MovieChat Forums > The Act of Killing (2012) Discussion > Congo 'vomiting' at the end

Congo 'vomiting' at the end



Sounded like he got a dose of the runs, rather than the remorse and sorrow he was pretending to exclaim.

I'd imagine he was sheppered into giving that display.

Congo is a monster, and a serious one.

i get that decent people can get caught up in a nasty process like decent Japanese did in WW2 and do horrible things.

But let's not forget that Congo was a bad man to start with. He was a self proclaimed "gangster" when the army enlisted him to do their dirty work

He's a terrible man and it's also terrible that he'll never be held accountable for his unspeakable acts

reply

I'm glad you brought that up. It would be nice to think it was a spontaneous and unaffected display of catharsis, something that indicated that Congo was suffering for all his ill deeds. I think he wanted to suggest that, and I would be disappointed if he had been primed somehow. I don't think the director would do that, but as with much research, 'participants' often get a lot of cues about what sort of behaviour they should engage in (demand characteristics).

Some of it may have been genuine though. Returning to a spot where you killed maybe dozens of people is likely to have some kind of effect on your state of mind, particularly if (as above) you feel like it should have some kind of effect and that that should involve some kind of display of emotion.

Its a strange, strange scene though. Its almost as though he was engaging in an exorcism, a casting out of demons, or more cynically trying to create that effect

reply

I personally felt it was disingenuise to himself, he was trying to feel remorse and empathy but couldnt and realised he was damned for eternity.

The scene where he watched himself being killed, he said "I felt like they did".

I thought no you didnt and he knew it. he wanted to feel it but couldnt.

reply

"The scene where he watched himself being killed, he said "I felt like they did".

I thought no you didnt and he knew it. he wanted to feel it but couldnt."


Its a start. People with no empathy, can learn something like it. He has a long way to go though....eternity perhaps

reply

That excersize was bizarre, but it did seem to break the jovial attitude he had. Of course he could have been acting, but why? The entire film he revelled in his past, claiming it for his glory. Do you think he cares what we (the international community) thinks of him? If not, then who would he be performing for?

I didn't know if I bought the whole 'retching' thing, but that scene seemed to shake him. I loved that the director confronted him when he claimed, "Now I know what they felt like." The director rightly said something like "No you didn't, because you weren't afraid you were going to die." I was thinking, "No you didn't, because you didn't die with a wire around your neck."

This film was a terrifying look at our capabilities as human beings toward sociopathic and psychopathic behavior.

reply

The scene is inherently ambiguous and I think that's what makes it so powerful. I hope people don't watch it and think of it as necessarily some kind of cathartic moment where Congo realizes all his bad deeds. You should hear Errol Morris describe that scene here, starts at about the 9 minutes 50 seconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLQxVy7R9qo

reply

I've read some interesting interpretations of that scene and his behavior throughout. Here is a guy that proclaims he got a lot of his killing method influence from watching movies. Knowing he's become a focal point for this movie, I imagine he's also seen movies centered around characters that suffer the consequences of their ruthless past. Is he really a man that has realized his unredeemable qualities or acting like one for the sake of the film? Definitely ambiguous which makes discussing it worthwhile.

reply

I suspected that man of crocodile tears all the way through. I imagine that kind of retching is difficult to simulate, but I still find it hard to believe. I hope he is plagued in his dreams, but I'm not convinced that he is. I would like to believe he is sorry, but I just don't.





It's about how audaciously you are carrying on in calm.

reply

I think he was simulating. His retching was partially credible, but then became pretty fake. And nothing came out of his mouth.
So I think he wanted to appear more human, because he knows that "ordinary people" would feel bad with that stuff.
I imagine that his thoughts on that moment were like: "A normal person would vomit now; and I want to vomit... but I can't. But since I can't, it means that I don't feel bad with that. Then, why I want to appear like I do?"
And that was the moment in which he really started to feel bad. Not that kind of "bad". But just bad.

reply

People don't really vomit every time. When people retch it is a strong reaction to smell. I know for one fact when you spill a lot of blood there is a very lasting smell. It seemed he was retching at that distasteful image from the past.

reply

The first time they visited there he was dancing.

reply

Yes, that was sickening, but at the end he had a different pov to the entire situation than the beginning. He relived his experiences and saw how horrible they were through the re-enactments.

reply

I believed he was retching. I don't think that was fake at all.

reply

I thought all the Indonesian people shown, excepting the poor Chinese people who still have to pay these extortionists, were monsters. I've never been to Indonesia and I never will. Awful place if North Sumatra is anything to go by. Pity the komodo dragons haven't eaten them.

HOWEVER, the only saving grace in this film was Anwar Congo. I thought it clear that his bewilderment at his feelings and wondering if they were like those of his victims was sincere. The violent physical reaction he had at the end seemed to me to be the trauma in his body. In spite of all his swagger I don't believe he was able to suppress the trauma at killing so many people. Killing them in the name of communism but actually it looked like plain racism to me.

I agree that's it's terrible he'll never be held accountable but what's worse is the political pleasure some of the current Indonesians take from this history and the rest seemed to be apathetic and willing to be bought for a high price.

I give my respect to those who have earned it; to everyone else, I'm civil.

reply

I feel the scene is completely staged. I'm amazed that in all of these posts no one has mentioned the obvious - he has white hair again in this scene. That means it was shot early on, before they had even filmed the movie within the documentary because he died his hair black for that. And his hair was black in the scene right before the end where he is watching the footage of himself being "tortured" and perhaps has a real moment of empathy.

To then cut to a scene where he has white hair, AND goes into a brief explanation of how the wire is an efficient way to kill someone - a topic he had already covered multiple times in the doc and which had just been simulated in the scene right before this - all points to this "final" scene being shot very early on. That would mean most of the scenes of him with dark hair bragging about how he killed people were shot after this supposed epiphany of his.

And no, it would make no sense for him to die his hair back to white at the end, and it would take many months for his white hair to grow back in with no trace of the black dye left in it.


"My name is Paikea Apirana, and I come from a long line of chiefs stretching all the way back to the Whale Rider."

reply

I did wonder why he brought up the wire again. This all makes sense.

I was MovieKid56, but then I was cured alright

reply

They shot the film during 6 years.

reply

There is definitely na arc to congo's character developement.

in my opinion from beginning to end the character development was planned out with the director.

Congo was a coconspirator with the filmakers.

We can speculate about his agenda,and I have some theories, but there was clearly a conspiracy. Not all the people in the film were in on the conspiracy, but congo certainly was.

a la sasha baron cohen.

reply

I believed him.

reply