Dreadful


How on earth this 'director' managed to turn a fascinating true story into a second rate Austen-esque melodrama is a puzzle. This film should have been brutal and moving - it should have been about slavery, racism, class and a real examination of the extent to which wealth could blur the colour line of 18th century England. Instead what we got was nothing short of a grossly sentimental episode of Downton Abbey with a biracial lead actress. Clearly the filmmaker thought the novelty of a coloured actress in a period drama would be enough and a decent script, competent direction or acting was entirely secondary.

For such a drudgingly slow paced film, the director is very heavy handed and shows us only glimpses of the abolition movement and most crucially she rushes through the 'romances' with these uncharismatic men who we never quite come to understand when, why or how she fell for them. Without the audience being convinced of this love, the film fails as both a historical drama and romantic drama. It is quite simply one of the worst directorial jobs ive seen in a while.

The actors are mostly fine. Gugu as the lead does her best, though I was not at all convinced by her genuine ambivalence for the two men. The scene where she claws at her own skin colour was poignant and possibly the most memorable.

The man she falls in love is played by an actor who looks constipated throughout the entire film. He displays no charm in either looks or voice and it is a puzzle as to why she would have fallen for this man. The older cast are solid, though Penelope Wilton is incredibly funny and steals the scenes shes in.

Intriguing topic, decent acting, dreadful movie. Avoid.

reply

Alas, you're absolutely right.

reply


This was never meant to be 12 Years a Slave.

Slaves had miserable lives. That said some had much worse lives than others - See 12 Years a Slave.

Belle is not a slave and we are watching society through her eyes. Some people seem to overlook the fact that the movie is a personal story. Are you honestly complaining that the movie is not brutal enough?

As for the romances, Twilight this is not and was never meant to be

reply

it should have been about slavery, racism, class and a real examination of the extent to which wealth could blur the colour line of 18th century England


The film is about these things. Belle being perceived as too high in status to be subservient yet too low in race to eat at her own dinner table highlights a complex and thought-provoking absurdity which is explored in reasonable depth. Meanwhile, romance story is the mirror against which the outcome of the Zong trial is reflected. The film overall is a pretty blunt instrument but as a mainstream humanist-feminist-libertarian tale it's perfectly effective.


www.fosk.weebly.com
www.rocknreelreviews.com/reviewed_by/rupert

reply

'humanist-feminist-libertarian tale'

And thats where i end the discussion.

reply

And thats where i end the discussion.


Fair enough...


www.fosk.weebly.com
www.rocknreelreviews.com/reviewed_by/rupert

reply

Actually, that's where you should begin it. BTW, those who wish the film had been a British "Mandingo" should bear in mind that it is a true story.

reply

it should have been about slavery, racism, class and a real examination of the extent to which wealth could blur the colour line of 18th century England.


That was basically the whole movie. Were you wanting to see some negro getting whipped or something?

reply

That was basically the whole movie. Were you wanting to see some negro getting whipped or something?


Well said.

reply

[deleted]

The man she falls in love is played by an actor who looks constipated throughout the entire film. He displays no charm in either looks or voice and it is a puzzle as to why she would have fallen for this man. The older cast are solid, though Penelope Wilton is incredibly funny and steals the scenes shes in.


I agree that the actor, Sam Reid, was quite wooden throughout his performance as John Davinier. I was surprised when I looked him up through IMDB how handsome he is--this didn't come through in the film.

As to why Dido would fall for him in the film, I would guess because he was passionate in his desire to end the slave trade in England. I could believe her being drawn to his strength and conviction. He also spoke to her like an equal and inspired her to learn more about the Zong case and to confront her great-uncle, the Earl of Mansfield.

I liked the older cast too, especially Tom Wilkinson. I don't think it was a 'dreadful' film, but it certainly could have been better (less clichéd).







And all the pieces matter (The Wire)

reply

Look, maybe it wasn't supposed to be slavery and etc because those things had already been done a thousand times over.

You go direct a film and then let me know how it turns out.

reply

If I may tell you the truth, I was really happy that this movie isn't as brutal as you seem to have wanted it to be. If you want more violence, blood and gore, there are plenty of movies out there, who should be your cup of tea. Because you are right, this movie is more like a Jane Austen story or "Downton Abbey". And yeah, if that is not your thing, well, this movie was probably not for you either...

You seem to miss that Dido, despite the fact that she was a "negro" in the 18th century, never had been a slave. She grew up with aristocratic relatives, who were willing to give her a really good life. And she was even made an heiress, which her blonde beautiful cousin never was. So she was of course far removed from all the misery, that many of "her kind" had to endure at the time. And as the story takes place in England, there were no slaves around to become beaten into pulp. But still, Dido had to face racism. And there was plenty of discussion about the poor slaves, who had been murdered on the Zong. And yes, Dido was also almost raped by that creepy man, who was to become her brother-in-law. And that is good enough for me, thank you...

Intelligence and purity.

reply