong to right. Make his role a positive in Daisy’s development and let us see what benefit he would be to a depleted Resistance.

When all of that falls into place we now able to setup a final stand for Luke and we feel his sacrifice a lot more because of the journey he was on throughout the movie. Not a broody dickhead but a wise tutor with a final score to settle.

reply

"I think this portrayal of Luke is the problem. Out of character and moody just didn’t work for fans who were waiting years to see their hero."

He was called whiny for decades because he showed emotions. Luke IS emotional. ANH, TESB, TLJ, TROS - THIS is who he is, not that robot in ROTJ and Mando.TLJ was a return to form. Luke has ALWAYS been an emotional guy.

"Show him as the wisened old hero with one last wrong to right. Make his role a positive in Daisy’s development and let us see what benefit he would be to a depleted Resistance."

Like killing himself so the Resistence could escape?

reply

He was moody or stressed under duress but he had lighter times. Like with the droids etc.. on the moisture farm he was so hopeful of bigger things. Problem is we mostly see him during stressful times. So they could have given us more stress free Luke during the downtime, kinda like Yoda became on degobah.

Yes he sacrificed himself but he was a moody bitch all the way up to then. Would have been amazing if he was actually likable when he went out and not from afar but right there in the trenches with them.

reply

So he can be moody in ANH and TESB, but not TLJ? You know that's what you said, right?

reply

Or like this movie, he can be emo as hell.

Why not more positive if you gonna change the character anyway.

You can’t tell me this is the same Luke from the OT?

reply

Luke is "emo as hell" in TLJ? Get real.

And what do you mean "the same Luke from the OT" ? The same as a boy who hasn't yet lived another 30-40 years, a whole other lifetime or two, of consequence?

reply

He literally flipped a light saber over his shoulder and drank blue milk straight from a titty. He’s emo.

All I’m saying is from all the directions they could have gone with him, they chose this.

It’s understandable that the fans would be upset.

reply

You clearly don't know what emo means and are just using it to describe what you don't want or like.

Too bad for the fans that couldn't let them tell the story instead of pandering to them.

reply

"Or like this movie, he can be emo as hell."

You mean, like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X66jntR0MVE&feature=emb_logo

"Why not more positive if you gonna change the character anyway."

Why does he have to be positive? His nephew, who he trained, is a mass murderer. Would you be "positive" about that?

"You can’t tell me this is the same Luke from the OT?"

Well he's like 50 years older, soooo....

reply

Y’all fellas too salty with this emo Luke.

I wonder what direction JJ thought up for him at the end of Force Awakens.

Unfortunately this movie sucked and that’s not even my opinion.

My opinion, a better Luke moment saves this movie (as proven by Mandalorian recently.)

reply

Luke is allowed to be emotional, just not in the sequels. That's your argument and yeah, I'm gonna say that has no merit.

I have no idea what JJ intended, butit was pretty obvious Johnson did whatever he wanted.

reply

"Men crying because they got to see Luke in his prime "...interesting, did you see them crying?
Correct or wrong the sentence was: " This is my Luke "

reply

They are just butthurt because people liked the Mandalorian more than the ST 🤣.

reply