the 'shaky camera' crap is really getting annoying in so many films these days ... i blame 'cloverfield' tho i blame that movie for lots of stuff lol ...
but it's supposed to make it look 'real' i suppose ... as if you are on foot and running/trotting after the principals in the movie so you feel as if 'you are there' ... frankly what it makes me feel like is a bit car sick (esp with movies on a big imax screen where you are almost surrounded by the picture ... it's gets to be a bit much) ... esp in a documentary like this, i find the shaky-pic very irritating since it is a documentary, a film that is something of an historical record or historical retelling of an important event ... so why do they need such a 'hip' style of flming? it sinply distracts from the facts being presented for my money ... when it's used in most feature films i think it's equally distracting ... there are places and times when it is very effective of course but much like 'sun flare' is another over-used and beaten-like-a-dead-horse effect that is used as much or more (if that's possible) that the shaky-cam effect these days ... it's very annoying when 5 out of 6 films you see is using it every chance they get ...
and again, in a documentary, for me it's even more annoying ... i don't mean to say documentaries are supposed to be stodgy, old-fashioned, and visually boring (like so many of us saw in school in the 60s and 70s) but there's a limit to when the information being passed along gets smothered by the 'fancy ideas' of the film producers ...
cormac zoso
"Can you hear me??!!"
-- J. Depp as HST
reply
share