MovieChat Forums > Carol (2016) Discussion > OT: has anyone here seen SISTER SMILE?

OT: has anyone here seen SISTER SMILE?


… It's a French language film, based on the life of Jeannine Deckers, a.k.a. "the singing nun". Here's the trailer for it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYluG5QYP88

Fans of the late Debbie Reynolds may recall that she portrayed Ms. Deckers in the lighthearted American version, the 1966 musical, THE SINGING NUN. Here's the trailer for it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0f6Wn9pwDgA

Naturally, this 2009 French language version is much closer to the real life of the title character – delving into her struggles in the convent, her rise to stardom, and her bittersweet relationship with a woman named Annie, who ended up being a romantic partner as well as a companion.

The film is well made and very, very watchable – with a delightful score, including her fabulous hit DOMINIQUE – a song which relatively recently gained a new audience by being included in the second season of AMERICAN HORROR STORY, of all shows!

Anyway, I wish there was somebody to talk to about this fascinating story!

If any of you know about the the real life story, you will know what a tragic end she had. And I often wonder if maybe knowing Annie was bad for her, because went along with her plans to end her life. And I think a lover should never go along with such a plan. They ended up dying together, which is rather poetic, but still a tragedy.

Nonetheless, this movie is very, very intriguing – and extremely watchable! I would recommend it to all fans here who love quaint films about the past, biopics, and films about lesbian love.

Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

"I would recommend it to all fans here who love quaint films about the past, biopics, and films about lesbian love."


Really. This film is what you consider a film about "lesbian love"?

Saying that this film is about "lesbian love" is like saying that Turner & Hooch is a love story about bestiality.

reply

Really. This film is what you consider a film about "lesbian love"?

Saying that this film is about "lesbian love" is like saying that Turner & Hooch is a love story about bestiality.


How come every reply you make to one of my post is usually rude? First this today on another thread where you suggest that I'm crazy http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2402927/board/nest/264597559?d=265101124#265101124

And now you come here to criticize my tastes on this thread.

You know, it's people like you who give lesbians a bad name. You're pushy, overly-sensitive, and completely arrogant – thinking you know it all about being a lesbian!

SISTER SMILE is a film about lesbian love, even if it's just a subplot. Lesbian love is a big part of the movie, like it or not. And I would argue that it's more than a subplot anyway, as it is the lesbianism that contributes to the character's decision to enter a convent in the first place, which you would know, if you actually spent more time trying to understand the movie and less time judging its fans!

Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

Ignore her. She's full of herself. Who cares what she has to say about any movie? Just ignore her.

reply

Ignore her. She's full of herself. Who cares what she has to say about any movie? Just ignore her.


So, because I'm sharing my love for movies, you think I'm full of myself? Because I'm trying to get the conversation started and am enthusiastic to use these boards for what their intended for – conversation – I'm full of myself?

And yet you and that other poster are the ones who seem to think that you can rule this board, and dictate what others have the right to like or not like without being teased. It seems like the only people here who are full of themselves are you two!

What do you have against me anyway? You don't even freaking know me!!

I truly hope that neither of you are parents, because you act like you haven't gotten out of high school yourselves, what with your cliquish attitudes. It's truly shameful that any adults would act like you two. You're like the girls from MEAN GIRLS! And you're making me think that all GLBTQ folks are just jerks---cause I haven't met a nice one yet (thanks for setting a bad example)!

Too bad you and your little pal had to take a friendly conversation and turn it into something else.

Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

[deleted]

You're terribly out of line. You can add me as #3 to the other posters who called you out.


Well, that really is too bad. I did think you're one of the more levelheaded people on this board. I guess that was one of the things I was wrong about.

Like the others, you are reactionary, take things out of context, and are judgmental in the worst possible way.

Those remarks I made that you didn't like – I did them in self-defense – based on terribly rude posts from the other two – that you totally ignored. I didn't see you calling them out, when one of them said I had "a screw loose" just for my movie tastes – which is what prompted me to respond the way I have – also, if you even bothered to pay attention, that person said to ignore me before I ever said anything about GLBTQ people being jerks! See here:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2402927/board/nest/264597559?d=265101124#265101124

And then you have the nerve to say this:

your comments reflect that you have some kind of agenda in pushing/trolling certain 'lesbian' movies and I'm going to follow the good advice given by lglg and that's to ignore you.


So, in other words, you people have some real issues. You seem to suffer from some kind of paranoia thinking that I'm "pushing an agenda" – seriously? This is a freaking movie board, and I had just gotten through watching a movie that I loved – so I wanted to talk about it so bad, but there's no traffic on its board, so I shared it here--where I thought that I might meet some people who loved it too – thinking that this is one of the few boards of people that might have seen it. My mistake. You're all idiots!


Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

[deleted]

I didn't have to read prior posts to be offended by what you said about LGBTQ people.
Of course not, because you're reactionary and look for reasons to be offended. But, like I said, thinking you were more logical than that originally, if you had read the prior posts, you would have seen how utterly rude to me in the first place, and you would've chimed in long before now – to tell those two people to be polite. But you didn't, which makes you just as bad as them or worse, and invalidates any point you want to make about my own rudeness – because yes, it was in self-defense.

