Chore to watch


The hand held camera/POV/Docu style of filming in low budget horror has been bled to death. When the story picked up, I ignored it but the ending went down hill. It was The Blair Witch meets The Sentinel (77).

The only quality I liked was the talisman deer skull scarecrows were cool looking...and Sarah Jones' tits were heart warming as well.

Film is really a 2/10 but Sarah Jones being hot makes it a 3/10.



www.thecultofhorror.blogspot.com

reply

Oh no not another static camera movie.

’’I'M A  ‘‘

reply

I actually though it was pretty solid for a "found footage" type of movie. Not a high bar I know, but I personally have always had a fondness for the sub-genre. I get that it's a real love it or hate it approach though. I like how it gets you into the reality of the film, dislike that it is, as you say a method far too frequently employed by the underfunded and the talentless. I digress.

This movie was fairly inexpert at times, and the end could have used a rework, but it had pretty good production value, parts of it were pretty interesting, the atmosphere was solid, and the acting done by the two mains was serviceable. Also, thankfully, for the first time in what seems a million of these movies the person holding the camera wasn't an interminably obnoxious twit

Sara Jones I agree is nice to look at. For whatever reason (cause who is really that impacted by boobs on screen anymore?) when she had her first full body shot I was like (a bit shamefully) "whoa boobs!".

reply

T

reply