MovieChat Forums > Last Knights (2015) Discussion > This movie is garbage, it was bot-rated.

This movie is garbage, it was bot-rated.


*beep* b-movie, clive and morgan BOTH should be ashamed of this steaming load of crap. I hate that youtube fan made movies have better acting and writing than hollywood these days (cough-streetfighter assasin's fist-cough).

reply

You have no idea what you are talking about.

reply

It has an interesting plot which took some deep undercover planning, it was entertaining.

reply

Its good, ignore this person.

reply

WHAT?!?! It's PURE GARBAGE! For the love of all that's holy, freaking Freeman couldn't even be bothered to fake a terrible british accent for the few mins he was actually in the movie?! Nothing about this was good, at all. The sets were garbage, the script was garbage, if there HAD BEEN ACTING IT WOULD HAVE BEEN GARBAGE! This is not even worth this posting, I'm done.

reply

It seems to me that you talk garbage.

"excuse me... who are you?"

reply

by effingwewt

Freeman couldn't even be bothered to fake a terrible british accent


LOL! What does that have to do with anything? WHY would he need a fake British accent? The movie was not set in medieval England. None of the other non-UK actors had British accents, which was a majority of the cast.

It seems you had some pre-conceived expectations and assumptions about this film. When they weren't met, you were disappointed. That is not the film's fault, it's yours.

This was a standard medieval/fantasy flick. For people who like these kinds of movies, it was pretty decent. But if you're looking for something special or different, look else where. This genre has been done to death. You're not going to get anything mind-blowing from a low-budget, direct-to-video movie.

And, coming to IMDb and ranting about it, isn't make a difference.


Wolf



"I Drank What?!" - Socrates

reply

Also, it's QUICKLY fallen from a 7.8 to a 6.2, so MANY people agree, and mark my words it'll be a 4-5 movie AT BEST. It's garbage.

reply

This kid is wrong. Was a good budget film and decent acting.

reply

acting was average at best, everyone was just bored, even Freeman didn't bother to stick around for more than 30 minutes, so was i, can't believe how great Clive has fallen after his performance in The Knick.
Waste of time and money.

reply

Movie was terrible. Not wrong about that.

reply

Riiiiiiiight, which is why it has a 27/100 metascore right? That's the DEFINITION of a flop. I have a feeling you shills worked on this piece of absolute crap, cuz everyone with an actual brain can see this for the garbage it IS!

reply

Great movie, one of the better surprises so far this year. Succesful blend of various genres - medieval/fantasy adventure, men on a mission, vigilante and heist movie. Good buildup with a satisfying payoff, some beautiful scenery.

Critics panning this movie with a 27/100 just goes to show many critics are more into boring elitist arthouse crap or movies with a liberal message or whatever. Who gives a sh*t about the critics. This movie was meant to entertain and it did a fine job at that.

reply

A low critic rating is not the definition of a flop... that has nothing to do with it. A "flop" only refers to how much money it made.

Transformers 4 was critically shamed, but FAR from a flop.

Jus' sayin'



World War 2 Movie timeline - The List!

http://www.imdb.com/list/UKAt1E8ul88/

reply

I agree. Although I cannot comment on the whole of the movie, had to turn it off about a third into the movie. What is Morgan and Clive doing!!??

reply

Quiet down troll. Stick with Disney movies. You obviously don't have the capability to decipher a a good movie from a bad one.

reply

you are a retard, go die you idiot

reply