And if you don't like what I said about LGBTQ people being jerks, here's an idea---DON'T BE A JERK!

Words have consequences
Exactly! So when I had people telling me that I must have "a screw loose" with that I must be crazy for having an opinion on a movie that they don't agree with, the consequence of those rude words was for me to have an even lower opinion of the LGBTQ community than I already did for my past experiences with them being rude to me. As you said, words have consequences.

lashing out at a whole group of LGBTQ people and lumping them into a category called 'jerks who aren't nice.' Shame on you - would you say that about Black or Jewish people?
,No, shame on you! Shame on you for not defending me when I was just trying to have a polite conversation, shame on you for trying to shame me, shame on you completely!

Would you chastise a black person who has a low opinion of white people based on their past experiences? I don't think so. You would probably apologize and assure that black person that not all white people are like that. That's the same approach you should've taken with me. You should've apologized for the other two's rude behavior, and assured me that not all GLBTQ people are like that. But instead, you decided to join up with them in order to bully me with shaming.

Would you chastise an agnostic for having a low opinion of nuns and priests, if their bad experiences in the past gave them that opinion? No, something tells me you wouldn't.

Would you condemn a liberal who had a low opinion of conservatives and Trump supporters, based on their experiences? No, you probably wouldn't.

Would you come out in defense of Trump supporters, shaming the liberal saying that it's not fair to judge all Trump supporters? No, I can almost guarantee one of your hypocritical ilk most certainly would not.

Yet, you think it's okay to jump to the defense of two people who are essentially bullies, in the name of all GLBTQ people? Don't make me laugh! That's the very definition of hypocrisy right there.

Because someone doesn't agree with your movie tastes doesn't make them paranoid.
What makes you paranoid is not that you don't agree with my movie tastes, but that you claimed that I was "pushing an agenda by posting about certain lesbian films". That's one of the most paranoid statements a person could make on a movie discussion board!!

You've made your suggestions, and that's good for a movie board, but then you've made some awful comments about two posters (now I'm #3) and LGBTQ people that are incendiary, ignorant and hurtful.
Once again, if you cared so much about this board and about kindness, why didn't you chime in sooner, and tell those other two people to stop being rude in the first place? They were the ones that told me I was crazy and had a screw loose, the other poster was the one that told her to ignore me, etc. etc. – all before I ever said the things that you're taking issue with now. You can't do that. You can't just ignore what led up to this and not be called out for your ignorance. It's astonishing!

As I said in the first place, it's too bad that all you people had to take what was supposed to be a friendly discussion and turn it into something else. I am truly sorry that you all chose to conduct yourselves in such a reactionary and rude way.

Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

[deleted]

What I did read was your derogatory comments about LGBTQ people and that's what I responded to.
You can't blame me for the truth. All I did was tell the truth based on my experiences with the LGBTQ community. If the truth is derogatory, I can't help that.

Your examples about chastising an agnostic or a black person or Trump supporters are just that - examples - which have nothing at all to do with what you wrote and what I responded to.
Hey, I only gave those examples because you asked me about how I would treat Jewish people and black people, so I responded in kind.

Life can be hard enough without getting hurt or angry on an internet forum.
That's true. Thanks.

Adios,
Adios to you too.

Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

[deleted]

GLBTQ? That's not how the community is referred to or how it refers to itself. The correct acronym is LGBTQ.

Putting the "G" first tells me that you're not a lesbian.

My, but you're arrogant! You couldn't just leave it as a polite bit of info, to help me understand "the community" better – but you had to add the rude presumptuous bit as-well!

When it comes to the lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender-queer community, you're just a poser. And probably a fag hag.
Is that supposed to be an insult? LOL! I wouldn't be part of your self-important, overly-sensitive community if you paid me! When it comes to the LGBTQ community, I think you're all ridiculous for the reasons I already explained: you're overly political, hot-headed, irrational, and self-righteous! As an easy-going, old-fashioned girl with a keen sense of romance, I don't need your silly labels or "community" (i.e. clique) to validate me, my idea of love, or my movie tastes!

---cause I haven't met a nice one yet (thanks for setting a bad example)!

LOL! And with this, you shot yourself in the foot.
LOL! Nope, with that, I simply called you and your ilk out for your rudeness. Don't like it? Here's a tip: DON'T BE RUDE!


Your thinly veiled purpose for coming here and creating a discussion thread was to trash Carol:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2402927/board/thread/263605007.
Oh, you mean my very sweet thread – where I generously gave my movie recommendations for those who may have wanted some, and said very kind things about Carol, but admitted that I was underwhelmed by it (saying it in a lot nicer a way than most people on this board did). It's called a conversational prompt – but then again, you already knew that – you just enjoy being an idiot.

After reading your post and other comments you've made since, I've come to a conclusion different from tvjv: you're FOS.
And after another of your bullying posts, I've come to the conclusion that there's no hope for you – you are just a bully---arrogant, ornery, nit-picky, trashy, and hypocritical! Thanks again for representing your "community" so very well----and for proving my original point once more!


Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply