The reviews of this game are 'interesting' re post Gamer Gate
Not least because MGS V was in many ways ideal to serve as a sort of pseudo 'litmus test' to determine the extent of gaming journalism's continued lack of professionalism, debilitating political agenda and general degradation post so-called 'Gamer Gate.
I am of course alluding to the clothes allergic 'Quiet' - a 'controversial' (apparently) female character that had puritanical SJW tossers masquerading as credible gaming journalists/gamers practically lining up to condemn/feign outrage over prior to the game's release.
The question was that if MGS V proved to be a great game, a near masterpiece even, would such politically-compromised reviewers unprofessionally mark it down/reduce their awarded score simply because of their political sensibilities and inane self-righteousness re Quiet?
Well from what I've seen via numerous reviews, the short answer is refreshingly 'no'! Although a fair few did think it still important enough to sneeringly lament Quiet's 'fashion sense' within their reviews though I note...
So if MGS V can be judged as a definitive example then the good news is that gaming journalists of speculative credibility aren't quite unprofessional enough yet to mark a game down for no other reason that it 'offends' their political sensibilities (I.e. not enough ethnic minority characters for their liking, not enough wimmin, the development team are 'too white' et al)....
For the industry's sake let's hope that lasts!