Global Warming is a hoax funded by globalists.

Weather it was peak oil, global cooling, ozone hole, global warming, or today's flavor of the week title of "climate change", the groups pushing it are always the same. The solutions are always more govt, communism, global blah blah. Tomorrow it'll be called something else, and all the international workers party groups will show up to their rally's with their machine made signs calling for bigger govt, end to capitalism, la la la. They'll blame the US, call for more regulation, and China and Russia will magically be left out of the "calls for change". Fortunately people know who these groups are now and that's why anyone with half a brain knows these lame causes are just that. Doesn't matter how many shows on science the left hijacks, or how many socalled scientists from the left join the minority consensus. The vast majority sees it for the bs that it is.

"When he found that his long cherished beliefs did not agree with the most precise observations, he accepted the uncomfortable facts. He preferred the hard truth to his dearest illusions. That is the heart of science."
- Carl Sagan on Johannes Kepler

Yeah. You should write it up and get yourself the Nobel.

Individual countries couldn't solve this problem without trashing their economies if it actually existed.

Unfortunately, the evidence for global warming isn't confined to what is occurring in Antarctica, and while the isolated data point of this year may be puzzling, the long term effects are what truly indicate climate change direction.

What we have thus far in published consensus indicates that 97% of climate papers take the position that not only is global warming occuring, but that it's largely manmade.

The evidence can be found in many places, not only in ice sheets. Plants in Australia have thickened wax surfaces to counter the warming trend to the extent that researchers are looking into koalas to see how this will effect that particular population (i.e., will they be able to digest and extract nutrients from leaves with the thicker coating). Aside from biota, ocean acidification is another indicator.

I was thumbing through some old Environmental Science and Technology magazines stored in my lab and the first one I opened (vintage 1986) has an article on -- guess what? -- global warming.

Scientists have known about warming for decades, it's only after Al Gore attempted to raise public awareness in the new millennium that the public at large have weighed in, and those -- without exception thus far in my experience -- that are naysayers are so due to a political perspective, not a scientific perspective. Meaning, once their political party states an opinion on the topic (or their favorite political entertainer on cable or radio) then they follow suit like good little soldiers.

I suggest on scientific studies stick with the science, forget the politics, and where the science takes us, we go, no matter the results.

Only a dunce could look at the actual data and conclude global warming is a hoax.

The cause of the global warming is up for debate, as it isn't nearly as clear-cut, but global warming is occurring.

TxMike
Make a choice, to take a chance, to make a difference.

[deleted]

So physics wrong, BS right? OK Lets run a test. Find a greenhouse, seal it with duct tape and on a 90-100 degree summer day. Fill it with Co2. Live in it for a month.

Even if it is a hoax isn't it more sensible to switch to a different energy source than the ones we are currently using?