MovieChat Forums > Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, Part 1 (2012) Discussion > PG-13???

PG-13???

posted 10 years ago by tyty2790
4 replies | jump to latest

How did this get a PG-13? Because its animated? That has to be the reason, as stupid as it is, because this (part 2 included) is NOT a typical PG-13

[–] Optimus_Prime_is_OP 10 years ago

I live in the UK, and over here, it's a 15 (R)

By the authority of Stan 'The man' Lee, Comic book will now be wrote as 'Comicbook'

[–] PreachCaleb 10 years ago

Are you saying it's too high or not high enough?

Straightedge means I'm better than you.

[–] tyty2790 10 years ago

Not high enough.....it's super bloody and definitely R material

[–] Smug_Grinch 8 years ago

Lots of reference to murders, drug references, bloody fist-fights, a woman showing her breasts (nips covered by swastikas), onscreen deaths (stabbed, bludgeoned, shot, throat slit with broken mug, death by Smilex gas). Then, they went and removed Gordon's cigar-smoking for the child demographic. That's messed up. This movie deserves a solid R-rating.

---
We never really grow up, we only learn how to act in public.