MovieChat Forums > Vikings (2013) Discussion > The Succession of... [SPOILERS]

The Succession of... [SPOILERS]


Anyone bothered by how they did Alfred's ascension to the throne?
Unlike many of the characters who are (half-) legendary, Alfred is a prominent historical figure and he was crowned after his brother dies.
I think even a small battle or skirmish in which his brother dies would be much better than showing Judith as a scheming neurotic assh*le to her oldest son.

I'm also getting increasingly bothered by Judith but not sure if it's the acting or if she really is supposed to have those crazy eyes and weird voice intonation.

reply

Yes it bugged me, but by now the historical issues with this show are so profound that it seemed trifling in comparison. Killing off the future of king of Scandinavia Sigurd bugged me more. And this whole fictional storyline pitting the sons of Ragnar against one another I also find annoying.

As for Aethelred seceding the throne to Alfred I agree it was ridiculous, but once the writers decided to go with that narrative it's hard to blame Judith for doing everything in her power to ensure Alfred's ascension seeing how she recognized the future survival of England depends on it. Alfred understood the only chance they have of defending their homeland against the northmen is to build a navy while it was made clear his stepfather and brother did not value that insight.

reply

You make great points... I didn't know this about Sigurd -- I love and read a lot on British history but know very superficially about Norse history -- it's a HUGE screw-up, unbelievable!

I think it would have been less obvious (and could be seen as "will of god") if she had done all that, failed and then Aethelred being killed almost immediately.... crown to Alfred... this will of god could be used also to inspire people to support him as King (even though he is weak, no warrior, etc).

reply

Yeah that could have worked but it looks like they're doing their best to try and compress the time period to feature as much of Alfred's strategic brilliance and political acumen as possible. I can't blame them too much given Alfred's outsized role in history. Any additional screen time to Aethelred would have just taken away from Alfred's on screen character development.

I'm also less sure that Judith is the hardcore religious nut she started as. She appears to have evolved into a steely eyed realist, like the secular worldliness of Egbert and additional education had rubbed off on her. Not that she'd be above using religion and calls to god as inspiration for the masses to achieve her ends of course, she'd certainly recognize the nature of power and her role as queen demands she cloak herself in religiosity and "divine will" to maintain that power.

reply