MovieChat Forums > Brand X with Russell Brand (2012) Discussion > Probably won't work for American audienc...

Probably won't work for American audience.


This type of improv and discussion just doesn't work in the States, seems UK is more open to this type of show. Or just make it into a true talk show or discussion panel, him trying to mix comedy while giving serious opinions on stuff all by himself is an overload.

The production quality didn't help either, what's the point of all these reverse angles being shown, it comes across as some comedy special but then it's not, they need to make up their minds.

reply

[deleted]

Exactly my thoughts. He's trying really hard to be funny and instead we get a man on stage showcasing his insecurities as a person. It screams 'LIKE ME, LOVE ME, PLEASE'.

reply

Just out of curiosity, Do many in the UK find him to be obnoxious? I just don't have the tolerance for his act or movies, and in all honesty, don't find him funny period. And I am a fan of British humor and sensibilities.

reply

For some reasons I liked his old show on MTV uk a lot more! The chemistry he had with his guest used to be the main thing why I liked those shows... Bring back Gritty the dealer! He'll fix this puppy right up ;-)

reply

Going off this first episode I'll say that it's not quite on par with his past shows of similar formats. Given the subject it seemed like he'd need a bit longer to really come full circle on the topic, get a few laughs and not make it seem like a quickie in the back of the car. Could maybe use a guest, he seems to have made a lot of friends, could've been a big draw.
Supposedly it's filmed while he's on the road as to keep up to date on the 'news', which partially explains the questionable production value.
He mentioned on Marc Maron's podcast that Oliver Stone had approached him about a documentary and that he's had camera's following him for years now, so I imagine those same camera's are filming this show.

I definitely think, or hope there's at least 22 minutes out there for Brand. There aren't many that are or would, after having been afforded so much unwarranted attention by the mainstream media, leverage that extended gift of fame into an attempt at an entertaining discussion involving positive idea's and real societal issues as he often does.

There's so much vapidness perpetuated everyday via the same medium that people passively absorb, so I appreciate Brand for putting idea's and perspectives of the like out there into the ethos.

reply

I'm not familiar with his UK stuff, but i think the show is pretty good. it's different than anything I have seen and it's funny.

I came here with my dick in my hand - Mystikal "Shake Ya Ass"

reply

This show shouldn't work for ANY audience. It's terrible. The studio audience is frequently uncomfortable and sometimes has to be held at gunpoint to produce a chuckle. He doesn't even know what he is trying to do. Terrible.

That being said, I hope it airs for ten years because I'm laughing at it for reasons he didn't intend.

It's impressive to see a man feeding off his emotions.

reply

I'm American and I LOVE his show, but I'm also a fan of UK comedy always have been. I"m always watching the Graham Norton Show, but I think it depends on someones taste in comedy some people like this kind of comedy and some don't.

Behind every great man is a woman rolling her eyes.

reply

I'm a southerner from a Red State, and have a few issues with the show, but overall it's highly entertaining to me. He's not always a riot with laughter, but his little existential comments and his grand view of the world are what I enjoy. I understand that type of thing is not for everyone, but it is a niche that will find an audience if they know it's out there. He comes across as an 80's hair band vocalist when you look at him, but he is so much more than that when you get down to it. He's like a stout beer, when you first try it you are kinda put off by it, but as you are exposed to it more and more it becomes your first choice. That's my humble opinion of Mr. Brand. Unfortunately, there will be a large group of people who would like the show, but stay away, or watch the first episode till it's first commercial break, change the channel with an exclamation of "This SUCKS!" and never check it out again. I'm not saying I blame them, I just wish it had brought the funny first, and then settled in to what it's really about. You have to achieve an audience first then go for the weird and uncommon format. If you wanna have a highly successful show that is. If it's good people will push for it to be popular. If it's "eh" it will stay through it's initial run and never be heard of again. Also, not everyone's first attempt at a television show finds their strengths and appeals to the right people. I can think of a couple big ones. Louise C.K. had a show on HBO called Lucky Louise or something like that and it was GOD AWFUL, but look at his current show. It's perfect for him and his comedy. If it was something different like a regular sitcom it wouldn't be watchable. Jon Stewart had his show on MTV way back when, and it wasn't very good either. Now he's got the best show on TV in my opinion. I think Russel has the same problem. I think he's capable of making a good television show. I'm just not so certain this is gonna be his hit.

reply

"Weird uncommon format?" He paces on a stage unintelligibly barking about weird news. It's the safest possible thing he could have done, and he has still fallen on his face every week. The fifteen minute purse bit was a fitting summation for the entire show. That being said I will watch every single week because I love it like I do Troll 2.

It's impressive to see a man feeding off his emotions.

reply

I agree with you but laughed so hard at "Louise" CK doing Lucky "Louise".

reply

Zersch, I was referring to the first couple episodes. I know it's not weird or uncommon in a lot of ways, but it isn't conventional either (or wasn't). Where he jumps in the audience and sits on laps, and has the nerdy guy answer his questions about this and that. I just thought it odd. I may be wrong.

Infinite_Zero, You're right, I knew it looked wrong at the time of post, but I couldn't think of how to spell his name and was way too lazy to google it at the time. Also, I'm from Kentucky, and Louiseville is pronounced the same way you say Louie's name where I am at. So, that was my frame of refrence. Thanks for agreeing, and laughing at me :D

reply

You spelt Louisville wrong, too.

reply

Did his re-make of "Arthur" break any box-office records in the United Kingdom? I just don't think the guy is that popular on either side of "the pond."

reply

This won't work in any country.

*beep* is *beep*

reply