MovieChat Forums > Life Itself (2014) Discussion > What Movies Did You Agree/Disagree with ...

What Movies Did You Agree/Disagree with Roger Ebert?


I remember reading his review of Planes, Trains and Automobiles and he was not entirely thrilled. He didn't like Steve Martin's character, he hated the music, he had a lot of complaints. Since I liked the movie, it really stuck in my mind. Years later, I went back to read his review and he had changed it. Now it was a holiday favorite, no music complaints, etc. I always wondered if he read it later and found it too harsh or if, after it become so popular, he thought his review looked incorrect.

Still, I liked Roger Ebert and on his recommendation I went to see Made in America. One of the worst movies ever IMO. It starred Whoopie Goldberg and Ted Danson and talk about a lot of obnoxious overacting with these two. Ted Danson was completely over the top and wearing cowboy boots, it was just dumb. I could not understand what Ebert liked about the movie, it was just really bad.

After that, I hesitated to blindly go to the movies he recommended but I often was struck by how well written his reviews were. He was good at cutting to the core of a character, such as Sideways, where his first observation is Paul Giamatti plays an alcoholic. I wanted to give Paul Giamatti's character more credit, but in reality, Ebert was right.

I read that Ebert taught some film classes; I would have loved to have attended or even seen him lecture. I bet they were interesting.

reply

I remember he didn't like war of worldz remake bec da alienz were tripodz and thought dat wuz dumb bec wudnt quad pod be mo stable. I thought remake wuz amazin esp da sound and visual fx which still looked very real 2day. I'll admit dat da kidz in dat movie were extremely annoyin and Tim Robbinz scene shudve been cut, but fx were amazin and story told verbatim up 2 alienz bein tripodz and only time period and location were changed.

Werd 2 ur mudda, bruddafcker

reply

Ebert didn't like-A Clockwork Orange, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, Full Metal Jacket, John Carpenter's The Thing, Reservoir Dogs, and Blue Velvet. All films that I love.

Films that come to mind that I'm glad he praised-

Picked Dark City as the best film of the year.

Gave a 4 star review to the original Tron.

He went way overboard praising Do the Right Thing. I think he said when it was over he wept in the theater for an hour alone in the dark. Okaaaaaay.....

reply

With Siskel & Ebert, I found that I agreed most often with Siskel on their simple 'Thumbs Up/Down' scale. But, on the more important movies, my heart was with Ebert.

In a nutshell, that's why the dynamic of them together was so vital.

reply

Always thought Ebert and Siskel overrated Martin Scorsese. That doesn't mean, of course, that Martin has no talent. He's very talented. But, I never liked MEAN STREETS, and RAGING BULL was pretty boring the second time around. Thought CAPE FEAR and THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST were pretty stupid and rather silly. Prefer TAXI DRIVER, AFTER HOURS, HUGO, and THE DEPARTED. I recognize the brilliance behind GOODFELLOWS, but I'm not inspired by the characters and thought Scorsese didn't go far enough or deep enough. The GODFATHER movies are still better, more profound, I think.

The problem with Ebert, and Siskel, for that matter, is that they failed to recognize that the most entertaining and inspiring movies are the best movies. I'd still much rather watch RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK or INDEPENDENCE DAY or WRECK-IT RALPH once again than see TAXI DRIVER or GOODFELLOWS again. Or, most of the other independent and foreign movies Ebert regularly put in his Top 10 lists.











reply

It is Goodfellas not Goodfellows. By all means go watch the Hollwood crap popcorn movies you mentioned. I find it astonishing that you find Raging Bull rather boring and Cape Fear and The Last Temptation of Christ pretty stupid and rather silly as they are considered all masterpieces. To each his own.

reply

One I disagreed with was Dead Poets Society. I liked it that it didn't follow the traditional format and had a life goes on ending. Also, he gave away in his review what happened to Neil. Good thing I hadn't read his review before seeing it.

reply

I think throughout the 2000s, there was a lot of his reviews that I disagreed with. Two prominent ones that stood out were Crash (not the Cronenberg one), which he called the best film of 2005 and Rendition. He gave both four stars and I couldn't disagree more. They were both just lacking in subtlety and convoluted to the max. But I appreciated his review, at least he was very fond of Brokeback Mountain as well. I recall he got into a debate with another critic (I forget who) regarding Crash. Alas...therein lies the beauty of films and taste, it's subjective.

reply

I disagree with a lot of his reviews, but I never dismiss them and always respect his opinion. If I could ask one thing of Mr. Ebert I would ask him to rewatch and re-review Stardust Memories because that's a four star film (he gave it two). My other two big ones were already mentioned (A Clockwork Orange and Blue Velvet).


