Question for Swedes?
Why was Anna Odell bullied? I thought she was actually the most attractive woman at the reunion by far so it's kind of hard to imagine her being bullied.
Leave the gun, take the cannoli...
She was bullied because she was "weird" and "different". It's clearly stated in the film. Her looks has got nothing to do with it. You finding her to be "the most attractive" woman at the party is purely subjective anyway.
Even if you find it hard to imagine attractive people being bullied, it still happens every day. Your case here is pretty ignorant tbh.
It's very rare for an attractive person, especially a girl, to be bullied. All she'd have to do is latch onto some jock who'd be happy to have her. I find your comment to be pretty premenstrual syndromy.
Leave the gun, take the cannoli...
Please provide me with your epic truth about how bullying is always based on a girls looks.
Latch on to some guy who'd be happy to have her? What do you mean? That it's the girls fault that she doesn't just give her away to some random guy? yay for victim blaming.
Perhaps if you did not erect strawman arguments you would not fail so badly in attempting to make a point.
The persons you are spending to did not say "it is always based on a girl's looks."
Rather they said good looking girls are less often bullied, and very good looking girls rarely so, which is a fact born up by the science. We have the lots of science and studies on bullying victims. There is actually a lot of science on it.
With boys, height, physical strength matter a lot. with girls attractiveness level matters a lot.
I can certainly understand someone agreeing with this part of the comment:
"It's very rare for an attractive person, especially a girl, to be bullied."
This second part, however:
"All she'd have to do is latch onto some jock who'd be happy to have her. I find your comment to be pretty premenstrual syndromy."
is rank with primitive outdated sexism. What kind of normal civilized person in his/her right mind would write such utter nonsense? It is indefensible to blatantly state that girls should more or less prostitute themselves to be protected and accepted, and then go on to refer to a part of the natural occurring menstrual cycle as some form denigration and excuse not to take someones opinion seriously. Bloody remnant of the middle ages, he (I assume) needs to learn how to argue his point like a grown-up, acting like such a fool makes it impossible to take anything he says seriously; because he sounds like a f-----g ignorant idiot.