I have noticed that almost every single person who gave this film 1 star, and wrote a bad review, all admit to not actually watching the whole film! You all say "I watched it for 20 minutes..." So, how the hell can you give a film ANY review, good or bad, without having actually watched the movie?
If you accidentally put a turd in your mouth, you don't have to chew, swallow, fully digest it, crap it out taste it again to know it is bad. This movie certainly didn't get better after 20 minutes, the style was the only thing it had going for it, which isn't saying much, but it could have been worse
I have a rule and that is that i have to watch a film to the end no matter what. I watched this all the way through. Yes, it was painful and made me question the sanity of my rule. The movie doesn't get any better after the first 20 minutes. When that guy Carl was praying to God for strength, so was i!
by timlin-4 » 4 days ago (Tue Nov 5 2013 16:56:15) Flag ▼ | Reply | IMDb member since May 2007 If you accidentally put a turd in your mouth, you don't have to chew, swallow, fully digest it, crap it out taste it again to know it is bad. This movie certainly didn't get better after 20 minutes, the style was the only thing it had going for it, which isn't saying much, but it could have been worse
by fibreoptic » 3 days ago (Wed Nov 6 2013 22:12:59) IMDb member since January 2004 I have a rule and that is that i have to watch a film to the end no matter what. I watched this all the way through. Yes, it was painful and made me question the sanity of my rule. The movie doesn't get any better after the first 20 minutes. When that guy Carl was praying to God for strength, so was i!
Thanks for confirming it doesn't get any better. I knew it wouldn't.