"That moonwalk back there was streets ahead buddy."

reply

what does it matter whether you agree with him or not, really?

he likes what he likes, you like what you like, end of story. he's a great writer and his reviews are fun to read. maybe you learn a little bit extra about the movie, maybe not, but he wrote the same quality review whether it was the big blockbuster or the little movie you wouldn't have heard of otherwise. i've discovered quite a few gems from his reviews that i'd never have come across otherwise, which is far more valuable to me than if he slagged the matthew broderick godzilla picture and i loved it (which i didn't, but that's beside the point).

i think his only ratings to be taken truly seriously are his "great movies", and i've never seen one of them that was less than excellent.

reply

Who cares? Actually I think he would care. I think he would enjoy this thread immensely and debate for hours.

reply

as a guy who could debate for hours on any topic for any reason, of course he would.

but he couldn't care less whether you agreed with any particular review, and he'd think if you were reading his reviews as something that you would have to agree with he'd say you were reading them for the wrong reason.

btw, i doubt very much that he rewrote the planes/trains review, though he did write a second review for his great movies section.

reply

Nope, I'm pretty certain he rewrote it. I remember specific passages and years later they were gone and now it was practically a classic. As someone who travels a lot for work, I really related to the trailers so looked forward to his review.

reply

i'm pretty sure he didn't, since he didn't rewrite any of his other reviews.

maybe he said something different on the show and that's what you remember.

reply

Well I guess you missed The Tree of Life, surely the worst film made by a name filmmaker which I heard he loved.

reply

tree of life - the one that was nominated for best picture and dozens of other awards? surely that's a dead giveaway that a film is terrible.... why don't you just declare it to be "the worst movie evarrrrr" and get that over with? (yawn)

no i haven't seen the tree of life, just haven't gotten around to it yet. but i loved the thin red line, so will probably enjoy it.

reply

When they started out I used to agree a lot with Roger, but over time he just started being a total celebrity slut it was very rare that he would pan any movie. A good recent example was the absolutely horrid SciFi movie "Prometheus". That movie was completely without a brain, a point, any acting, but it looked beautiful and it was from one of the people he was beholden too, Ridley Scott. Notice in the trailer to this movie there is Martin Scorcese and Werner Herzog both making a big deal out of Roger. I am a contrarian about both of these guys. I don't care much for anything Scorcese has done, but Herzog is really excellent when he gets it right ... but Ebert would never say anything bad about either of them.

Sideways was an entertaining comedy, good but not great. Most American movies like this are about bums, if they are not they play it up and pipe in organ music so we know we are supposed to be impressed and reverent. Americans are catered to so much these days it has created a warpage in our collective unconscious ... and that is what Ebert never did, he never played the role of a critic, pointing that out, he was a salesman, a purveyor of mostly junk, and he knew it.

reply

bruce 129:

I don't care much for anything Scorcese has done, but Herzog is really excellent when he gets it right ... but Ebert would never say anything bad about either of them.


I guess you didn't actually see LIFE ITSELF then. Scorsese goes into a long bit about Ebert trashed COLOR OF MONEY (and this after S&E mc'd a tribute to him).

I also wouldn't call later-day Ebert "a total celebrity slut it was very rare that he would pan any movie." I would agree he became more of a softie towards the end, but, then again, many folks soften as they age. Ebert was still able to dish it out at times. Check out his books: I Hated, Hated, Hated This Movie; A Horrible Experience of Unbearable Length: More Movies That Suck and Your Movie Sucks. PLENTY of nasty reviews - even during his older softer years.


P.S. I also liked PROMETHEUS. Didn't love it, but it was ok.

reply

Oh come on .... to take a pattern and make it not look like a pattern one must have exceptions. Color Of Money was OK to trash because it was a sequel to a great movie and it would be expected by a film critic.

I totally out of sync with the rest of the world I guess. There is no a single Scorcese movie I think is very good. It is all the exploitation of violence. I do like his documentaries. I liked the first half of "The Departed" it was orchestrated like a symphony and then it turned to crap.

And it is also easy to pick out movies later for hatred, but at the time they need to make money and generate tickets, that is what Ebert was about.

Glad you got something out of Prometheus .... I really hate that movie. I liked the TED talk by Peter Weyland better than the whole movie. ;-)

reply


"Trashed" is a very strong term to use too, because if you read his original review of The Color of Money, he still gave it 2 1/2 stars, which still translates to a thumb down, but a minor one. The director definitely picked the worst criticism of the movie from the show to make it seem like a worse review than it was.

"Trashed" would be more like the one star he gave Team America: World Police, still one of the funniest movies I've seen in a theater, and probably the one movie I disagreed with him most on.

reply

He gave Prometheus a 4!

reply

Roger gave Thumbs Up to Cop and 1/2, which, was to me was annoyingly awful. Really no surprise that the kid worked for 4 years and was out.

reply