Ultimately pointless.


Is this movie trying to be meta, artistic or what? Exactly what was its point or statement? That a promiscuous gay lifestyle should be celebrated and hardcore gay sex should be shown in a mainstream movie? Ok that point was made in the first 5 minutes, followed by 50 minutes of actors having issues filming that sex. Ok, I get that Franco didn't know the point of this film, neither did most of the actors, but then what? You just throw together a 'fly on the wall' documentary about being confused? Waste of an hour.


http://www.1971-reviewae.com

reply

Yeah, nice planning, Franco. What a jerk. The synopsis is misleading, as if this is supposed to be reimagining cut scenes from a classic film with one of the finest actors in film history, instead this was vile garbage with no point... just gay pornography. it's nothing more, nothing cerebral or anything about it... I wondering for a moment if he was trying to create a prank film kinda like Jacquin Phoenix's film or Andy Kaufman, but no... just pointless gratuitous gay porn garbage.

reply