MovieChat Forums > The Night Of (2016) Discussion > blood evidence

blood evidence

posted 7 years ago by mephistox2001
3 replies | jump to latest

great show, but i have a couple of questions. spoliers! for the amount of blood that was in andrea's bedroom, and if naz was supposed to be the killer, wouldn't some have splattered all over his body or his clothes when committing the crime? and am i mistaken or was the only blood on his hand from breaking the glass, and scratches on his back from having sex with her, while his clothes looked quite clean? why was this not used as a defense and seen as a red flag by the police, csi and prosecution? this was not mentioned at all.

[–] jannis_littmann 7 years ago

I was thinking exactly the same thing. Blood all over the place. And since he didn't grab a shower (blood on his back, no evidence in bathroom) and didn't change his outfit it all doesn't really add up to begin with.

[–] Nosoupfryou 7 years ago

He woke up downstairs, his clothes were downstairs, this is where they started. From what I saw, he broke the window with his elbow, not his hand. The last three eps are very telling and have to be watched closely.

[–] tribalmaggot 7 years ago

He broke the window with his elbow but cut his hand when he reached through to unlock the door. The camera focuses on it and the blood on the glass afterwards.