MovieChat Forums > Wadjda (2013) Discussion > How did Saudi Arabia let this movie to ...

How did Saudi Arabia let this movie to be choosen for Oscar?



First of all I have to say that I loved this movie a lot. Especially Wadjda character. But I was surprised when I heard that Saudi Arabia let this movie to be sent for Oscar competition. Did the government decide to send it? I'm surprised because this movie scoffed all of the stupid rules in Saudi Arabia ( which I loved this scoffing by the way! :) ) So didn't the government become upset? Instead they send it for Oscar competition? I'm confused.




<<A bitter ending is better than an endless bitterness>>
About Elly.Asghar Farhadi

reply

Well wasn't it their only film to choose from? Lol

I guess they wanted some credit

reply

Maybe for some credit. But they never send a movie for Oscar. Why this year?

<<A bitter ending is better than an endless bitterness>>
About Elly.Asghar Farhadi

reply

I don't know. They say here it's good http://gulfnews.com/arts-entertainment/celebrity/saudi-arabia-submits-first-film-for-oscars-with-wadjda-1.1230829

Maybe they didn't get how subversive it was ;-)

But like I said, were there many other Saudi films made?

reply


though I don't actually know the reasoning of the powers the be in Saudi Arabia, a few things come to mind:

it could be a case as simple as someone involved in the production being well connected with certain government offices where things can get done

governments of nations with bad reputations, especially bad human rights reputations, sometimes use public relations tactics to improve their images in the world community. backing Wadjda would be a way for the Saudi leaders to say, "see? we're not so bad after all."

Wadjda is a co-production of Saudi Arabia and Germany. it's more difficult for a government to suppress a movie that has financial ties to other countries (see Miloš Forman's Firemen's Ball). the German production company may have had a lot to do with Wadjda being submitted to the Academy and distributed internationally

finally, few groups of people, governments included, are homogenous. behind a unified public image there are people who differ, disagree, and buy into public policy to varying degrees. sometimes it just takes a moderate person in the right position at the right time to make unusual things happen. I seem to recall there being a Soviet or Eastern Bloc instance where some Culture Minister's kid liked a movie, so it wasn't banned after all...vague recollection here


2014 Screenings: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls054830628/

reply

Those are good suppositions. I was as shocked as the OP by this.

--------
See a list of my favourite films here: http://www.flickchart.com/slackerinc

reply

How could Saudi Arabia keep a movie from being nominated? I bet North Korea would love to know.

reply

I don't think there is a government department for Oscar nominations. The film makers submitted it directly to the Academy, like most filmmakers do.


http://www.1971-reviewae.com

reply

It was their only film....
they didnt get how it made fun of stupid rules....

... or maybe, just maybe.... those people are not so narrow minded as we are lead to believe..

" Look, there's two women fuc*ing a polar bear "

reply

It was chosen by the academy, and the film doesn't belong to the government, thankfully.



reply

[deleted]