This movie was produced by the same woman who did "An Inconvenient Truth." So are we all going to die from the Earth becoming an uninhabitable crisp first or are we all going to drop dead from sugar consumption first? I'm not sure which liberal *beep* doomsday scenario takes precedence here.
shareGlobal warmin is fake
Werd 2 ur mudda, bruddafcker
Global warming has already happened and is getting worse.
shareSez who? Da same meteorologistz dat can't even get da 5 day forecast rite?
shareNo, says 97% of Climatologists (vs random dude on internet who has difficulty spelling a single word right).
shareLol so I suppose climatetoligistz r mo accurate, eh? Doesn't dat make u wonder why they keep these loserz at da TV stationz who can't even predict dis week's weather?
Hey so I thought I enlitenzzz-zzzzzz u or u think I'm some schmuk. Here is article dat explain ur so called 97% http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240527023034803045795784628135531 36?mobile=y
And my fave link http://www.petitionproject.org/
OMG buddy you just linked to an article from the president of the Heartland Institute, a climate denial institute funded by right-wing anti-environment corporations and big oil and a petition that has the Spice Girls among it's signers (and the scientists it does have are ones that say they didn't even sign and ones that have no accreditation in climate science, as if someone with a degree in computer science knows anything about atmospheric conditions)
Your sources are as bad as your English. Believe what you want to believe, it has no effect on reality.
"The great thing about science is that it's true whether you believe in it or not" Neil DeGrasse Tyson
You're the one arguing with an obvious troll. I don't know who's the bigger fool.
----------------------
Boopee doopee doop boop SEX
Actually u iz wrong der is climate change becuz 2day iz hotter dan it woz last year but its nowt 2 do wid carbon emitionzz.
Da cauzz iz fat peeps farting en burpin becuz dey eat lots en lots of junk foodzz. All dat methane gaz is melting da polar capz, and killin da ozone layer
Da end of der worldzz iz cumin we iz under stealth attack from sugar muncherzz
BBB, you've zeroed right on in to the main point. I will not see this movie, so maybe I am wrong, but based on the trailer, my belief is that the point of this movie is "make the government fix this!" I don't think the government will, I don't think the government can, and I don't the government should. All the best this film can do is report the situation to the people and then the people can change their habits if they want to, or not, as the case may be. There is nothing new being reported here; it's all been known since at least the 1950s.
sharewhy is eating healthy a liberal thing?
I don't think the point of the movie was make the government fix things. I think the point was the government has been feeding false information and that people take the government's word for gospel and have been for decades(ie "why would the government okay it if it isn't true?"). I think it's for more government accountability and honesty and honestly what's so wrong with that?
why is eating healthy a liberal thing?
I thought that the whole point of the movie was that the government was at odds with itself.
Personally I don't understand why, if conservatives believe in small government, they don't denounce and protest government subsidies to particular industries. That seems like an easy angle with witch to address the issue and it has a nice libertarian spin.
Honestly I feel like the "small government" spiel is just lip service. It typically doesn't come up when it goes against special interests.
Happy birthday to the ground!
its just leftist tin foil SCARE mongering, they scare you with sugar, with hot summers, and WAR on WOMEN, WAR on BLACKS, WAR on immigrants, WAR on MIDDLE class, so the ignorant and weak minded people will keep voting the democrats in. Keep them in control and power. Yeah keep believing in those lies, let's ask how that is doing for Detroit as well as most of California.
-things I write on IMDB may come from my blog
So your argument is someone can only make one movie in their lifetime? Or only focus on one theme?
"James Cameron made a movie about robots, so he shouldn't be allowed to make one about the Titanic." Right?