Sickening... Poor child naked in bath tub scene. Was this really needed? It wasn't like she was a little infant.. How old was this child... like 4 years old... sick.
shareNothing about that scene was sexual, let alone "pornographic" in any way.
share[deleted]
"Poor child naked in a bathtub" Are children clothed when they're bathed these days or something?
So only infants are bathed in the nude by their parents? I can recall being bathed by m mother until 6/7 by my mother until she trusted me to do it on my own while she checked often.
It was needed because Gracie was murdered in a drowning by her own mother during her bath. It was realistic and nothing sexual about it. Don't sexualize children's bodies. That part of the film was not supposed to be construed as sexual, and if you take it as such... well... talk to someone. We need to watch out for predators and child pornography, true .) If the child were to be raped or touched in a certain area in a sexual way on the film and it be fully shown THEN there would be problems. But it was simply innocent there.
Don't blame the parents and children for innocence like this... blame the predators.
You know, children tend to be naked when they take baths. It's what happens when they take their clothes off so they don't get wet. What does that have to do with sex?
Boo!
A child having a bath is not pornography, if you think that it is you really should talk to a psychiatrist about it.
shareYou should be arrested for thinking there is anything sexual in that. Get help, seriously.
share