She was a poor and probably undereducated widow with no skills, so she probably saw it as a way to survive. And if her son had been a bad kid who had given her a lot of heartache, you can't blame her too much.
Can't blame her for selling her son down the river and letting him die for a crime he didn't commit (or even helping frame him) just to get a sweet deal out of it?
No matter what he did (and from what she was saying, it wasn't more than petty crime and troublemaking), that buys her no karma from me.
And that's what she has to tell him when she sees him for the last time?
Also, let's not forget that this poor widow (who was not undereducated, she was an accountant and had a paying job), when told her son was innocent of the crime he was executed for, asked how much money she could get out of it. And then probably went to the people who had been paying her off for him to take the fall all along, to get them to up the ante. She most likely cashed a big fat sum before leaving town. Yeah. Mother of the Year. Poor her.
I wonder if Christine lied about being with her father when he supposedly committed the murder because she loved him so much and couldn't believe he was guilty.
I don't think so. If that was the case she probably wouldn't have told anyone about it later. I do think he'll end up being guilty though. She was a child, and they already established that memory is a funny thing and you sometimes only remember what you want to.
Obviously a lot of the show is going to be built around parent-children relationships. Adam is in for a big betrayal from his father. Christina's dad may be guilty. Bankowski and his mom. Terry and his dad. And that Zale guy and his son possibly?
For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco
reply
share