Horrible movie


Thought I'd seen the worst of Jamie Luner's movies, but no, this one beats them all. She's gotta be over 50 now trying to look young and beautiful? She never looked beautiful. She looked well kept. Make up and scotch tape does wonders to an aging face. But now it doesn't work and her acting stays the same bad performances. I got a big laugh when the leading mean said how beautiful she was and tried to put the make on her. It was a riot. They must have had a hard time of it or were paid an enormous sum. Linden Ashbey looks older now. Very sad.
Gary Hudson the only good actor in the film has not much to do. Once again Sophie Gendron is used by LMN. What is it? A stock company of bad players that are working? Come on give us a break and get some new and YOUNG actresses on the air. Oh, and Luner's clothes (too tight) shows her high waist and plump figure. Her hair is annoying as hell. Constantly looking like a mop head with hair hanging in her face and everywhere else. Oh, I get it. The hair helps cover her aging face. Piece of c--p in this viewers eyes.

reply

Jumping to conclusions,aren't you Geoff?????

reply

Geoff is right on target in my eyes.

reply

You do know everyone ages - right? I think her clothing and hair are part of her character in the movie. Jamie looks just fine to me but if you don't like the way she looks and the movie, don't watch it.

reply

I could barely stand to look at jamie luner and she and linden ashby were not good together. Cheesy movie.

reply

it's got some good gravitas.


Autumn is a second spring when every leaf is a flower.-Albert Camus🍁

reply