So John Cryer kills the husband and then is allowed to life happily ever after (eventually) with the dead guy's wife and it is ok that he is not punished since a serial killer confessed to the crime? Does anyone besides me have a problem with this?
shareIf morality had to be an influence on movie scripts we'd all have missed out on a lot of terrific films.
Do...or do not.
There is no try.
Yoda
Yeah I've also had a problem with it.
So you can kill a person and live happily ever after?! At least turn Ricky into a villain or something, but this is like he's getting the hot chick, he's still a good person and got two best-selling books?!
Well, the husband did pretty much admit to being a murderer, so you could call it justice.
share^ That, and I think it was a 'kill or be killed' situation. If Cryer didn't kill the husband, the husband certainly would've killed him and his wife.
Whatever you wish for me, I hope you have twice as much.
You watch films for their moral message? Good gosh.
shareMorality. Lolz because there's just so much of it oozing out of Hollywood.
shareI understand your desire for a moral message. This movie wasn't aiming for that though. Since you've gone there so-to-speak, what about a friend, in this case Seth, willing to go along with such a plan, who's only concern is of his friend getting caught? I'd definitely add that to the list you've already made above.
The only truly objectionable line in the whole movie for me was when Sasso's Seth made the unnecessarily rude comment about Kathleen Turner's looks.
that's why the husband turned out to ACTually be a murderer though.. so it was self-defence..
c'mon man