Seriously?


How on earth are the underbakers still on the show? They're definitely the weakest team.

reply

They don't deserve to be there... they are immature and definitely not the best.

reply

I know! I thought for sure they'd be gone last week! I think the show needs new judges.

reply

I almost wonder if they didn't keep them for the drama? Really....we don't need drama in the Halloween Wars... I'll stop watching it if it's going to turn into a Jerry Springer thing.

reply

I feel the same way! The show seems to be heading in that direction. I love watching, but I may quit if they keep making drama.

reply

Yes they are, and the behavior of the women on that team is disgusting.

reply

Definitely agree.

reply

I know. They should have gone home last week if not before that. The name of the team who went home last week is escaping me at the moment but that was a load. Their piece was awesome and easy to understand right off the bat. To me it was the display that needed the least amount of explanation.

Now this week with the fighting and *beep* they should have gone home just for that. I wasn't a fan of the Crypt Cookers either because the girl on that team was also a bit of a miserable b1tch, but at least they did a good job.

This season hasn't been nearly as much fun because of these teams being so unlikeable.

It took me three hours to figure out that FU was Felix Ungar.

reply

I agree with everything you said. These teams just aren't very likeable, it's hard to root for them.

reply

Agree. All the fighting is irritating but it's hard to root for the other team either because that blonde woman is such a b!tch.
Hopefully the Sugar Psychos win.

reply

Why is the "blonde woman" such a bitch?!

Did I miss something? She actually seemed very upbeat and a great teammate. I didn't get a bitchy vibe off of her at all.

reply

She seems upbeat to you? She constantly looks pissed off to me, which makes her seem bitchy.

reply

If you're just going by her physical looks, then that is an unfair short-cut.

Listening to what she says, watching how she interacts with her teammates, and noting how she conducts herself, I am not seeing bitchiness at all.

What people "seem" and how they actually are can be two wildly different things.

reply

I wasn't going by just her looks and I'm not the only one to point it out.
Maybe she's nice in real life. Who knows.

reply

No, she definitely had an attitude as well. And was bitchy through most of it... Her sugar skills were amazing and she seemed to get along with her teammates though, so she is way ahead in that department.

reply

I agree, OP. They completely misunderstood the "Two-faced" challenged and should have been eliminated then. For some reason their tiny little rat kept them in the competition?!?! Maybe the producers wanted an "underdog" story? Who knows??

The competition would be way better (and fairer) with the crypt cookers in the finale.

reply

Yeah,for sure! I really thought it would come down to sugar psychos and the crypt cookers or whatever they were called ^^

reply

Right how did the Crypt Cookers go home there. If you want to bring up scale the team that had a scale problem was the underbakers. The people were way too big. To fit into that casket they would need to have their legs cut off by the knee and the mausoleum was shoulder hight. They were only kept to give an easy win for the sugar psychos. Yet another show that keeps people fro drama instead of how well they can compete and they made is super easy to see that two weeks in a row

reply

I definitely don't like the direction they're taking the show in. It's starting to be really aggravating to watch.

reply

Glad to see I'm not the only one baffled by the Crypt Cookers going home.

reply

Last year I was disappointed because I felt the wrong team won and this year, I'm even more disappointed with the fact that the Underbakers are still on. I do feel like the producers are keeping them around for drama instead of actual talent.

-"Moo with me"

reply

Me too! I was so upset with last year's winner.

reply